Indian Aggression

[Supply&Demand]

Wow so the scoreline reads India 2 - 1 China. And even 1962, they ran away with their tails between their legs when we called or re-enforcements and backups. They used 80,000 troops to beat our poorly stationed 10,000 troops in 1962 and they are chest beating about that

The strategic doctrine of PRC is fight with huge numbers...They will never attack when u are ready for them.. The moment u talk about peace and relax, they will attack like hyenas attacking a wounded tiger. The moment they see a response building up, they will run away with tails between their legs

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

and u like to quote something that happened 50 yrs ago to make urself feel better...

Why dont u attack us now and see what happens...?? And since u already know we have only 2 days worth ammunition, why dont u take Arunachal Pradesh a.k.a South Tibet from us?

LOL @ Indian fanboys.

Do you think you know better than the Indian Armed Forces themselves? Here is what they said:

'India can't match China's military force': Indian Naval Chief - IBN Live

New Delhi: Chief of Naval Staff Admiral Sureesh Mehta has set off a storm by saying India cannot match China military force. Is it a warning from India's military that the government needs to hear?

"In military terms, both conventional and non-conventional, we neither have the capability nor the intention to match China force for force," said Admiral Sureesh Mehta.

For a nuclear-armed military representing the interests of a billion-plus people, the lack of confidence is quite striking. India's military leadership has made a stunning confession that New Delhi doesn't have the stomach for a fight, if push came to shove on the disputed Sino-Indian boundary.

"Whether in terms of GDP, defence spend or any other parameter, the gap between the two is too wide to bridge and is getting wider by the day," he said.

 

[lightoftruth]

@op do search with India n aggression their are multiple BS threads like this one involving premium troll members is their anything new? GET A LIFE

 

[neutral_person]

What actually happened, was that we were at possibly the weakest point in our history.

From 1959-1961 we had the worst famine in all of Chinese history (Great leap forward), and we were literally collapsing with starvation.

Added to that, we had BOTH the superpowers of the world (USA + USSR) as our sworn enemies, having recently fought against the USA + 16 of her allies in the Korean war. Combined with the Sino-Soviet split, we were surrounded on all sides by both the superpowers and their allies.

It was a fantastic opportunity for India, seeing China on the verge of collapse from starvation and famine, and surrounded on all sides by enemy superpowers.

First, they started talking about "Hindi Chini bhai bhai" (which was not returned)... then they backstabbed us by hosting our largest separatist group in 1959, followed by the Forward policy in 1962. They wanted Aksai Chin, but they didn't get it.

1962 war: 80,000 Chinese troops beat 10,000 Indian troops, and when India called for proper re-inforcements and backups to fight a full-fledged war, China ran away with their tails between their legs (declared unilateral withdrawal).

 

[bindaas]

Totally A B:s have to ever been tio hydrabad in ur life time ... still the nizams of Hydrabad are enjoying a luxurious life

the above picture is one of the palace which nizam shah of hydrabad lives and even the hydrabadis are partiotic towards India .
It was not the hindus who betrayed and ignored the deal it was the muslims them self choose to stay back in india instead of moving to pakistan .

All his sons, grandchildren are living in Hyderabad City and his anti-India wazir Kasim Rizvi is buried in some unknown graveyard of Karachi.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

1962 war: 80,000 Chinese troops beat 10,000 Indian troops, and when India called for proper re-inforcements and backups to fight a full-fledged war, China ran away with their tails between their legs (declared unilateral withdrawal).

You can try rewriting history as much as you want, but India tried to pounce on a weak and starving China, but got themselves thrashed.

 

[Shinigami]

LOL @ Indian fanboys.

Do you think you know better than the Indian Armed Forces themselves? Here is what they said:

'India can't match China's military force': Indian Naval Chief - IBN Live

the answer is right here

New Delhi: Chief of Naval Staff Admiral Sureesh Mehta has set off a storm by saying India cannot match China military force. Is it a warning from India's military that the government needs to hear?

"In military terms, both conventional and non-conventional, we neither have the capability nor the intention to match China force for force," said Admiral Sureesh Mehta.

