What's new

Indian Air Force Avoids Israel, Goes Global for Aerostats

arp2041

BANNED
Joined
Apr 4, 2012
Messages
10,406
Reaction score
-9
Country
India
Location
India
The Indian Air Force is entering the global market to buy six additional aerostat radars for more than $400 million, a decision that avoids awarding a repeat order to Rafael of Israel.

In the next one or two months, India will float tenders to Britain’s BAE Systems, U.S. companies Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman, France’s Thales, Israel Aerospace Industries and Russia’s Rosoboronexport, sources said.

The Indian Ministry of Defence agreed with the Air Force that fresh bids from the global market were better than giving repeat orders to Rafael. Air Force officials were not satisfied with the maintenance of two aerostat radars Rafael supplied, sources said.

Specifically, one of the two aerostat radars supplied by Rafael in 2007 was damaged in inclement weather along the Pakistan border in 2009 and has yet to become operational.

An Indian MoD source said Rafael demanded a high price for repair of the damaged radar, annoying the MoD.

The radars were based on a 2005 contract for three radars, which was awarded on a single-vendor basis.

Rafael executives in India were unavailable for comment on the accusations.

The state-owned Defence Research and Development Organisation is developing two home-grown aerostat prototypes. The total requirement is close to 30 in the next 10 years.

Radars mounted on aerostats, or tethered balloons, provide long-range, low-altitude detection of hostile aircraft. The Air Force requires the aerostat radars, which can be raised to 15,000 feet above sea level.

The aerostat radars to be purchased will include an advanced programmable radar, electronic intelligence, communication intelligence, V/UHF radio telephone equipment and identification-friend-or-foe technology. The radars will have a coverage area of 10 to 350 kilometers and be able to pick up targets ranging from ground level to 30,000 feet.

In addition, the payload will include an air surveillance radar to detect missiles and fighter aircraft at various ranges, a surface surveillance radar and a combined surveillance radar for air and surface targets.

“Both India and Pakistan are using aerostat radars, and the need for deployment of such systems has increased further to monitor of low-flying aircraft,” defense analyst Nitin Mehta said. “Each aerostat is capable of providing a three-dimensional, low-altitude coverage equal to more than 40 ground-based radars.”

Even the Indian Navy is planning to deploy aerostat radars for surveillance along the coastal border, an Indian Navy official said.

Indian Air Force Avoids Israel, Goes Global for Aerostats | Defense News | defensenews.com
 
. . .
This is how it should be-open tenders, the cream rises to the top, India gets the best. Not collusion or single-seller orders. This brings about a whole world of issues and can invite shady dealings.
 
.
This is how it should be-open tenders, the cream rises to the top, India gets the best. Not collusion or single-seller orders. This brings about a whole world of issues and can invite shady dealings.

Abing (or any other member) can u explain as to how Aerostats are different than say AWACS??
 
.
Good decision !! Get the best available in the market.
 
.
Abing (or any other member) can u explain as to how Aerostats are different than say AWACS??

Well firstly AEROSTATS are clearly completly static. As such if you have a mission where you need coverage of a specific area an AEROSTAT can be much more cost-effective and more useful. Now most AEROSTATS only carry very modest payloads- often a powerful EO/FLIR senor and maybe some limited radars and ELINT/COMINT sensors. Addtionally the AEROSTATS being static and large are pretty easy targets and pretty vulenrable to enemy attack and to weather incidents-they are highly vulnerable to even the most modest of gails. AWACS can cover huge areas and have immmensly more powerful sensors. But AWACS have a very different role to AEROSTATS, AWACS will usually be used to command and control freindly assets and detect enemy assets, AEROSTATS tend to be more focused on ground activity.
 
. . . .
Lol what a stupid title. Only Rafael has been avoided for the sake of diversifying our options and to offset any allegation of corruption on the MoD.

Israel aerospace is a contender instead :P
 
. .
Whatever happened to India's indigenous Akashdeep aerostat? The system has been developed by Aerial Delivery Research & Development Establishment (ADRDE), Agra Cantt, a laboratory under DRDO.

The Akashdeep aerostat is a medium-sized (35 metres long, 23 metres high) helium-filled balloon with a volume of 2,000 cubic metres tethered to the ground with cables. It can carry a 300 kg payload to an altitude of 1,000 meters. It can survey areas up to 20 km away and with advanced cameras and radar, its range is variously reported as 60 km or 100 km. The aerostat can used for surveillance, intelligence, broadcasting communication relay and jamming of electronic systems,

This system carries gyro-stabilized electro-optic and COMINT (communication intelligence) system for capturing and analyzing all types of communication in air and also have thermal camera for surveillance at night and in low visibility conditions. Various other ELINT (electronic intelligence) and RADAR payloads are also being developed indigenously.

DRDO has spent around Rs 70 crore on research and development of the device. It was under development for four years. A single fully developed unit is expected to cost Rs 16-20 crore each. The helium balloon is likely to be priced at Rs six to seven crore.

The Akashdeep aerostat system is expected to be delivered to the armed forces in the near future. ADRDE plans to build a second type of aerostat system known as Nakshatra for up to a height of 4500-5,000 meters and having a range variously reported as 200–250 km or 450 km with a payload capacity of 800 kg to 1 tonne and 17,000 cubic metre volume.
 
.
Avoids Isarel .....???? What's wrong with titles these days ??? Why not name the company ???
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom