@Sandy_3126
1)What are the parameters for design of pressure vessel,
2) can you successfully build a Submarine Hull by studying leased vehicle
Simple answer to both of your question is no you can not build a submarine by studying a leased vehicle, for the parameters for design you had the Russians on board from the day one.
Neither did I say the vehicle was leased for design I said it was leased for training of the crew. Do you have difficulty understanding plain English?
3)Can you successfully design a Nuclear propulsion for a submarine by operating one without dis-assembly and re-engineering every compononent ground up
Well, what is this thread about exactly??????????? Have you failed to notice, I and others are saying, it is a Charlie II Russian made nuclear powered submarine. Not an indigenous product of India. So where does the question of successful design comes from? You are proving our point, Indian did not design a thing it is all borrowed Obsolete Russian technology.
4) Can India be willing to upset its main defense partner by infringing on intellectual property of Russia.
Money talks, Russian were on board who knows what agreements were signed. Same way, the LCA is design by the French, for which you paid for their services, and called it indigenous. There is pattern to Indian madness called indigenous products.
5) Simplest question, can you exactly formulate the hull alloy and the treatment process by any non destructive means.
This question is already answered above, there was no need, design was Charlie II.
think about it in your spare time.
This is an obnoxious, condescending and insulting remarks. I had been kidding with you all, read my posts properly, if I say I am sufficiently educated, pay attention to what I say. This I had been trying to say to the Indians, think, before making the claims of indigenous products.
Ridiculous nature of Indians claims I have already exposed, for over two years the false rumour had been circulating in Indian media, Arihant is doing sea trials. While December 2010 articles says when it start the sea trials.
Your establishments are spreading false information through the press, to hide their abject failures, yet again. They launched the submarine without nuclear reactor and weapon carrying capabilities, because they were well behind the schedule, over run costs, over run time, not finished product, as usual. They fooled the Indians that it is ready and launched. Even though it is not either a nuclear powered submarine or capable to carry nuclear missiles.
So what was the purpose of launch of this submarine? Dont you have non-nuclear submarines in Indian stock?
Rest of your post is boosting as usual. I dont have to answer it.
Now, I suggest you should use all your spare time and think, before responding to my post. You will be just increasing your difficulties. As I said, until now, the only thing is proven without any answers from the Indian participants in the discussion, that it is a Charlie II submarine, not indigenous as falsely claimed, it does not have a nuclear reactor fitted, for which according to the evidence produced, the submarine had to be ripped opened and it could take another 2 years to get it ready.
Then there is the questions to build a weapon carrying sections, tubes, launching mechanism etc, this would take another year or more. After all the remaining work carried out. It needs to be tested first and then go through extensive sea trials and weapon firing tests before induction. We are still looking at least 5 years or beyond.
My request for the Indians, please do not waste my valuable time, be precise, I have built up the case through your own media. Either you provide undeniable proofs to prove to the contrary or accept my analysis based on your own media reports, thank you.