What's new

India will become permanent member of UN Security Council: Sushma Swaraj

Green Arrow

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
3,808
Reaction score
5
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
France supported the extension while Russia and China did not make any submission on the issue, Swaraj said.

By: PTI | New Delhi | Updated: April 6, 2017 6:43 pm
sushma-swaraj-7593.jpg


“I am confident that if not this time, then next time, India would become a permanent member of the Security Council,” Sushma Swaraj said. (Representational Image)
Expressing confidence that India would become a permanent member of the UN Security Council, External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj on Thursday said the country expected that the new members would have the same rights, including the veto power, as the existing permanent members.

During the Question Hour in Rajya Sabha, Swaraj said India has all the credentials to become a permanent member of the Security Council and four permanent members, US, UK, France and Russia have extended support.

The fifth member, China, has also “not publicly opposed it”, the External Affairs minister said.

“I am confident that if not this time, then next time, India would become a permanent member of the Security Council,” she said.

To a question whether India would also get the ‘veto’ power, Swaraj said the country wants the same esponsibilities, prerogatives as well as obligations as the current permanent members.

“We don’t want any discrimination between old and new members. We don’t want two classes – that there is a first class and a second class of permanent members. This should make it clear that India wants the same responsibilities, prerogatives and obligations as the current permanent members,” she said.

She said India has been making diplomatic efforts to ensure not only expansion but also reform in the Security Council. She said India wanted expansion of its permanent as well as non-permanent membership of the council.

In her reply tabled in the House, Swaraj said on the issue of extending veto powers to new permanent members in their submission during the inter-governmental negotiation process of the 69th General Assembly, USA and UK opposed extension of veto to new members.

France supported the extension while Russia and China did not make any submission on the issue, she said.

She said discussions were currently on in the UN General Assembly through inter-governmental negotiation and India and other pro-reform groupings have been calling commencement of text based negotiations.
 
. . . .
China is our ally and friend. With their support we are confident that India will not become the 6th member of the UN security council, especially since no muslim country as yet represents it.


Is that the Indian position? ie Your position?
 
.
China is our ally and friend. With their support we are confident that India will not become the 6th member of the UN security council, especially since no muslim country as yet represents it.

Having China as an ally is an asset. However, Pakistan shouldn't be relying on China to do its batting, China will act in its own interest.

What Pakistan should do is sort out its own house and be in a position to demand entry for itself enabling China to use Pakistan as a counter-weight to India's demand either preventing their entry or joining the council with them.
 
. .
'Next time'? :haha:

Maybe when she has been reincarnated a few times over this will happen ... UN may even cease to exist by then!
 
.
Having China as an ally is an asset. However, Pakistan shouldn't be relying on China to do its batting, China will act in its own interest.

What Pakistan should do is sort out its own house and be in a position to demand entry for itself enabling China to use Pakistan as a counter-weight to India's demand either preventing their entry or joining the council with them.
I partly agree. Pakistan should accept India's entry in the council if and only when Pakistan is also accepted. But the world's tyrant US will not accept a country that can veto Israel.
 
.
Exactly !

France supported the extension while Russia and China did not make any submission on the issue, Swaraj said.

By: PTI | New Delhi | Updated: April 6, 2017 6:43 pm
sushma-swaraj-7593.jpg


“I am confident that if not this time, then next time, India would become a permanent member of the Security Council,” Sushma Swaraj said. (Representational Image)
Expressing confidence that India would become a permanent member of the UN Security Council, External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj on Thursday said the country expected that the new members would have the same rights, including the veto power, as the existing permanent members.

During the Question Hour in Rajya Sabha, Swaraj said India has all the credentials to become a permanent member of the Security Council and four permanent members, US, UK, France and Russia have extended support.

The fifth member, China, has also “not publicly opposed it”, the External Affairs minister said.

“I am confident that if not this time, then next time, India would become a permanent member of the Security Council,” she said.

To a question whether India would also get the ‘veto’ power, Swaraj said the country wants the same esponsibilities, prerogatives as well as obligations as the current permanent members.

“We don’t want any discrimination between old and new members. We don’t want two classes – that there is a first class and a second class of permanent members. This should make it clear that India wants the same responsibilities, prerogatives and obligations as the current permanent members,” she said.

She said India has been making diplomatic efforts to ensure not only expansion but also reform in the Security Council. She said India wanted expansion of its permanent as well as non-permanent membership of the council.

In her reply tabled in the House, Swaraj said on the issue of extending veto powers to new permanent members in their submission during the inter-governmental negotiation process of the 69th General Assembly, USA and UK opposed extension of veto to new members.

France supported the extension while Russia and China did not make any submission on the issue, she said.

She said discussions were currently on in the UN General Assembly through inter-governmental negotiation and India and other pro-reform groupings have been calling commencement of text based negotiations.
 
. . . . .
By 2030 they will have to otherwise they lose control and become meaningless.

Besides only on PDF pakistan n India are compared for UNSC positions.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom