India will become permanent member of UN Security Council: Sushma Swaraj

[Arsalan mehmud]

Sorry, I dont understand

Agar samajh aata to UN Security council ka permanent member kab ka ban jata...

 

[Arsalan mehmud]

Elections have no value in Pakistan.

See who is talking...
Koi bhi batan dabao vote ek hi party ko jata hai....

They all are showing how much values are there for election in India...

 

[SorryNotSorry]

According to Durex, Indians are not very well endowed. You will fall into that category. Statistically.

Savage. But, please stick to the topic.

 

[NakedLunch]

Savage. But, please stick to the topic.

I responded to a comment made by your compatriot. This advice will be more befitting to him. Thank you.

 

[phancong]

Another prediction come from India, their wish of become the UN permanent member will never come true. Keep on waiting India someday UN will be dissolved and India will finally be the only member in the UN.

 

[NakedLunch]

Another prediction come from India, their wish of become the UN permanent member will never come true. Keep on waiting India someday UN will be dissolved and India will finally be the only member in the UN.

They will have Bangladesh and Afghanistan to beat up.

 

[volatile]

Why India can never be UNSC permanent member

Firstly a society so much divided in ethnicity and religion that it is bound to collapse .
Secondly with in Hindu caste systems a low cast will never be fully represented .
Poverty levels in India alone is disintegrating the society .
With separatist movement in full swing who knows till 2030 where India will be
Lastly and my favourite part ,current Hindu Govt is Teherke Taliban version of Hindu extremist so by which means India qualifies other than corrupt corporate looting

 

[Indika]

France supported the extension while Russia and China did not make any submission on the issue, Swaraj said.

By: PTI | New Delhi | Updated: April 6, 2017 6:43 pm

“I am confident that if not this time, then next time, India would become a permanent member of the Security Council,” Sushma Swaraj said. (Representational Image)
Expressing confidence that India would become a permanent member of the UN Security Council, External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj on Thursday said the country expected that the new members would have the same rights, including the veto power, as the existing permanent members.

During the Question Hour in Rajya Sabha, Swaraj said India has all the credentials to become a permanent member of the Security Council and four permanent members, US, UK, France and Russia have extended support.

The fifth member, China, has also “not publicly opposed it”, the External Affairs minister said.

“I am confident that if not this time, then next time, India would become a permanent member of the Security Council,” she said.

To a question whether India would also get the ‘veto’ power, Swaraj said the country wants the same esponsibilities, prerogatives as well as obligations as the current permanent members.

“We don’t want any discrimination between old and new members. We don’t want two classes – that there is a first class and a second class of permanent members. This should make it clear that India wants the same responsibilities, prerogatives and obligations as the current permanent members,” she said.

She said India has been making diplomatic efforts to ensure not only expansion but also reform in the Security Council. She said India wanted expansion of its permanent as well as non-permanent membership of the council.

In her reply tabled in the House, Swaraj said on the issue of extending veto powers to new permanent members in their submission during the inter-governmental negotiation process of the 69th General Assembly, USA and UK opposed extension of veto to new members.

France supported the extension while Russia and China did not make any submission on the issue, she said.

She said discussions were currently on in the UN General Assembly through inter-governmental negotiation and India and other pro-reform groupings have been calling commencement of text based negotiations.

she should shut her mouth and keep quiet on matters where she does not have expertise. UN is a dummy organization created by selfish powers. Becoming strong should be our goal we can do whatever we want. This is how international politics run by powerful ones ,become one not hanker for one.

 

[Navin A]

US CHINA Founding father never took any dispute to UN or made a false promise in UN.. that bluffing culture only belongs to India...

Are you lost or what?what about the SCS and the haigue ruling. You have no idea of what your talking about!

 

[SQ8]

In all honesty, India shoud have a seat on the council based on it representing a significant portion of the world's population and soon global GDP. but is currently not mature enough to be qualified for one.

 

[Navin A]

In all honesty, India shoud have a seat on the council based on it representing a significant portion of the world's population and soon global GDP. but is currently not mature enough to be qualified for one.

Please define mature; and also elaborate the circumstances on why you think India is not mature?

 

[randomradio]

but is currently not mature enough to be qualified for one.

What is this 'maturity' that you speak of?

 

[Star Expedition]

Will that make India peaceful?
If no, why should it happen?

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

There was only one requirement to become a UNSC P5 member... to have been a major independent power on the Allied side of WW2 in 1945.

That's all.

India did not exist in 1945, so they did not qualify. And Britain already had a P5 seat.

 

[Navin A]

There was only one requirement to become a UNSC P5 member... to have been a major independent power on the Allied side of WW2 in 1945.

That's all.

India did not exist in 1945, so they did not qualify. And Britain already had a P5 seat.

Throw that logic in the garbage bin, as far as we are concerned, India has been an active part of the world war 1 & world war 2. There have been substantial contributions to the allied forces. If one goes by the logic that is (regrettably) in was a colonial state under the British rule, so it has more association & qualification to be under this requirement.

Just because you explode a bomb at an earlier a date does not make you a legitimate candidate. The p5 nations are a joke and the UN itself is a Useless organisation itself. In this time and date, it hold's no relevance. just a bunch of world leaders with everlasting ego's, little to no moral's/ethics. Their weakness is in their stupid pride, unable to let go of their mantle's. The UN is the most incompetent body to the turmoils that is happening in the world, this inaction to the conflicts is a testament to their incompetence.

As far as I am concerned India should just say screw the P5 & UN & continue with development and pursue her interest's. China being on the P5 is the joke of millennia, the worst offender of human rights records, an exorbitant amount other issues it does not comply with. It's a farcical having it there on the world stage.