For a nuclear-armed military representing the interests of a billion-plus people, the lack of confidence is quite striking. India's military leadership has made a stunning confession that New Delhi doesn't have the stomach for a fight, if push came to shove on the disputed Sino-Indian boundary.

"Whether in terms of GDP, defence spend or any other parameter, the gap between the two is too wide to bridge and is getting wider by the day," he said.

Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/183153-indian-aggression-11.html#ixzz1wAc6HqiH

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

Remember that this admission from the Indian Armed Forces that they have no hope of beating China, was made BEFORE the revelation that India has only 2 days worth of ammunition. So the situation is actually FAR worse then they were describing.

 

[Supply&Demand]

LOL @ Indian fanboys.

Do you think you know better than the Indian Armed Forces themselves? Here is what they said:

'India can't match China's military force': Indian Naval Chief - IBN Live

Same article posting again and again... tell me one thing .. do u bookmark these..???

And btw since ur comprehension is so weak considering ur high IQ...he means we cant match China weapon for weapon .. but it doesnt mean we cant protect our interests,...and he is only goading the govt to increase the share of IN's budget.

 

[Shinigami]

You can try rewriting history as much as you want, but India tried to pounce on a weak and starving China, but got themselves thrashed.

India tried to pounce on a weak and starving China? what intellect u people have

China attacked India because we hardly had a military in 1962

 

[Supply&Demand]

You can try rewriting history as much as you want, but India tried to pounce on a weak and starving China, but got themselves thrashed.

must be in ur PRC approved propaganda material...India did not attack China.. China attacked a unprepared India.

Pretty usual tactic for PRC..

 

[manofwar]

What actually happened, was that we were at possibly the weakest point in our history.

From 1959-1961 we had the worst famine in all of Chinese history (Great leap forward), and we were literally collapsing with starvation.

Added to that, we had BOTH the superpowers of the world (USA + USSR) as our sworn enemies, having recently fought against the USA + 16 of her allies in the Korean war. Combined with the Sino-Soviet split, we were surrounded on all sides by both the superpowers and their allies.

It was a fantastic opportunity for India, seeing China on the verge of collapse from starvation and famine, and surrounded on all sides by enemy superpowers.

First, they started talking about "Hindi Chini bhai bhai" (which was not returned)... then they backstabbed us by hosting our largest separatist group in 1959, followed by the Forward policy in 1962. They wanted Aksai Chin, but they didn't get it.

The famine didn't matter cause there were already thousands of chinese soldiers by the time we reached..........
It was also a politically weak moment for us as for the first time i the young republic's history the people were against the govt and the opposition had grown strong.....the Nehru govt had no idea of how to subdue the masses , and fight a war as well
The political turmoil lead to delay and we all know what happened afterwards......

 

[neutral_person]

You can try rewriting history as much as you want, but India tried to pounce on a weak and starving China, but got themselves thrashed.

Where am I rewriting history? Can you point out where I was wrong? India did not try to pounce on a weak China, if we were the agressors of the 1962 war, we would not have deployed only 10,000 of our 300,000 strong army in 1962 in North East India (our army is 1.1 million now). You guys attacked us becuase there were only 10,000 troops there, and you thought you could take over the territory. But when back-ups were called, you guys ran because you knew you had no chance.

 

[Shinigami]

must be in ur PRC approved propaganda material...India did not attack China.. China attacked a unprepared India.

Pretty usual tactic for PRC..

everything about PRC is propaganda. including their economy statistics


Marc Faber: Chinese Government Statistics Are Fake | ValueWalk

Chinese government statistics are fake for the most part and if Chinese economy is slowing down there will be more money printing in China. the Chinese government economic figures are meaningless, because they are manipulating most of the economic data, which confirms that there is no economic growth in China this year in fact China’s production of steel, cement and electricity as well as the volume of its exports and car sales are stable or declining compared to last year, which is incompatible with the growth announced by the government he explained

 

[bindaas]

India tried to pounce on a weak and starving China? what intellect u people have

China attacked India because we hardly had a military in 1962

Reminds me of Cuba missile crisis. These Chinese are evil expansionist, like their funny claim of south China sea.