India vs. China – the elephant can not fly like the dragon unless winged

[Chinese-Dragon]

by that logic indians are similar to chinse....

Not really.

The only thing I can think of is Buddhism, which originated in Nepal and is no longer followed in India.

And the vast majority of Chinese are atheist now anyway.

 

[FairAndUnbiased]

From my experience, Indians have the house slave syndrome. It is a well documented psychiatric condition. I am not saying that all Indians are crazy. Far from it. Sometimes, a completely well behaved people, when formed into a group, will exhibit striking collective behavior.

 

[divya]

Not really.

The only thing I can think of is Buddhism, which originated in Nepal and is no longer followed in India.

And the vast majority of Chinese are atheist now anyway.

check out north eastern states of India.

 

[seethru]

Not really.

The only thing I can think of is Buddhism, which originated in Nepal and is no longer followed in India.

And the vast majority of Chinese are atheist now anyway.

Deliberately distorting or ignorance. Nepalese were always Hindus. The only thing they had to do with Buddhism is that the birth place of Lord Buddha is Nepal(he was the son of a King). Everything else, it's India.

India conquered and dominated China culturally for 20 centuries without ever having to send a single soldier across her border.
--Hu Shih, quoted in Consolation of Mind (2004)

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

check out north eastern states of India.

Yes, North East Indians are of Tibeto-Burmese descent.

But just because someone looks slightly East Asian, doesn't make them similar to Chinese (or even East Asians).

Deliberately distorting or ignorance. Nepalese were always Hindus. The only thing they had to do with Buddhism is that the birth place of Lord Buddha is Nepal(he was the son of a King). Everything else, it's India.

This BS that everything that happened in the subcontinent belongs to India doesn't work with anyone except Indians.

Buddha was born in what is now modern day Nepal, and the Indus Valley Civilization (the source of all the so-called Indian inventions) is based in what is now modern day Pakistan.

 

[NirmalKrish]

Yes, we Chinese judge you because you think whites are better people than Chinese. People like you are hanjian. Your beliefs are hideous, disgraceful and a threat to the Chinese nation. Hanjian Chinese people are a cancer that must be cut off before it overwhelms the whole body. It is actually imperative on all right thinking Chinese people to criticize and humiliate people like you to show our strong national will power defeating China's internal enemies.

You are obviously on this website just to learn English. And you probably think learning English makes you superior to your Chinese friends who don't know English, and you brag about how "Westernized" you are to them. You think white people are morally good people and you want to move to a Western country, but you need more money, so you try to learn more English and hope white people will give you money one day because of your fine English ability.

post reported and you can Indian’s racists lol you hypocrite just shot yourself in the foot.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

Look yellow commie,

When Japan was indeed truly ******* you, you ran up to those same white masters. In fact your whole achievements are some form of aping those very white masters. Evidently, you are still doing that as we speak.

What a classy Indian.

 

[divya]

Yes, North East Indians are of Tibeto-Burmese descent.

But just because someone looks slightly East Asian, doesn't make them similar to Chinese (or even East Asians).


.

So isint Tibet part of China... Tibetian looks are also chinese looks and so are indian looks. for a laymen its hard to distinguish between the two.

But then again come back what was the whole point?

 

[seethru]

Yes, North East Indians are of Tibeto-Burmese descent.

But just because someone looks slightly East Asian, doesn't make them similar to Chinese (or even East Asians).



This BS that everything that happened in the subcontinent belongs to India doesn't work with anyone except Indians.

Buddha was born in what is now modern day Nepal, and the Indus Valley Civilization (the source of all the so-called Indian inventions) is based in what is now modern day Pakistan.

Where have the people of India come from? From heaven?

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

So isint Tibet part of China... Tibetian looks are also chinese looks and so are indian looks. for a laymen its hard to distinguish between the two.

But then again come back what was the whole point?

The point is that China and India share nearly nothing in common, apart from large populations.

 

[seethru]

So isint Tibet part of China... Tibetian looks are also chinese looks and so are indian looks. for a laymen its hard to distinguish between the two.

But then again come back what was the whole point?

of course Tibet is not part of china. They occupied it now on the basis that they were always the part of china i.e., during the dynastic rulers just like CPC

 

[beijingwalker]

India conquered and dominated China culturally for 20 centuries without ever having to send a single soldier across her border.
--Hu Shih, quoted in Consolation of Mind (2004)

really,first,Buddhism in China,Korea and Japan is way different from the ones practiced in other regions,it had been long sinicized,and Chinese culture for the most part is confucianism based,and confucianism is very typically practiced in Eastern Asian countries and regions(Mainland China,Hongkong,Taiwan,Singapore,Korea,Japan and to a lesser extent Vietnam),that makes all Eastern Asian cultures closely connected with each other cause there are so many similarities between them.Southern Asian countries are very different from Eastern Asian countries.there is almost no similarities between Chinese culture and Indian culture at all.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

of course Tibet is not part of china. They occupied it now on the basis that they were always the part of china i.e., during the dynastic rulers just like CPC

Tibet is a part of China. Not ONE single Government in the entire world recognizes Tibet as an independent state. (Including your own Indian government).

Kashmir on the other hand, is internationally recognized (by the UN as well) as disputed territory.

 

[beijingwalker]

of course Tibet is not part of china. They occupied it now on the basis that they were always the part of china i.e., during the dynastic rulers just like CPC

Tibet is part of China accepted by the whole international community,tell me one country who doesnt think so.but India controlled Kashmir is a region occupied by India,and the world map shows that region is"disputed".

 

[seethru]

The point is that China and India share nearly nothing in common, apart from large populations.

NO, You fall under our cultural sphere for centuries. ie., same thought and philosophy my dear Chinese bro.

Map showing the prevalence of "Abrahamic religion" (purple), and "Indian religion" (yellow)