45'22'
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 10, 2012
- Messages
- 5,029
- Reaction score
- -6
- Country
- Location
I see no need to increase the range
exactly,there is no need......but they can still work on it off the record
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I see no need to increase the range
Agni IV is Not a ballistic Missile But a Hypersonic Boost glide vehicle. Submarine launch version is in Making.
OK , What are the difference between a ballistic missile and a hypersonic boost glide vehicle .
BR science.OK , What are the difference between a ballistic missile and a hypersonic boost glide vehicle .
Elaborate Man.
Nothing, carry on..
I won't mind if you criticize me or even mock me. Your views are always valuable. Pl elaborate.
What he meant is that the guy who made this claim is actually a member of BR and not a credible source .
I won't mind if you criticize me or even mock me. Your views are always valuable. Pl elaborate.
This is actually based on the article of famous defense analyst Arun Vishwakarma. Let me find that article if it is available on net. Let Asseb counter it .
This is actually based on the article of famous defense analyst Arun Vishwakarma. Let me find that article if it is available on net. Let Asseb counter it .
Do share it. Although I might have read it but I'm not sure.
If you look closely at the high resolution pictures of Agni-4, the second stage is lined with a cable harness covering, which is very fragile for re-entry conditions. Furthermore, the second stage is solid-fueled and cannot be controlled/shut down/restarted, so it will be burnt out soon and the remaining body will act as dead weight if kept unattached. Moreover, the ReV will be incapable of making trajectory corrections for re-entry if the second stage is not detached.
Secondly, for an un-powered BGRV (if we consider Agni-4's black nose cone/payload section as the re-entry body), some sort of lift generating surface should be there, which has the capability of surviving the re-entry conditions (something like the X-51). Any structure like this is not present on Agni-4s ReV. So it cannot be considered as a BGRV.
Do share it. Although I might have read it but I'm not sure.
I see no need to increase the range
BR science.