Indian Army preparing for limited conflict with China: US intel chief
- Thread starter 1nd1a
- Start date
Killswitch
BANNED
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2011
- Messages
- 1,274
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Nothing wrong with preparing.
navtrek
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2009
- Messages
- 3,169
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
Even USA think india is a two-faced backstabber, and China can never trust india
For once, I agree with USA
How did u get that meaning from that sentence ? Sorry that is not what the article meant.
illusion8
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2011
- Messages
- 12,232
- Reaction score
- -20
- Country
- Location
What the F is 81??
am I missing some lame joke pulled out from your nether region??
peep
BANNED
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2011
- Messages
- 1,075
- Reaction score
- 0
Dont feed trolls !!
indianspetsnaz
BANNED
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2011
- Messages
- 374
- Reaction score
- 0
right on the money they only care about getting votes and stuffing their bank accounts there is no compassion to the population in India.
longyi
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2012
- Messages
- 872
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
In 2003 James Clapper, then head of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, attempted to explain the absence of WMDs in Iraq by asserting that the weapons materials were "unquestionably" shipped out of Iraq to Syria and other countries just before the American invasion, a "personal assessment" which Clapper's own agency head at the time, David Burpee, "could not provide further evidence to support."[4]
In an interview on December 20, 2010 with Diane Sawyer of ABC News, Clapper was completely unaware that twelve alleged would-be terrorists had been arrested in Great Britain earlier in the day.[5][6]
In February, 2011, when mass demonstrations were bringing down Mubarak's presidency in Egypt, Clapper told a House Intelligence Committee hearing that:
"The term 'Muslim Brotherhood'...is an umbrella term for a variety of movements, in the case of Egypt, a very heterogeneous group, largely secular, which has eschewed violence and has decried Al Qaeda as a perversion of Islam," ... "They have pursued social ends, a betterment of the political order in Egypt, et cetera.....In other countries, there are also chapters or franchises of the Muslim Brotherhood, but there is no overarching agenda, particularly in pursuit of violence, at least internationally." [7]
In March 2011, Clapper was heard at the United States Senate Committee on Armed Services and commented on the 2011 Libyan civil war that “over the longer term” Gaddafi “will prevail”. This position was loudly questioned by the White House, when National Security Advisor Thomas E. Donilon qualified his statement as a "static and one-dimensional assessment" and argued that “The lost legitimacy [of Gaddafi] matters". [8] During the same hearing he was also questioned when he neglected to list Iran and North Korea among the nuclear powers that might pose a threat to the United States.
From Wikipedia
HE IS A MORON!!!
In an interview on December 20, 2010 with Diane Sawyer of ABC News, Clapper was completely unaware that twelve alleged would-be terrorists had been arrested in Great Britain earlier in the day.[5][6]
In February, 2011, when mass demonstrations were bringing down Mubarak's presidency in Egypt, Clapper told a House Intelligence Committee hearing that:
"The term 'Muslim Brotherhood'...is an umbrella term for a variety of movements, in the case of Egypt, a very heterogeneous group, largely secular, which has eschewed violence and has decried Al Qaeda as a perversion of Islam," ... "They have pursued social ends, a betterment of the political order in Egypt, et cetera.....In other countries, there are also chapters or franchises of the Muslim Brotherhood, but there is no overarching agenda, particularly in pursuit of violence, at least internationally." [7]
In March 2011, Clapper was heard at the United States Senate Committee on Armed Services and commented on the 2011 Libyan civil war that “over the longer term” Gaddafi “will prevail”. This position was loudly questioned by the White House, when National Security Advisor Thomas E. Donilon qualified his statement as a "static and one-dimensional assessment" and argued that “The lost legitimacy [of Gaddafi] matters". [8] During the same hearing he was also questioned when he neglected to list Iran and North Korea among the nuclear powers that might pose a threat to the United States.
From Wikipedia
HE IS A MORON!!!
A rodent bites an elephant and runs away. Should the elephant feel humiliated?
No: it should only regret that he was careless and didn't trample it under his foot.
And make sure, that the rodent doesn't have the guts to come near, next time.
Understood....
secularbuster
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2011
- Messages
- 694
- Reaction score
- 0
secularbuster
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2011
- Messages
- 694
- Reaction score
- 0
We know that you're india's big daddy but the problem is your indian 'assets' don't know it, hence, they're so nervous. Perhaps you should arrange some sort of orientation classes for your indian 'assets', this will surely boost their courage.
scholseys
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2011
- Messages
- 6,429
- Reaction score
- -13
- Country
- Location
To all my PDF friends, this is what an emotional Indian with no logic looks like.
So, China is like a mouse and mother india is like an elephant to you!
Admittedly, China is too big to be called an ant. But there's an appropirate quotation in Hindi:
बड़ा हुआ तो क्या हुआ, जैसे पेड़ खजूर |
पंथी को छाया नहीं, फल लागे अति दूर ||
which translates in English as:
In vain is the eminence, just like a date tree
No shade for travelers, fruit is hard to reach
And further it's not the size but behaviour which characterises you .... China's behaviour was comparable to a rodent. Hence the analogy.
Similar threads
- Article
- Article
