What's new

India warns of joint Sino-Pakistani border threat

Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh really?

We had balls to cross border and FIGHT with 10X bigger country..We tried ! We succeeded at some sectors.We failed at others..

You military don't even have balls and again to fight with some 10X SMALLER COUNTRY? (Facepalm)

Why you guys rant about "handling Pak with one hand" blah blah? Inferiority complex,han? Get over it bhartis....For heaven Sake..No one need to mention that he can handle his rival by "one hand"...Can't you guys post without pitiful self-imaginations?

Oh by the way,your Army had great 'military victory' in the Eastern sector:lol: Be happy on your 'great' military victory in fighting a rival Army during a civil war...Be pround Bhartis (Facepalm)

yes you attacked and failed to defeat india,be proud of the achievement,india has nothing to gain by attacking pakistan and pakistan has nothing to lose by attacking india
initiating war should become a basic right in pakistan
 
.
It was on topic. And here we go, when a bharati's post gets dissected, they pretty much divert from all of it, and start attacking me. How typical and normal. :lol:

keep to the topic please, is a personal attack.

Calling other idiots, is a logical reply.

All these bombs are making em crazy. Drama queens.
 
.
Oh really?

We had balls to cross border and FIGHT with 10X bigger country..We tried ! We succeeded at some sectors.We failed at others..

You military don't even have balls and again to fight with some 10X SMALLER COUNTRY? (Facepalm)

Why you guys rant about "handling Pak with one hand" blah blah? Inferiority complex,han? Get over it bhartis....For heaven Sake..No one need to mention that he can handle his rival by "one hand"...Can't you guys post without pitiful self-imaginations?

Oh by the way,your Army had great 'military victory' in the Eastern sector:lol: Be happy on your 'great' military victory in fighting a rival Army that was already engaged in a civil war...Be pround Bhartis (Facepalm)

I think you dont have balls to cross the border, you have fools to cross the border...

We are not guys like you who crosses the border and crying for help from America(Bill Clinton during Kargil war).

Remember the 1965 war we crossed the border and captured few parts in the Lahore districts.

File:Brig.Hari Singh at Barkee Capture.jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
.
You couldn't do anything, because you know that America needs Pakistan for the War on Terror, and China needs Pakistan for Gwadar/Pipelines/KKH.

Pakistan+America+China was too much for you.

Also, where is the evidence that the Pakistani government was responsible for the Mumbai attacks?

Has the UN declared that the Pakistani government is repsponsible? No.

Washington: US lawmakers have put restrictions on $50 million of US military aid to Pakistan out of concern that the country is backsliding on anti-terrorism efforts and democratic reform. But the measure also provided the Bush administration with a way to restore the funding.

The restrictions came in a measure that allocates up to $300 million for aid to Pakistan.
US Congress restricts military aid to Pakistan - World News - IBNLive

As far as Pakistan being responsible, anyone who has access to international news is aware of the same. Hint: Kasab, Hint 2: Headley.

UN?

Yes, very effective.

China does not support action against Gaddafi and then takes OIL from the rebels!

Hypocrisy for you and that too from a Permanent Member of the UNSC!!

That much for the UN!!
 
.
Oh no mate....we were too scared to attack you after mumbai attacks...infact ,"land of the pure" cannot be attacked. Leave us poor bharatiyas alone. *shudder*

So sarcasm to the rescue. :lol:
 
.
Pakistani govt is responsible because

1) they banned LET after the parliament attacks, acknowledging that they are terrorists, but in reality allowed hafeez saeed and his people to run a new org called JUD at the muridke headquarters, i.e. allowed the same terrorists to run a new org under a new nameplate at the same training camp. is that how china understands about banning an org? I'm sure not.

2) Secondly, even today JUD, a banned terrorists org, as per GOP and UN is able to print fund raising advertisements in mainstream newspapers and the govt looks the other way. is that possible in a responsible country like china? answer honestly and you will know how the pakistani govt plays a double game and is totally responsible for protecting these assets.

But where is the solid proof?

The kind of proof, that would lead the UN, or national governments, to officially declare that the Pakistani government is responsible?

I thought it was "innocent until proven guilty"?
 
.
Friendly advice lads.....please dont bring up anything to derail discussion.

Eg: mumbai attacks.
 
.
But where is the solid proof?

The kind of proof, that would lead the UN, or national governments, to officially declare that the Pakistani government is responsible?

I thought it was "innocent until proven guilty"?

Solid proof??? UN? Where China protected JUD three times before relenting after mumbai attacks? Arent we innocent little angels LOL. For a moment I thought you were asking sincerely ;) thanks for clarifying that.

A government protecting terrorists is proof enough. A terrorist organisation allowed to openly operate and raise money while on paper banning it so that China can protect them at UNSC using that flimsy excuse is good enough for karma ;) and karma we see in action, thanks for watching the show.

BTW, whats the need to declare pakistan a terrorist state in UN??? What practical advantage does that have??? Absolutely none. What punishment pakistan gets, what medium, what manner, intensity - does not worry india or china, lets not pretend otherwise.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom