Wet Shirt Contest
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2012
- Messages
- 634
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
India should maintain a distance from USA, sooner or later USA will see rise of India as a threat to its supremacy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
India doesn't get access to top tier US technology and US bases (on same terms US will use ours)?
Look at some point you have to bite the bullet and pick a side to accelerate military and tech development at the highest level.
You do a disservice to yourself in thinking India will become overly-dependent on the US or will be its lackey.
India is way too large for that.
Have you for example looked at how the US and Russia conducted relations under the Yeltsin regime? Why do you think that regime acquiesed to US demands not to sell the 2nd round of cryo engines to India? It was because there was a real push to get a semi-formal alliance going between them...and it was gathering quite a lot of momentum at one point. Now when Putin came to power in late 90s, he put the brake on it a bit and then really reversed it later....do you think India would be unable to do the same should it feel it needs to?
India doesn't get access to top tier US technology and US bases (on same terms US will use ours)?
Look at some point you have to bite the bullet and pick a side to accelerate military and tech development at the highest level.
You do a disservice to yourself in thinking India will become overly-dependent on the US or will be its lackey.
India is way too large for that.
Have you for example looked at how the US and Russia conducted relations under the Yeltsin regime? Why do you think that regime acquiesed to US demands not to sell the 2nd round of cryo engines to India? It was because there was a real push to get a semi-formal alliance going between them...and it was gathering quite a lot of momentum at one point. Now when Putin came to power in late 90s, he put the brake on it a bit and then really reversed it later....do you think India would be unable to do the same should it feel it needs to?
@hellfire SShhhh
A sample to understand what it says ..
View attachment 329625
View attachment 329631
View attachment 329630
@Nilgiri - Bang on the money but look at the point 5. Beautifully omitted is surveillance Radars or such type of tracking instruments..
SO what if such a tracking device finds its way to A&N and may be in west Lakshdeep side..
Even the UK doesn't get top tier US tech
The flip side is that this becomes a new gateway for CIA to infiltrate India.
People are not aware but most nations have the largest spy network in "friendly countries". E.g. Mossad has a huge network in India. Especially in GoI / MoD. KGB had a huge network in India in the past.
So one of the Risks and Action point would be to make our own agencies aware and alert. (easier said than done).
Russia could oppose US because it aligned itself with China. Even then Russian economy shrunk last year.
Yup, India has to of course take all the precautions needed. I am pretty sure the higher ups already have an action plan to put into place if/when LEMOA signing happens.
I can guarantee that its not going to happen. KGB had a field day in India, so did Mossad. CIA is far more accomplished and there are plenty of "secular" Indians willing to "negotiate" a better life.
Devyani Khobragade got jail time and anal probe while her Maid got US citizenship and so did her Driver Husband who used to work for an American embassy official. ....... and all this before signing LEMOA.
The flip side is that this becomes a new gateway for CIA to infiltrate India.
People are not aware but most nations have the largest spy network in "friendly countries". E.g. Mossad has a huge network in India. Especially in GoI / MoD. KGB had a huge network in India in the past.
So one of the Risks and Action point would be to make our own agencies aware and alert. (easier said than done).
Russia could oppose US because it aligned itself with China. Even then Russian economy shrunk last year.
You don't need LEMOA for that
CIA is already entrenched if thats what you mean. I am talking more along the lines of high level military stuff....but yes there will be the inevitable increase even there from just the sheer increase in contact.
Might as well get the maximum from US in return.....overall I think it should be a worthy agreement.
I agree. This is not a good move.
This is what the map looks like,
This makes it possible for the IN to operate freely in that region and expand its operational foot print. It prepares IN for the future. Not to mention the opportunity for IAF to expand ITS operational foot print.
We have individually negotiated with Vietnam and they will welcome us when the time comes.
In fact IN has started visiting Thailand and Cambodia regularly now to gain experience in operating in those waters and develop deeper relations and future allies. It helps if we demonstrate CLEAR INTENT to operate in that seas.
This agreement with the US demonstrates our Intent and Resolve to the rest of the nations of the world. This will especially bring relief for the smaller nations around China sea. It brings them another potential ally, another rival to chinese threats.
India is already a democracy and no foreign will can undermine our own collective will. Your logic is scrambled by 'Fear'. M.E is a mess with our without India, but now India gets to insist on a continuing US base in Afghanistan so that Indian intelligence can operate safely in Afghanistan.
N.K is a wild card. Its best to ignore them. Not provoke them further. N.K has NOTHING to loose so they would welcome a war. They are Itching for a good fight. Same as pakistan. Strategy for dealing with a self destructive psycho is to leave them alone.
Finally as I have already said, the choice is between the Devil or the deep sea. We get into an agreement but with OUR EYES OPEN.
Nope. I mean all this happened BEFORE CIA was entrenched.
Now imagine what will happen when CIA gets entrenched. How many politicians in their payrolls ? How many news papers ? editors ? media channels ?
They can control the narrative.
Expect more of "religious intolerance" castigations. More Indians deposing before US congress.
Its a deal with the Devil. So expect a bit of Hell and I don't think India is ready to handle that kind of Hell.
What the East India company did, the CIA can do better.
Are we talking about SCS only or does India have any plans for East China Sea & Sea of Japan
What is the purpose for India to operate in those regions? If it is economical then does India have any other deal than the Oil & Gas exploration deal with Vietnam? Since Vietnam is close to both Russia & India, couldn't India have a bilateral agreement?
For operations in SCS & Gulf of Thailand , An agreement with Vietnam is more than sufficient.
How many people here think that the incumbent government is working for the best interests of the country?
That says it all why there is no opposition.
The incumbent government has been successful in using Nationalism as political tool and the tragic results are for everyone to see.
India should maintain a distance from USA, sooner or later USA will see rise of India as a threat to its supremacy.
Modi is the best thing that happened to India in a long time. India is making some bold moves and for the first time is deciding out own destiny rather than wait for things to happen.
Literally taking the Bull by the horns. No one expected India to take such bold decisions and step up to play in the big boys arena. Indians have been waiting for far too long for someone with a spine to take charge. Modi is only doing what the public want him to do.
I am all for signing the agreement with US, but its only fair to warn Indians about the pitfalls of this deal.
End of the day, India has to choose the lesser of the two evil.
The idea is to have as many friends as possible in that area.
If these countries cared about India's security and friendship, would they have leaked the Scorpene documents?
It was an Australian newspaper that sourced it from some East Asian countries...how is Australia to be blamed for it?
There's scores of leakages of sensitive information the world over..This is one of them.