What a joke.
Again, India was crying that we intruded 20 km into Indian territory for several weeks. And India did not dare to forcibly evict them (which would have been the logical thing to do) because they knew using force might lead to another Sino-Indian war.
Instead, you backed down and granted every concession we asked for. Destroying an entire set of strategic bunkers, halting infrastructure in the region, and cancelling all troop patrols in Chumar.
There is no way around it Janon, India was the one who made concessions, we didn't make any at all. This is obvious to everyone including you.
Your intent here is to try and push the point that "such actions are futile and don't give results". Except that reality is the opposite, your administration is always backing down, such as the threats of "surgical strikes" in retaliation to Mumbai, that never came about.
If you wanted to punish our behaviour, you had several weeks to forcibly evict those Chinese soldiers. But you never did, out of fear (rightfully so) that any use of force, legitimate or not, could have led to another Sino-Indian war. Even though you have no problem shooting "intruders" from Bangladesh and Pakistan, in this case you couldn't.
I have given you enough links quoting the defence ministry as well as armed forces saying that no concessions were given to china. To quote yourself earlier, should I believe them or you?
Straw man references to Mumbai or surgical strikes are all fine. But the point of the discussion, that India made no concessions, has been amply made.
