What's new

Indian aggression at LOC

. . .
aksai chin!!! Lol

we are claimung a land where there was no Indian in lasrt 1000 years. we aready capture many parts of Tibet.

Before 1962 war,India and china both had presence of troops in aksai chin.today it is only under china control.

you should know that aksai chin by no mean is a small area
 
.
Before 1962 war,India and china both had presence of troops in aksai chin.today it is only under china control.

you should know that aksai chin by no mean is a small area

They go there still now.... we are talking about an area which was never ours... also entire kashmir has been targeted by big powers after 1947... whoever could capture some places.. settled down there. aksai chin was never part of India... it was always remote.. though we claim it.

Ignoring your BS above, what you really wish is for Pakistan to be Palestine!


No... we want Pakistan to be lyk Japan... stable... economically advanced and dont see others as Hindus or Christians but as Indian or atleast human being.
 
. . . .
Is Pakistan Stil banging doors looking for help in united nations.

Plz plz help us with kashmir siachen and kargil.

The indians stole our water and our land.

The indians stole east Pakistan and now shelling loc
 
.
Waz... i know u for more than 10 years... reading ur posts from some other pak def forums for ling tym.

i want to say only one thing.. PA never needed any order from PM of Pak to do anything.


BSF were ordered by PMO to fight back while prev govt was always asked to clam down and ask fr flag meetngs.

Thats it.

Well that's my point as well. The government has no influence over the army, hence didn't ask anyone to go the UN, which was aimed at the Indian poster who said this was a sign of defeat.
 
Last edited:
.
To a B****** everyone looks one and you ain't an exception. :lol:
 
.
That still means that the force is divided between two fronts.

The Indian media, fed by propaganda from the Modi government machinery, will obviously claim that "the Indian response is heavier, blah, blah, blah ..". Modi ran for election on the basis of being "stronger on national security than Congress", so at the very least the rhetoric and claims during this incident are going to be exaggerated to accommodate Modi's "56 inch chest".

The casualty numbers being provided by both sides are civilian - these are people living in, at times, mud houses instead of concrete bunkers. Basking in glory over how more civilians have been killed on the Pakistani side is a pretty shameful exercise.


Difference b/w ranger and BSF strength and capabilities.

 
. . . .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom