Jf Thunder
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2013
- Messages
- 9,194
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
Women > MEnwomen are useless too we only learn about each other's importance when we share common interest
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Women > MEnwomen are useless too we only learn about each other's importance when we share common interest
only in alphabetsWomen > MEn
You should not be surprised.eh? i think you took me wrong, i didnt say your Army men are useless, i was trying to say that Women> men as your Army is rescuing women before men, this proving men are useless?
you get it now? Humor?
Advice: Stop thinking about it.Giving preference to children, old, infirm is understandable..........but, when it comes to able bodied women and men, the preference should be EQUAL........
We should do away with these old, male-chauvinistic protocols of preferring/giving extra privilege to Women thinking they are weak.........
Modern women think they're equal to men in every aspect and don't want men to look at them as weak and incapable......they want to end all discrimination..............in that spirit, we should scrap these old, discriminatory, male-chauvinistic protocols.
the only useful thing men can do is come on PDF and troll each other outonly in alphabets
that's skill, trolling is an artthe only useful thing men can do is come on PDF and troll each other out
trolling at its bestthat's skill, trolling is an art
thanks for appreciating the arttrolling at its best
You are actually right. Saving old /disable/sick people and children on priority basis make sense but there is no logical explaination of saving adult woman before adult man unless we assume life of woman is more precious than manThe idea behind saving woman and children first is western one. But uncivilized 3rd worlders can't make up their own mind. I will personally hate being left behind because of woman(unless she is relative), childrens are ok.
Otherwise there should be toss to decide.
You are actually right. Saving old /disable/sick people and children on priority basis make sense but there is no logical explaination of saving adult woman before adult man unless we assume life of woman is more precious than man
What do you mean? Children and old people are vulnerable and weaker among others who rely on others for their defence even during non emegency situtations but adult man or woman is different matterTrue, it is not logical. But old/women/children first is not logical at all.
What do you mean? Children and old people are vulnerable and weaker among others who rely on others for their defence even during non emegency situtations but adult man or woman is different matter
No women claim that they are equal to man and are not weaker in any sense and can do any job man does from soldier to pilots and from scientist to working in fields so then adult men is as vulneable as adult woman during rescue mission and also old man is as vulenable as old woman so here picking old women before old man is discriminationFrom what you are saying, aren't men stronger than women? Adult women might not be as vulnerable as old or sick or children, but she would not be at the smissionel as men, would she?
No women claim that they are equal to man and are not weaker in any sense and can do any job man does from soldier to pilots and from scientist to working in fields so then adult men is as vulneable as adult woman during rescue mission and also old man is as vulenable as old woman so here picking old women before old man is discrimination