What's new

Indian Economy-News & Updates

How is the plan?

  • Good

    Votes: 161 61.7%
  • Average

    Votes: 53 20.3%
  • Poor

    Votes: 47 18.0%

  • Total voters
    261
The "Hindu rate of growth" is a derogatory description of the low annual growth rate of the pre-1991 Indian economy, which stagnated around 3.5% from 1950s to 1980s, while per capita income growth averaged 1.3%. In what appears to be an exaggeration, the Financial Times in its latest issue has an article titled "India’s abject return to talk of Hindu growth rates".

Written by James Lamont, the FT story says that "India trails in terms of attracting foreign capital and beating inflation.... some economists and industrialists fear India’s economy could shrink back towards what was derisively called the “Hindu rate of growth” from initial projections of 9 to 7 per cent this year."

With the India story unraveling due to big corruption scandals and governance deficit this year, the FDI fell by 28%, the second consecutive year of decline and the first such large decline since the opening up of the economy in 1991-92. As a result of this decline, the present level of $27 billion of FDI inflows is the lowest in four years.

Spurred by a tidal wave of hot money from the US Federal Reserve stimulus, the big drop in Indian FDI has been largely offset by the surge in FII in the last two years. In fact, the outflow of $15 billion was more than made up by inflows of $29 billion — their highest ever — in 2009-10. This level was largely maintained in 2010-11 as well, with a small increase. These hot money inflows continue to be a source of instability in the face of the Indian Central Bankers attempts to cool rising inflation. Such hot money inflows accounted for 58% of India's forex reserves in March 2010 compared to 47.9% in 2009, according to the Financial Express.

Even after the central bank boosting interest rates six times this year to 8.25 percent, India’s benchmark wholesale-price inflation has accelerated to a 13-month high of 9.78 percent in August 2011, according to Bloomberg.

It is very likely that the Indian central bankers will continue to maintain a tight money policy in the foreseeable future, and slow down the economy further to fight continuing inflation. I do think, however, that the Indian policymakers will try and orchestrate a soft landing in 2011-12, while still maintaining significantly higher gdp growth rates than the pre-1991 "Hindu rate of growth".

Haq's Musings: Indian Economy Slowing to "Hindu Rate of Growth"?
 
.
Developing a Multi-Specialty Health city - southindia - Bangalore - ibnlive

The "Hindu rate of growth" is a derogatory description of the low annual growth rate of the pre-1991 Indian economy, which stagnated around 3.5% from 1950s to 1980s, while per capita income growth averaged 1.3%. In what appears to be an exaggeration, the Financial Times in its latest issue has an article titled "India’s abject return to talk of Hindu growth rates".






































Haq's Musings: Indian Economy Slowing to "Hindu Rate of Growth"?

Dont spoil this thread with you BS..

Nobody wants to hear ur childish rants ..
 
.
Irrespective of useless rants, India is likely to have these figures in the next 4-5 years.

An economy of $4 trillion+
Exports of $600 billions
IT exports of $250 billion+ by the end of the decade

These are hard economic numbers. The poverty is going to fall dramatically in the next decade and there will be no mass poverty within a decade or two.

The last two decades were just the beginning, the real action is going to happen in the next two decades.
 
.
Exports should be $400 billions in the next 3-4 years. That will be cool.

Just the IT services exports can reach $200 billions in the next few years if we capture the coming opportunities.

not just IT export of $ 200 Bn hIS new brother Engineering export should also be $ 200 Bn
 
.
Irrespective of useless rants, India is likely to have these figures in the next 4-5 years.

An economy of $4 trillion+
Exports of $600 billions
IT exports of $250 billion+ by the end of the decade

These are hard economic numbers. The poverty is going to fall dramatically in the next decade and there will be no mass poverty within a decade or two.

The last two decades were just the beginning, the real action is going to happen in the next two decades.

4 trillion plus in 4-5 years? What growth rate are we looking at?

Whats the latest GDP figure for Indian anyways?
 
.
India's FY12 GDP seen growing close to 8 pct-adviser | Reuters

(Reuters) - India's economy is seen growing close to 8 percent in the current fiscal year to March, C. Rangarajan, chairman of the prime minister's Economic Advisory Council said on Thursday.

High interest rates have slowed growth in Asia's third largest economy and private economists have said that growth would be below 8 percent in FY12 though policymakers say 8 to 8.5 percent expansion is possible.

---------------------

Fin min calls for expediting infra projects

Worried by the looming European economic crisis and the slow progress of some major public sector infrastructure projects worth ` 30,000 crore, which could impact the already sluggish economic growth, the Government has decided to put them on fast track, by addressing logistical and environmental concerns, with the aim of sending out a positive message to India Inc.

According to highly placed sources, the Finance Ministry is learnt to have sent out a clear message that all major infrastructure projects, which are either stuck in a limbo or have been delayed owing to various reasons (including environment related concerns), should be expedited, considering the fact that around Rs 30,000 crore worth of investments are riding on them.
 
. . .
Key facts on India`s proposed land bill


MUMBAI (Reuters) - India's proposed new bill to replace a century-old land-acquisition law could mean cost increases and project delays for developers due to provisions for increased compensation for former landowners.

The bill, likely to be passed in December, was envisaged to bring clarity to an often murky part of doing business in Asia's third largest economy, but will slow development, capacity expansion and economic growth, companies say.

But rural farmers, a core vote base for the ruling Congress party that has tabled the bill, say they are being cut out of the spoils of India's economic rise by powerful land developers in cahoots with politicians.

The following are some key facts about the bill.

WHY IS IT NEEDED?

India's land laws date back to the British rule and are ill-suited to the large infrastructure and housing projects the country needs to remove bottlenecks and sustain continued growth.

Several projects, including multi-billion-dollar investments by firms such as ArcelorMittal, POSCO and Tata Motors, have been delayed or abandoned due to villagers' protest over land acquisitions.

Companies say they want a robust system that will protect their investments, while the government wants to placate millions of rural voters before a general election in 2014.

COST OF REFORMS

Companies and analysts estimate that the bill will raise land costs by up to 350 percent, pushing up project costs by up to 40 percent.

Purchasers will be forced to pay six times the current market value to acquire rural plots, and twice the current market value for urban plots.

In addition, all government acquisitions and private purchases of more than 100 acres in rural areas and more than 50 acres in urban areas will be required to pay relief and rehabilitation fees to former owners.

Former land owners' families will be entitled to a new house, relocation costs, employment for one family member, 2,000 rupees ($42) per month for 20 years and a 20 percent share of any capital gains made by selling the land within ten years.

CORPORATES CRITICISE

While welcoming the bill's premise to tighten rules and set clear compensation amounts, executives across India's real-estate and infrastructure industries have criticised the bill, saying it will make projects prohibitively expensive.

Developers say the government should not get involved in deals between private firms and landowners, and have warned that delays caused by the cumbersome compensation rules could harm investment, capacity expansion and economic growth.

HOW LIKELY IS IT TO PASS?

A previous version of the bill was passed in 2007 by the lower house of parliament, but lapsed when parliament was dissolved for the 2009 federal elections.

The new draft will be debated by a standing committee, before it goes back to both houses of parliament. Both houses must agree on its contents for the bill to become law.

With support from opposition parties, the bill is likely to pass in December when parliament reconvenes, but could potentially be held up if debate is disrupted by other political issues, as has happened to other bills in previous sessions.



FACTBOX - Key facts on India`s proposed land bill - Reuters -
 
.
We went from $1 trillion to $2 trillions in 4 years. We can do it again.

Nominal per capita incomes in both India and Pakistan stand at just over $1200 a year, according to figures released in May and June of 2011 by the two governments. This translates to about $3100 per capita in terms of PPP (purchasing power parity). Using a more generous PPP correction factor of 2.9 for India as claimed by Economic Survey of India 2011 rather than the 2.5 estimated by IMF for both neighbors, the PPP GDP per capita for Indian and Pakistan work out to $3532 and $3135 respectively.

But Looking at the increase in nominal GDP alone can be quite misleading in judging the health of any economy.

Nearly 10% inflation has pushed India's nominal GDP to about $1.5 trillion in 2011, still well below $2 trillion you claim.

Haq's Musings: India and Pakistan Per Capita GDPs at $3,100 in 2010-11
 
.
Nominal per capita incomes in both India and Pakistan stand at just over $1200 a year, according to figures released in May and June of 2011 by the two governments. This translates to about $3100 per capita in terms of PPP (purchasing power parity). Using a more generous PPP correction factor of 2.9 for India as claimed by Economic Survey of India 2011 rather than the 2.5 estimated by IMF for both neighbors, the PPP GDP per capita for Indian and Pakistan work out to $3532 and $3135 respectively.

But Looking at the increase in nominal GDP alone can be quite misleading in judging the health of any economy.

Nearly 10% inflation has pushed India's nominal GDP to about $1.5 trillion in 2011, still well below $2 trillion you claim.

Haq's Musings: India and Pakistan Per Capita GDPs at $3,100 in 2010-11

Any link for that figure?
 
.
Nominal per capita incomes in both India and Pakistan stand at just over $1200 a year, according to figures released in May and June of 2011 by the two governments. This translates to about $3100 per capita in terms of PPP (purchasing power parity). Using a more generous PPP correction factor of 2.9 for India as claimed by Economic Survey of India 2011 rather than the 2.5 estimated by IMF for both neighbors, the PPP GDP per capita for Indian and Pakistan work out to $3532 and $3135 respectively.

But Looking at the increase in nominal GDP alone can be quite misleading in judging the health of any economy.

Nearly 10% inflation has pushed India's nominal GDP to about $1.5 trillion in 2011, still well below $2 trillion you claim.

Haq's Musings: India and Pakistan Per Capita GDPs at $3,100 in 2010-11

Inflation rate in India in jul 2011 = 8.43
Inflation rate in Pakistan in jul 2011 = 13.8

looks like the so called inflation push in Pakistan is almost double of that of India.. :)
 
.
Any link for that figure?

Go check out the link I gave you to find several other links to supporting data.

Haq's Musings: India and Pakistan Per Capita GDPs at $3,100 in 2010-11

---------- Post added at 11:23 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:22 AM ----------

Inflation rate in India in jul 2011 = 8.43
Inflation rate in Pakistan in jul 2011 = 13.8

looks like the so called inflation push in Pakistan is almost double of that of India.. :)

Where did you learn math?
 
.
Nearly 10% inflation has pushed India's nominal GDP to about $1.5 trillion in 2011, still well below $2 trillion you claim.

India Gross Domestic Product (GDP)

1729 billion..

---------- Post added at 11:55 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:54 PM ----------

Go check out the link I gave you to find several other links to supporting data.

Haq's Musings: India and Pakistan Per Capita GDPs at $3,100 in 2010-11

---------- Post added at 11:23 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:22 AM ----------



Where did you learn math?

Not from Riaz's school of half cooked numbers :)

btw, where did you learn English.. ?? Remember the meaning of Almost ??
 
.
Go check out the link I gave you to find several other links to supporting data.

Haq's Musings: India and Pakistan Per Capita GDPs at $3,100 in 2010-11



So you are talking about gdp per capita(PPP) in terms of international dollars right? This is according to Sep 2011, World Economic Outlook Database.

2wn4d5e.jpg


Report for Selected Countries and Subjects

2011- Pakistan-$2720.531
India----$3703.453


So in 2011, there is a gap of almost $1000 dollars, in 2014 it will be $1500 and in 2016 it will be $2000

Yep I think I would rather believe IMF's database than your blog.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom