Indian aggression on LOC: Pakistan Army Soldier Martyred

[SwAggeR]

some mad general found a way to remove his frustration .....PA should punch back ....

As if IA is punch bag .You provoked and seen the retaliation , the why this attitude ???

 

[Amaa'n]

To me it doesn't matter who fired first and whi raided who, today a Pakistani Solider lost his life, tomorrow some indian eill lose their, end of the day it will be the families of these jawans who will be affected, armies will always find new recruits.....

 

[Amaa'n]

If PA first attacked then india rather retaliation should have called for a meeting and take up the issue with seniors and if it was indian who started first then pakistan should have called the hire ups

 

[KRAIT]

And what exactly are those indian intruders trying on the border, inciting 'peace'?

Hamari ladai, tu chup kar. No one knows who started what ?

 

[DroneMailini]

Fighting has to stop and cease fire have to be declared again. I hope fighting ends soon.

 

[SwAggeR]

and whole pakistan belongs to india then and it was occupied n ruled by terrorist pak army [quote/]


Go ahead, take it, what's stopping the indian army? Something is definitely stopping the 'great' indian army! Could it be the shortage of a thing called courage?

If there was any shortage of courage then how were you detached from your western muslim brethern ??

 

[T-Rex]

A statement comes out from Pakistan 'India is not our enemy no. 1' and boom I have no doubt that hawks in PA are behind this blunder

The hawks in Pakistan or the hawks in New Delhi? The latter seems more suitable candidate!

 

[iam not greek]

And what exactly are those indian intruders trying on the border, inciting 'peace'?

who gave bangladeshis right to speak b/w two nuclear powers?

 

[Mani2020]

As if IA is punch bag .You provoked and seen the retaliation , the why this attitude ???

because your side started it and we have lost one soldier and one critically injured ...our soldiers blood is more important than any aman ki asha stuff ....rest assure you attack you also will not be safe ....

 

[DroneMailini]

To me it doesn't matter who fired first and whi raided who, today a Pakistani Solider lost his life, tomorrow some indian eill lose their, end of the day it will be the families of these jawans who will be affected, armies will always find new recruits.....

I also have the same feeling, but I want you to look the Previous threads of fire fighting between two armies, We have very well experienced, what your members used to say suppose if a Indian soldier is killed. Any way, In my opinion fighting has to stop Peace has to prevail and Cease fire has to be declared.

 

[third eye]

I wonder if it is designed to preempt any Chinese offence which seems quite close. Pakistan's response is astonishingly mild given the level of accusations coming against her from india on daily basis.

Chinese ' offence' ??

Are we seeing too many movies lately ??

Pakistan: Indian troops cross border, kill soldier; India says Pakistan fired first - CNN.com

(CNN) -- Tensions between India and Pakistan flared Sunday in the Kashmir region, with at least one Pakistani soldier killed in the violence, its military said.

But exactly what happened depends on the source.

According to the Pakistani military, Indian troops crossed the Line of Control -- the de facto border between India and Pakistan in the disputed Kashmir region -- and attacked a military post.

"Pakistan Army troops effectively responded and repulsed the attack successfully," but one Pakistani soldier was killed and another critically injured, the military said.

The Indian Defense Ministry, however, said Pakistani troops opened fire unprovoked on Indian posts in the north Uri sector of Indian-administered Kashmir.

Indian troops retaliated and forced Pakistani troops to stop firing, the defense ministry said. The ministry did not immediately report the number of casualties, but said three civilians were killed by Pakistani shelling in the area last October.

The territory under dispute lies in India's Kashmir Valley, separated from Pakistan by the 450-mile Line of Control.

The two south Asian nuclear neighbors have had a bilateral ceasefire along the de facto border since November 2003.

But the ceasefire has been violated repeatedly, with both sides accusing each other of offenses. Bilateral talks were temporarily suspended in 2008 following an attack by Pakistani militants in Mumbai, India's most populous city. The negotiations resumed last year.

The conflict dates back to 1947 after Britain relinquished control of the Indian subcontinent, giving birth to India and Pakistan.

Kashmir was free to accede to either nation. Maharaja Hari Singh, the ruler of the kingdom at the time, initially chose to remain independent but eventually opted to join India, thereby handing key powers to the central government in New Delhi. In exchange, India guaranteed him military protection and vowed to hold a popular vote on the issue.

The South Asian rivals have fought two of three wars over the territorial issue -- in 1947 and in 1965. A third conflict between India and Pakistan erupted in 1999 after Pakistani-backed forces infiltrated Indian-controlled Kashmir in the Kargil area.

Islamabad has always maintained that majority-Muslim Kashmir should have been a part of Pakistan. A United Nations' resolution adopted after the first war called for a referendum allowing the people of Kashmir to choose which country they wanted to join, but that vote for self-determination has never been held. Pakistan wants that referendum to take place.

India claims that Pakistan lends support to separatist groups fighting against government control and argues that a 1972 agreement mandates a resolution to the Kashmir dispute through bilateral talks.

 

[DroneMailini]

because your side started it and we have lost one soldier and one critically injured ...our soldiers blood is more important than any aman ki asha stuff ....rest assure you attack you also will not be safe ....

We are ready for it. You want to use soldiers, Terrorists.
we are ready for any type of warfare.
If you initiate trouble in Jammu and Kashmir we will do the same in FATA
If you initiate trouble in punjab we will do the same in Balochistan.

If you think Covert war is a war with lower cost with rich dividends we are ready for that also.

 

[iam not greek]

We are ready for it. You want to use soldiers, Terrorists.
we are ready for any type of warfare.
If you initiate trouble in Jammu and Kashmir we will do the same in FATA
If you initiate trouble in punjab we will do the same in Balochistan.

If you think Covert war is a war with lower cost with rich dividends we are ready for that also.

plus they have daily drone attacks. in short "aagey bhi yahi show, peeche bhi yahi show"

 

[T-Rex]

who gave bangladeshis right to speak b/w two nuclear powers?

We've decided to be independent, do you remember somebody helped us to be so? So, why not exercise that independence? It's good for the soul, though some bharati malauns don't like it.

 

[SwAggeR]

because your side started it and we have lost one soldier and one critically injured ...our soldiers blood is more important than any aman ki asha stuff ....rest assure you attack you also will not be safe ....

Let's see if your empty words hold any weight or not.