Yaduveer
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2011
- Messages
- 1,866
- Reaction score
- -5
- Country
- Location
This is oxymoronic statement from Our army, on one hand they want to retain old caste based army units but denying that status to other castes in name of all India infantry.Why don't they to reform all caste based regiments into all India infantry?
Following are ill effect of current system
1. Ahirs/Yadavs hold grudges against Jaats because later have a regiment in name of Jaat regiment. similar is case with Gurjars.
2. If there regiment like Punjab,Rajputana,Assam Rifles(Paramilitary),Jammu&kashmir light infantry then what is wrong with Gujrat regiment, Look at following quote in same news.
Either scrap all caste/religion names from Regiments or name the regiments according to achievements and demands of a community but this double standards of Army should have no place in democracy like India.plz STOP this Apartheid
Following are ill effect of current system
1. Ahirs/Yadavs hold grudges against Jaats because later have a regiment in name of Jaat regiment. similar is case with Gurjars.
2. If there regiment like Punjab,Rajputana,Assam Rifles(Paramilitary),Jammu&kashmir light infantry then what is wrong with Gujrat regiment, Look at following quote in same news.
"Jawans, with similar language and eating habits, have kinship, brotherhood...they form a cohesive fighting force. Even in mixed class regiments like Grenadiers, individual companies - the basic fighting units — are `pure'," said a Colonel.
Either scrap all caste/religion names from Regiments or name the regiments according to achievements and demands of a community but this double standards of Army should have no place in democracy like India.plz STOP this Apartheid