AgNoStiC MuSliM
ADVISORS
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2007
- Messages
- 25,259
- Reaction score
- 87
- Country
- Location
Laughable nonsense - India would first need to know the actual locations of Pakistan's nuclear warheads, in order to target her satellites on those locations, and satellites only provide a "snapshot in time".Pakistan under watch - advanced Indian Satellites Eyeballing the country [RISAT-2] - AA Me, IN
launching nukes on India is not so easy as we have eyes in the sky looking down on Pakistani soil and any indication nukes are being prepared will be met with a wave of Brahmos missiles to those targets.
All this childish ranting and raving is getting pretty old, Modi, the Indian military and the rest of the BJP fart-wagon were pretty adamant that "Pakistan had been given a jaw-breaking response and would not dare to act again, blah, blah, blah ..", well, hours after those childish statements, the firing from both sides continues, so apparently no such "jaw breaking response" ever occurred.View attachment 126613
The director-general of Border Security Force (BSF) got encouraging calls from Prime Minister Narendra Modi, exhorting him to return fire with fire.
"It is rare for a PM to speak directly to the BSF chief... Usually the home minister or the home secretary remain in touch with the DG. But this time, from national security advisor Ajit Doval to the home minister and the PM, he was the direct go-to man,"
"We have decided we will give Pakistan a thrashing for their misadventure this time. We have given them a very solid pounding and the loss on the other side is very heavy," Pathak told ET on Friday. "We have fired many more times the rounds Pakistan has fired.
Devendra Pathak: Meet the soldier who keeps Pakistan in check - The Economic Times
Modi should stop acting like a petulant child, shut up, and act like a mature statesman to resolve the conflict with his counterparts in Pakistan, otherwise he is going to keep looking like a fool with his "we shut Pakistan up and gave them a jaw-breaking response" rants that don't come "true".
Your out-of context distortions might work in convincing other brain-washed Indians, but they won't work here. The Pakistani DM's comments were made in the context of warning India to not continue violating the ceasefire and escalating the situation, pointing out that continued escalation could lead to war, and given that both sides are nuclear powers, the outcome of a war would be tragic.When defence minister of Pakistan wars of Nuclear war , then I suppose the aggressor is Pakistan not India. BSF is a civilian force, none have affiliation with the army. But Pak Rangers are headed by two star rank rank Army officers. Who is the aggressor is no more classified.
Islamabad's dark warning to India as defence minister hints at nuclear response | Daily Mail Online
Also, I fail to see what exactly the civilian led vs military led aspect of the respective paramilitary forces has to do with anything. One could argue that the civilian led BSF is simply incapable of exercising the kind of military discipline necessary to prevent escalation in a "hot zone", and that the lack of military experience on the BSF side is what caused the escalation/provocations to begin.
Last edited: