Kyusuibu Honbu
BANNED
- Joined
- May 21, 2010
- Messages
- 15,305
- Reaction score
- -21
- Country
- Location
lunginomists
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
lunginomists
“Unlike India”, consumption data is enough to puncture tall claims of prosperity. Else nobody is interested in demonising muslims, they win elections on promises they make and fulfill it.Obviously we will have economic growth. Our autocratic government survives by delivering economic prosperity (which is visible and we can feel it). Unlike, india where parties win election by demonizing Muslims and doing everything possible to harm Muslims and win hindu votes. Lol...
We just changed the base year in 2015, something even Bangladesh did recently as well as Pakistan. Pretty normal thing to do so what is absurd here?BBS aren't saint but, they aren't as bad as ISS. You folks have changed your GDP calculation method to show economic growth. Lol.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/india-changes-gdp-calculation-method-1422622762?
Slums in Mumbai are being bulldozed into highrise apartments and townships which will house the dwellers in them and improve their lives, something asian tigers next door wouldn’t.India's economy is effed up for more than one reason, all attributable to this fast-talker Nazi populist idiot Modi. Note-bandi was just one in a series of massive eff-ups dreamt up by unqualified idiots like Nirmala-la-la.
Top-down growth doesn't suit 3rd world hovels like Bangladesh and India, but Modi and his great economic minds think they have a first world economy, so Top- down growth is what they focus on. Wrong!
Bangladesh continues to grow because they have an economy based on solid fundamentals of bottom-up growth where things forgotten in India like inclusivity (Dalit employment, anyone?), womens' education, basic health/hygiene and other HDI parameters are focused on. Got to have a strong foundation to build on. Otherwise - close, but no cigar.
You cannot have Shivaji airport next to Dharavi and call India a first world country. Can't have Antilla sitting next to slums and call it "Normal and acceptable".
What’s ISS? Consumption data is available courtesy the brands selling their cars, electronics etc. rest we all know how many cars are sold in BD and India.Data provided by ISS. Lol...
As you dreamEvery hindu is.
their manifesto has no mention of your fantasies.Yep, they promise to harm Muslims...
The rebasing led to a minor decrease of 2.3% in the GDP when the government changed the base year and updated the way it calculates the GDP, quite visible how it must’ve increased India’s GDP on paper to $1000 quadrillionLol, read the article or at least google about this topic. India changed GDP calculation method not just year rebase...
Bingo. I bash BBS day in, day out but that does not mean they are the only dodgy stats agency on the planet and others are better.BBS aren't saint but, they aren't as bad as ISS. You folks have changed your GDP calculation method to show economic growth. Lol.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/india-changes-gdp-calculation-method-1422622762?
Lol..you got hit in the head when you were young? Why don't u have the b*lls to post the full UN GDP forecast post? They reduced the GDP growth forecast for the entire world from 3.6% to 2% due to Ukhraine war.
India's economy is effed up for more than one reason, all attributable to this fast-talker Nazi populist idiot Modi. Note-bandi was just one in a series of massive eff-ups dreamt up by unqualified idiots like Nirmala-la-la.
Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Tuesday dismissed the World Inequality Report that termed India as a "poor and very unequal" country. Disregarding the global report as “flawed”, she raised questions about its methodology.
Top-down growth doesn't suit 3rd world hovels like Bangladesh and India, but Modi and his great economic minds think they have a first world economy, so Top- down growth is what they focus on. Wrong!
Well we can agree to disagree, but I don't consider inclusivity fancy or optional. Women and the poor must be members of the workforce. This did work in China and of course the UK and US.
By inclusivity I mean that of education, opportunity and thereby wealth. For the poor, under-educated and of course women.
Value addition per capita is directly related to education. Educated people add more value per unit of time.
If you don't educate your poor than how will you have a well-educated workforce who will add higher quality labor and value for export?
A country cannot survive on low grade labor and price-leader value-addition forever. They will get priced out of the market as soon as salaries go up and become uncompetitive compared to surrounding countries in the same economic tier.
This is the very reason some countries in ASEAN have faced middle income trap.
@Homo Sapiens, @jamahir bhais and brother @Indos would you agree?
“Unlike India”, consumption data is enough to puncture tall claims of prosperity. Else nobody is interested in demonising muslims, they win elections on promises they make and fulfill it.
Slums in Mumbai are being bulldozed into highrise apartments and townships which will house the dwellers in them and improve their lives, something asian tigers next door wouldn’t.
UNCTAD saw 2021 growth rate at 5% in March 2021.
UNCTAD sees India growth at 5% in 2021
UNCTAD said for the global economy, the overall cost of the crisis has been exorbitant with the brunt of the hit to the global economy being felt in developing countries with limited fiscal space, tightening balance of payments constraints and inadequate international support.economictimes.indiatimes.com
Now they assess the same at 8.3%.
Resident economists and lunginomists should calm their tits.
Under the new PLI scheme, the government has identified focus industries and has promised to subsidise local production (for winners) supported by import tariffs. This push towards local production by force reminds me of license raj. Import tariffs may hurt other industries that depend on cheap imports for their production. I hope you can understand the rest.
Individual states cannot really promote industries that are outside the ones that Central government
It is aimed at increasing localisation and manufacturing of items. Earlier in 5 years $520 bn of production was intended but the commitment received for PLI scheme is overwhelming, so it is going to be more higher than that.License raj might be too strong an analogy.
Services industry is really seeming like it’s on autopilot these days. All I see i growth. So maybe it’s not such a bad idea to focus on manufacturing a bit.
When critics say we need to have an independent analysis of PLI, yeah, I agree with that. Decision making is sketchy as hell and I wonder if it’s as effective as intended.
A lot of family businesses and foreign MNCs have revised their investment strategy (positively) to leverage benefits under the scheme. But there’s just no visibility on how it might be affecting SMEs.
Yeah all this is fine. Already we’re looking at small caps becoming mid caps and mid caps becoming large caps. But outside of these, will we see growth of ancillary industries? Will we see growth in SME sector? Most importantly, will it create jobs in the scale we need?It is aimed at increasing localisation and manufacturing of items. Earlier in 5 years $520 bn of production was intended but the commitment received for PLI scheme is overwhelming, so it is going to be more higher than that.
What I’m interested will be in more PLI schemes in ship building and aviation sector in future as we’re among the top largest aviation markets. Recently Akasa Airlines ordered $9bn of aircrafts from Boeing and all of which will be built in USA, except aerospace structures which Boeing manufactures in India and exports it to the assembly lines in USA. Ship building is another potential area where we must boost production through incentives.
It will create domestic supply chains and those will have SMEs and MSMEs as important players. A lot of localisation will directly help the SMEs as they’ll get contracts for supplying components of electronics, automobiles etc.Yeah all this is fine. Already we’re looking at small caps becoming mid caps and mid caps becoming large caps. But outside of these, will we see growth of ancillary industries? Will we see growth in SME sector? Most importantly, will it create jobs in the scale we need?
A large segment of our population relies on MSMEs for sustenance. I do sincerely hope this shift in priority isn’t going to end up being a case study on shoving the poor under the carpet.
Personally and professionally, this works for me just as it probably works for most Indians here. But there are other stakeholders to consider.
In an ideal situation, yes. Here’s to hoping optimism prevails.It will create domestic supply chains and those will have SMEs and MSMEs as important players. A lot of localisation will directly help the SMEs as they’ll get contracts for supplying components of electronics, automobiles etc.
Recently Akasa Airlines ordered $9bn of aircrafts from Boeing and all of which will be built in USA, except aerospace structures which Boeing manufactures in India and exports it to the assembly lines in USA.