What's new

India to participate in anti-terror drills in Pakistan

N.Siddiqui

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 21, 2015
Messages
9,714
Reaction score
13
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
SCO member states including India to participate in anti-terror drills in Pakistan

Contingents also expected from other SCO member states

News Desk | March 22, 2021



India will be participating in joint anti-terror drills to be held in Pakistan under the umbrella of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), reported Indian media.

The drills will be held in Pabbi, home of Pakistan's counter-terror school, and the decision to hold the exercises was announced during the 36th meeting of the Council of the Regional Anti-Terrorist Structure (RATS) held in Tashkent, Uzbekistan, on March 18.

Apart from India, China, Russia and other SCO states will be sending their contingents to take part in the drills.

“Decisions have been made to improve cooperation between the competent authorities of the SCO member states in identifying and suppressing channels that finance terrorist activities," China's state-run Xinhua news agency had reported earlier while quoting an SCO statement.

Since becoming an SCO member in 2017, Pakistan has been actively participating at all levels in various moots including foreign affairs, defence, national security, economy and trade, science and technology, youth and women empowerment, tourism and media.

The organisation was created to resolve issues related to border management and security but later its scope was widened. At present, SCO is the biggest regional organisation in terms of its size and population. Its members constitute about 45% of the world population, 23% of land mass and 25% of gross domestic product (GDP) of the entire world. The total worth of GDP is $14.5 trillion.


 
Last edited:
. .
what changed all of a sudden...???? Is Kashmir on the table. Something is not adding up.. if India need access to Central asian markets then Kashmir should be resolved. And Secondly, no role in afghanistan... did pakistan put these conditions on the table ?
 
Last edited:
.
what changed all of a sudden...????
China arm twisting India to behave and be a good boy.

The reason China disengaged with India... India had no chance but to loose more ground. And China is all about trade and exports, connectivity and cooperation. The west see it differently of course.

India looking at pros and cons.
 
. .
what changed all of a sudden...???? Is Kashmir on the table. Something is not adding up.. if India need access to Central asian markets then Kashmir should be resolved. And Secondly, no role in afghanistan... did pakistan put these conditions on the table ?
Still not certain about the outcome, fluid situation, lots of grey areas.

Think India is realizing or pretending to realize that it is the region which grows, can learn from China, and stop that redundant 3rd century Chanakya ideology of coercion and control on neighbors.

Don't have to believe her.
 
.
what changed all of a sudden...???? Is Kashmir on the table. Something is not adding up.. if India need access to Central asian markets then Kashmir should be resolved. And Secondly, no role in afghanistan... did pakistan put these conditions on the table ?
I believe the territories we hold are gonna be the same. Turn LoC into IB and open up borders for trade
 
.
I believe the territories we hold are gonna be the same. Turn LoC into IB and open up borders for trade



Screen Shot 2021-03-22 at 2.15.44 PM.png


I was thinking more on these lines.
 
. . .
Still not certain about the outcome, fluid situation, lots of grey areas.

Think India is realizing or pretending to realize that it is the region which grows, can learn from China, and stop that redundant 3rd century Chanakya ideology of coercion and control on neighbors.

Don't have to believe her.
You are so much in awe of Chanakya. Atleast know the proper century he was in. It was not 3rd century, it was negative 3rd century.
And you should also feel proud of him, as he did his studies in Takshshila University and was also a professor there.
 
.
It definitely makes better sense to let bygones be bygones and accept LoC as IB. Both sides have come to realize that the cost of unilaterally modifying LoC is nothing short of M.A.D (Mutually assured destruction). The cost of maintaining the peace has been slowing our development and now we are getting into a global arms race which isn't good for anyone except the global arms industry. All these efforts are better redirected at promoting development & harmony. A long way before the trust deficit is closed but if can be a good start.
 
. .
Indians have probably realised if they start war with either pak or China they will get ducked from 2nd side. If they start war with Pakistan they will have to deal with China. If they start war with China they will have to deal with pak. So they are making peace with pak as to not get sandwiched?
 
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom