In India Foreign affairs are not run by one person and given the fact that India has perfectly good foreign policy, there is very little chance of any change and for non alignment, barring 50's and 60's, India was never non aligned in true sense.The only change possible is that he could be more pro-China and anti-US but even that is complicated by our relations with Japan .
And Muslims are not on a good terms with him,at least Sunnis of UP. Of 543 seats, polling has concluded on nearly 150-200 seats and according to exit polls nearly 7% Muslims from Western part of state of UP and 22% Muslims from state of Bihar have voted in his favour. He has support of Gujarati Bohra Muslims because of his excellent administrative record in Gujarat.Shias as far as i know are voting for him in UP due to marginalization by parties seeking Sunni vote while in Delhi,Shias have voted for a new party AAP, Sunnis have gone with Congress. Bengali Muslims vote for Trinmool congress or Communist while malyali Muslims vote for either Congress + Muslim league or communist. Hyedrabadi Muslims vote for MIM.
His relations with Muslims are bad due to Gujarat riots. In 2002 Godhra's Muslims set a train carrying Hindu pilgrims, who were also member of VHP on fire killing 59 people. In response to that nearly 840 Muslims were killed in retaliatory attack over the period of three days. He is blamed by media of not controlling riots on time in order to visit retribution on Muslims.Even though in his defense, he has exonerated by SC of any wrong doing no riot has taken place in Gujarat since 2002 and he is fighting on the plank of being a good administrator who would bring Economic prosperity.
BJP being cadre driven party is certainly more Democratic than Congress which is a dynasty driven party and i daresay BJP is even more secular than Congress but that has more to do with Congress being a exploitative leech which uses religion as excuse to hide it's failure.
In India Foreign affairs are not run by one person and given the fact that India has perfectly good foreign policy, there is very little chance of any change and for non alignment, barring 50's and 60's, India was never non aligned in true sense.The only change possible is that he could be more pro-China and anti-US but even that is complicated by our relations with Japan .
I see. Despite the difference of the several political parties which ruled India, most of them agreed on maintaining fixed foreign policy codes, regardless of the person in position. Even here, foreign policy makings change from time to time.
So far India had shown its goodwill toward China, I hope Pakistan and India will fallow the same path. I don't think China is viewing the progressive course of the Indo-Japanese relations negatively to such an extent. However, I think China might feel a bit nervous about the nuclear cooperation deal India inked with Japan.
We should also give India a credit for rejecting NATO's proposal to join them in the Ballistic Defense Systems as well as the Joint Maritime Cooperation.
And Muslims are not on a good terms with him,at least Sunnis of UP. Of 543 seats, polling has concluded on nearly 150-200 seats and according to exit polls nearly 7% Muslims from Western part of state of UP and 22% Muslims from state of Bihar have voted in his favour. He has support of Gujarati Bohra Muslims because of his excellent administrative record in Gujarat.Shias as far as i know are voting for him in UP due to marginalization by parties seeking Sunni vote while in Delhi,Shias have voted for a new party AAP, Sunnis have gone with Congress. Bengali Muslims vote for Trinmool congress or Communist while malyali Muslims vote for either Congress + Muslim league or communist. Hyedrabadi Muslims vote for MIM.
So practically speaking, Modi enjoys a relatively small support of Muslims across India. Did this come due to his political affiliations or for ignoring India's secularism idealism for them?
If the Gujarato Bohra Muslims are supporting him as well as the Bengal Muslims, Shias, and Hyderabadi Muslims then I guess it is safe to say that his policies received mixed views.
His relations with Muslims are bad due to Gujarat riots. In 2002 Godhra's Muslims set a train carrying Hindu pilgrims, who were also member of VHP on fire killing 59 people. In response to that nearly 840 Muslims were killed in retaliatory attack over the period of three days. He is blamed by media of not controlling riots on time in order to visit retribution on Muslims.Even though in his defense, he has exonerated by SC of any wrong doing no riot has taken place in Gujarat since 2002 and he is fighting on the plank of being a good administrator who would bring Economic prosperity.
These two accidents came as a result of a circle of a sectarian mayhem, if his cabinet didn't take enough countermeasures to avoid a civil unrest then he ought to be blamed. If not, then he should be hold accountable.
BJP being cadre driven party is certainly more Democratic than Congress which is a dynasty driven party and i daresay BJP is even more secular than Congress but that has more to do with Congress being a exploitative leech which uses religion as excuse to hide it's failure
@
anonymus
I edited my post. I apologize for making your head spinning.
Do Hindu, Muslim, Christian, Sikh Congressmen, Congresswomen politically coexist in harmony with one another? I mean, do they put India's interests before their communities?
Do they seek after exposing the BJP's policies on religious grounds?
What do Hindu Congressmen, Congresswomen think about the BJP?
Will write a detailed post about it tomorrow . The modi issue is neither white nor black . It's in 50 shades of grey .
Hey there, it's been a while since we talked. I hope you're doing well and good.
Looking forward to seeing your response.