New Recruit
Dude How do you know Average Indian Mentality , have you ever been here ? Its what your Media portrays and Vice versa to Indian Media. We Indians are not racist as we have the maximum diversity and ya we Indians fight among each other for petty issues but when it comes to external forces, We stand like a Wall.
Forget about Persian gulf...Iran will never make a base for India
I don't watch media often rather I said i been with Indians ,I know who are looking folks are who are racist ... those internal isues shows the mentality of people ..I'm not disrespecting most Indians but they are...
New Recruit
We Indians know whom to condemn/criticise and when . We criticise RSS for its certain statements but acknowledge for there selfless contribution in national disasters and promoting nationality solely. We Indians also criticise bodies like Hijbul mujhadin, Various terrorist organisation in Pakistan speaking against India and Indians. We Laugh out Loud when we hear Zaid Hamid when he speaks about Gazwa Hind and speaks crazy theories.
Parikars address. When he says
Why Indians need to use USA bases for that"Use each other's bases" - this does not mean NATO bases. India didn't sign a logistics cooperation agreement with NATO, just the US.
India doesn't suddenly have access to Incirlik, despite a large US presence. It didn't negotiate with NATO.
Also, access to overseas US bases is subject to both US and domestic approval, so this doesn't grant you 100% access to those either, such as Atsugi or Kadena in Japan.
Or Naval Station Rota in Spain.
You will still need to negotiate with the host nation, not just the US. With the US itself there are still restrictions on the use and access to certain US bases.
Groom lake will be restricted.
You will have access to logistics and basing capabilities in others like Norfolk or Pearl Harbor or Andersen AFB.
New Recruit
Sir I am aware on that that's why I said in the same post that I believed it went like that, though it was my personal opinion. Thank you.I don't really care. I just want to stop this:
This agreement has nothing to do with NATO. India would need to negotiate separate agreements with NATO nations.
India isn't going to clear NATO nations for logistics support within them... those NATO nations will clear India and either allow or bar India from accessing their support and facilities, not the other way around.
To support extended operations in non-local territory. This agreement could allow India to make use of US bases in South Korea, Japan or Australia (assuming they are given clearance by the local government) for logistics resupply by the US. This in turn would allow the IN or IAF to support operations such as FONOPs in the SCS, East China Sea, Yellow Sea or Sea of Japan and beyond such as goodwill visits to South or Central America or up into Europe with support from the US in the Med or North Sea and Baltics (again with approval from regional nations. India doesn't have Carte Blanche' access to NATO bases because of this agreement).
Neither India or China can support extended ops in each others regional waters, unlike the US with a vast support and logistics network in regional nations, Russia can't either. This agreement allows for the prospect of the IN and IAF to actually achieve such extended ops in non-regional air and water space, which is largely unprecedented, but again and like so many before it, is a function of US logistics support.
Such bases would include Misawa, which is a USAF basing and logistics facility (subject to Japanese approval. Given Indo-Japanese relations, this isn't too unlikely to be granted.).
Or at Doha.
And even US owned bases like Andersen in Guam.
But frankly, I don't give two sh*ts about what India gets out of the deal.
I'm interested in how it impacts US operations in the region such as in Afghanistan or the Indian Ocean and West Africa.
NAM became useless, the day Indonesia supported Pakistan, in 1965 war.
It's useless in reality .. Japanese base could b use against war with china but what china will come against India ,Japan etc that may Japanese need to think ....Doha base could be use against pak but unfortunately pak qatar relations won't let it happenI don't really care. I just want to stop this:
This agreement has nothing to do with NATO. India would need to negotiate separate agreements with NATO nations.
India isn't going to clear NATO nations for logistics support within them... those NATO nations will clear India and either allow or bar India from accessing their support and facilities, not the other way around.
To support extended operations in non-local territory. This agreement could allow India to make use of US bases in South Korea, Japan or Australia (assuming they are given clearance by the local government) for logistics resupply by the US. This in turn would allow the IN or IAF to support operations such as FONOPs in the SCS, East China Sea, Yellow Sea or Sea of Japan and beyond such as goodwill visits to South or Central America or up into Europe with support from the US in the Med or North Sea and Baltics (again with approval from regional nations. India doesn't have Carte Blanche' access to NATO bases because of this agreement).
Neither India or China can support extended ops in each others regional waters, unlike the US with a vast support and logistics network in regional nations, Russia can't either. This agreement allows for the prospect of the IN and IAF to actually achieve such extended ops in non-regional air and water space, which is largely unprecedented, but again and like so many before it, is a function of US logistics support.
Such bases would include Misawa, which is a USAF basing and logistics facility (subject to Japanese approval. Given Indo-Japanese relations, this isn't too unlikely to be granted.).
Or at Doha.
And even US owned bases like Andersen in Guam.
But frankly, I don't give two sh*ts about what India gets out of the deal.
I'm interested in how it impacts US operations in the region such as in Afghanistan or the Indian Ocean and West Africa.
