India Will Never Be the Next China, Morgan Stanley’s Ruchir Sharma Says

[Dungeness]

CEOs are not slaves you dimwit. You are just jealous that no Chinese heading MNCs

They don't have to, they just create their own MNCs!

 

[sinait]

CEOs are not slaves you dimwit. You are just jealous that no Chinese heading MNCs

HA HA, INDIAN Satya Nadela TOILING while Bill Gates go vacationing.
CEO Satya Nadela Net Worth estimated $126,776,626.

Former CEO Bill Gates $104 BILLION
Former CEO Steve Ballmer $46 BILLION.

Alibaba CEO Jack Ma $40 BILLION
Poor Jack Ma, so Jealous of Nadela.

See the DIFFERENCE BOY.
.

 

[lonelyman]

After thousands of years colonial rules, Indians become better serving white masters. Almost second nature now

HA HA, INDIAN Satya Nadela TOILING while Bill Gates go vacationing.
CEO Satya Nadela Net Worth estimated $126,776,626.

Former CEO Bill Gates $104 BILLION
Former CEO Steve Ballmer $46 BILLION.

Alibaba CEO Jack Ma $40 BILLION

See the DIFFERENCE BOY.
.

 

[Dungeness]

HA HA, INDIAN Satya Nadela TOILING while Bill Gates go vacationing.
CEO Satya Nadela Net Worth estimated $126,776,626.

Former CEO Bill Gates $104 BILLION
Former CEO Steve Ballmer $46 BILLION.

Alibaba CEO Jack Ma $40 BILLION
Poor Jack Ma, so Jealous of Nadela.

See the DIFFERENCE BOY.
.

Jack Ma can afford to hire quite a few Indian CEO, COO, CFOs to work in his eCommerce empire. Indians seem to really take great pride for some foreign CEOs being of Indian origin. They do have disgustingly different mentality from Chinese.

 

[IndoCarib]

jealous dumbasses dont know the difference between CEOs and majority stake holders. Jack Ma owns Alibaba. Nadella a CEO

https://www.geekwire.com/2018/micro...tya-nadella-bring-home-25m-2018-compensation/

 

[Shahzaz ud din]

Ruchir Sharma is desh dharoi

 

[rott]

HA HA, INDIAN Satya Nadela TOILING while Bill Gates go vacationing.
CEO Satya Nadela Net Worth estimated $126,776,626.

Former CEO Bill Gates $104 BILLION
Former CEO Steve Ballmer $46 BILLION.

Alibaba CEO Jack Ma $40 BILLION
Poor Jack Ma, so Jealous of Nadela.

See the DIFFERENCE BOY.
.

Their rational thinking is all fked up. Is it something to do with the IQ?

 

[sinait]

jealous dumbasses dont know the difference between CEOs and majority stake holders. Jack Ma owns Alibaba. Nadella a CEO

https://www.geekwire.com/2018/micro...tya-nadella-bring-home-25m-2018-compensation/

Now you know why your IQ is 82.
I am telling you, DON'T BRAG ABOUT SLAVING for the WHITES.
GO STARTUP SOME SUCCESSFUL INDIAN CORPORATION.
Come and Brag about some Indian Corporations, NOT some caretaker managers for already successful US corporations.

Only INDIANS Brag about being CEOs for FOREIGNERS in a foreign country.
BCOZ INDIANS GOT NOTHING TO BE PROUD OF IN INDIA.
Exception being NO.1 in the world for RAPE and for achievements 10000 years ago that nobody can verify.
.

Their rational thinking is all fked up. Is it something to do with the IQ?

LOW IQ is one factor.
I think more to do with INDIANS find satisfaction and fulfillment in SLAVING for their WHITE MASTERS.
Serving their WHITE MASTERS is second nature after centuries of colonization.

Success in a foreign corporation in a foreign land is a personal achievement, not the country where he is born.
It is NOTHING TO BE PROUD OF that they had to leave their SHITHOLE homeland to find success.
.

 

[LeGenD]

Chinese society have a different mindset on the whole, and very sharp people in general. Chinese leadership and administrative structures are also vastly different and result-oriented. India have a democratic orientation which favor 'working relations' between distinct groups (khao aur khilao culture) over 'results' on any given day. Indian bureaucracy is particularly rigid in its character and lazy. This isn't to say that reforms are not possible in India but very slow to materialize in India in comparison to than in China. There is no comparison.

China also benefitted a lot from massive influx of foreign investment since the 1970s. India is not as open, or not as lucky.

 

[nahtanbob]

Jack Ma can afford to hire quite a few Indian CEO, COO, CFOs to work in his eCommerce empire. Indians seem to really take great pride for some foreign CEOs being of Indian origin. They do have disgustingly different mentality from Chinese.

Indians won't work for Chinese when Americans treat them better

 

[beijingwalker]

Indians won't work for Chinese when Americans treat them better

All CEOs of Chinese big companies are Chinese, foreigners can't find their bearings in the Chinese market.

 

[nahtanbob]

All CEOs of Chinese big companies are Chinese, foreigners can't find their bearings in the Chinese market.

the whole comparison is moot
there are plenty of chinese employees in all of the American MNCs

 

[beijingwalker]

the whole comparison is moot
there are plenty of chinese employees in all of the American MNCs

Yes, but not the other way around, the way the Chinese people do business is very different from the west, especially in the Chinese domestic market.

 

[Yaseen1]

india is gutter of world and have dark future.india will end soon and they cannot be compared even with africa

 

[OIO]

India Will Never Be the Next China, Morgan Stanley’s Ruchir Sharma Says
By
Reshma Kapadia
April 7, 2019 7:00 a.m. ET

Forget the India/China comparisons. Apart from the large populations, these two great nations of Asia have nothing in common. Nothing. Everything you say about China, the opposite is basically true of India. Where China is more homogenous, India is as heterogeneous as they come. The risks China’s leaders have taken for economic liberalization are very different compared with what Indian leaders have done over time.

People always think of China as an authoritarian state-driven model, but the share of the Chinese government in the economy has come down dramatically over time. They took some big calculated risks with reforms, often with new leadership—not because of crisis, which is usually the catalyst for other emerging markets. During the reform of the state-owned enterprises in the 1990s, they let go of 70 million employees. That is what kept China ahead of the curve. In the past few years, China is showing some signs of reverting, but that doesn’t’ take away from the big picture. China gave its people much more economic freedom than India did. And that is ironic.

Give us an example of India’s failure in this regard.

Look at demonetization [Modi’s government voided 85% of the currency overnight in November 2016]. India wanted to move to a cashless society, but China has moved to a cashless society much quicker with the private sector. In Beijing or Shanghai today in the middle classes, cash is nonexistent. It happened organically through the tech revolution and the development of some great payment solutions, and not through some massive state intervention or something as draconian as demonetization. India’s not going to become the next China.

https://www.barrons.com/articles/india-china-morgan-stanley-ruchir-sharma-51554492012

industrialization is a long-term evolution, need decades to achieve, but it's hard to keep stable during the time.

India is nervous about CPEC not only because of Kashmir but also industrialization of Pakistan.