fsayed
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2013
- Messages
- 2,606
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Honestly Transport command is going the way of the fighters , Having too many types ! (pls correct me if im wrong) why have this?Russia Suspends Co-development Of Il-214 Medium Airlifter With India, Ilyushin To Resume On Its Own
Russian Ilyushin has suspended the co-development program with India to build Il-214 medium airlifter under the MTA program and has resumed the development at its own expense.
"The Ilyushin Aviation complex is developing the future medium airlifter for the Russian Aerospace Force at its own expense. A scaled model of the aircraft has been made, and the Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute (TsAGI) are gearing up for its wind-tunnel tests, using mock-ups of both the PS-90A and PD-14 engines," the company’s press office was quoted as stating by Russian Aviation Monday.
The future aircraft will be powered either by two PS-90As or by a pair of PD-14s, with the latter’s flight tests having started last year.
"The Ilyushin Aviation Complex has designated its future medium military transport aircraft development program as Il-214," the press office concluded.
In January, Ilyushin Director General Sergei Velmozhkin told journalists about the program having been put on hold. According to him, the company expected "to clarify somehow" the future of the program by the middle of the year. There have been no official statements about the cause behind the suspending of the Russian-Indian program.
The Il-214 is designed to carry and air-land troops, their equipment, and cargo. It is to haul 20 tons of cargo at a distance of over 2,000 km. The aircraft is supposed to operate from unpaved and artificial airfields, including those high in the mountains.
http://www.defenseworld.net/news/16...a__Ilyushin_To_Resume_On_Its_Own#.V3N9Q1OffHE
Honestly Transport command is going the way of the fighters , Having too many types ! (pls correct me if im wrong) why have this?
C-17 (3) Heavy Lift - will replace IL 76
Il-76 MD (17) Heavy Lift
Il-78 MKI (6) Tanker
A-50E (3) AEW&C
C-130J (5) Tactical - 6 more to receive .
An-32 (119) Medium Lift ( As IAF exits MTA , some says they selected Ukrains AN 178. )
HS-748 (68) Transport
Do-228 (24) Light transport
Boeing 737 Transport
Embraer 135BJ VIP transport
Embraer ERJ 145 AEW&C
So the C295 would replace the Hs478 and Do-228 soon wouldn't this include the An32?
By 2030 the IA and IAF should have 400-500 attack helos (Apache and LCH) along with another 150-200 Rudras considering there are about 20-30 Mi-25s in service now this is a MASSIVE jump in firepower over a relatively short period.
So the C295 would replace the Hs478 and Do-228 soon wouldn't this include the An32?
Also the C17 is 10 Aircrafts
But where is the doctrine?
I think they are already testing it.
I've read that each strike corps will have its own dedicated air squadrons. I don't know anything apart from that.
So the Order for the C295 isnt confirmed? or is it ?Sorry , my friend . the data is old .
I don't think it will replace DO 288 as they fall in light category . 19 seats. They are produced by HAL under licence . They received an order of 14 from IAF in 2015 . Avro for sure and AN 32 if its going through Make in India policy .
It isn't that simple; surely we all understand that. Whom will the squadrons report to? To the Corps Commander? Will the corps then fight as a corps? Where is the example of having done that before? We know of brigade-level command, of even division-led command; but a full-fledged corps? Can someone, anyone give me an example from south Asia?
If not to the Corps Commander, then to whom? Will these squadrons be allowed to concentrate and to have an impact on the battlefield, or will they be broken up into flights, even into individual units, and put in alongside armour to protect armour - from what? From infantry with MANPADs? From artillery? From opposing armour? From opposing attack helicopters? From ground attack fighters? From strategic bombing? FROM WHAT?
How will drones be deployed side by side with attack helicopters? Will information flow right back up the communication channels, and then flow back to the squadrons?
This simply needs to be digested, new doctrines evolved and thought through, intensive exercises are needed to introduce the elements of network-centricity and matrixed or multiplexed or devolved command structures. Planning needs to evolve; considering that all the elements under discussion can move rapidly and decisively, how will planners evolve their own plans to follow a rapidly-changing battlefield situation?
Sorry, but this sounds like the toy stage to me.
Mathura-based Strike 1 corps is conducting a major exercise 'Shatrujeet' in the deserts of Rajasthan to evaluate the capability of the Army to strike deep into enemy territory in an integrated air-land battle environment.
The army has been talking about incorporating attack helicopters since the mid 2000s. Naturally, nobody has information in open source.
http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/indian-army-conducts-battle-exercise-shatrujeet-in-rajasthan-1396215
So they seem to be working something out.