What's new

India to give free medicine to hundreds of millions

^ i live in canada. both canada and usa are basicaly same. in canada healthcare is free but still medicenes cost in 100s of dollars and doctors here are rookies i would say. indian doctors are more experienced. ok we may not be having high tech machines for cancer patients in india but for normal patients india is much better. i dont what diffenrece they talk abbout between indian and usa hospitals as i dont find much differnce

Wrong..we have

Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

One of my aunts had brain tumour. She was operated upon at Trivandrum MC and got her radiation therapy from above (free of charge)
 
OK seriosly guys, we might not have a general health care system like in other countries for ALL parts of India, but we are improving and this government decision is already a good step ahead. And if you have enough money, you can get any world class treatment in India too!
 
OK seriosly guys, we might not have a general health care system like in other countries for ALL parts of India, but we are improving and this government decision is already a good step ahead. And if you have enough money, you can get any world class treatment in India too!

True, except for fat cats and politicians no one now goes outside India for treatment. A distant relative of mine had a successful liver transplant at Amritha Hospital..something unthinkable a few years back.
 
According to you what makes a hospital world class and don't say AC,LCD TV and glass cladded buildings as almost all private hospitals are like this.

According to him that is the definition :lol:

He hasn't even seen Indian multi speciality hospitals but is proudly claiming that Indian hospitals are inferior

^ i live in canada. both canada and usa are basicaly same. in canada healthcare is free but still medicenes cost in 100s of dollars and doctors here are rookies i would say. indian doctors are more experienced. ok we may not be having high tech machines for cancer patients in india but for normal patients india is much better. i dont what diffenrece they talk abbout between indian and usa hospitals as i dont find much differnce

We actually have one of the best cancer tech in Asia
Almost all the cancer therapies are available except for some rare cancers

True, except for fat cats and politicians no one now goes outside India for treatment. A distant relative of mine had a successful liver transplant at Amritha Hospital..something unthinkable a few years back.

Yeah ..
Salman Khan went to USA for treating Sciatica ..
The surgery for which is done in India

Recently Sonia Gandhi went to US for the lame disease again
These people give India a bad name
 
The move to give generic medicine free is to make affordable medical to the poor masses. Rich people are free to choose the medical care they want.

I hope govt implement this policy with proper check. Let the generic medicine compete with the non generic one. Competition will only bring positive changes to medicine industry.
 
According to him that is the definition :lol:

He hasn't even seen Indian multi speciality hospitals but is proudly claiming that Indian hospitals are inferior



We actually have one of the best cancer tech in Asia
Almost all the cancer therapies are available except for some rare cancers



Yeah ..
Salman Khan went to USA for treating Sciatica ..
The surgery for which is done in India

Recently Sonia Gandhi went to US for the lame disease again
These people give India a bad name

They propably want to stay away from masses of followers during the treatment thats why
 
India has put in place a $5.4 billion policy to provide free medicine to its people, a decision that could change the lives of hundreds of millions, but a ban on branded drugs stands to cut Big Pharma out of the windfall.

From city hospitals to tiny rural clinics, India's public doctors will soon be able to prescribe free generic drugs to all comers, vastly expanding access to medicine in a country where public spending on health was just $4.50 per person last year.

The plan was quietly adopted last year but not publicised. Initial funding has been allocated in recent weeks, officials said.

Under the plan, doctors will be limited to a generics-only drug list and face punishment for prescribing branded medicines, a major disadvantage for pharmaceutical giants in one of the world's fastest-growing drug markets.

"Without a doubt, it is a considerable blow to an already beleaguered industry, recently the subject of several disadvantageous decisions in India," said KPMG partner Chris Stirling, who is European head of Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals.

"Pharmaceutical firms will likely rethink their emerging markets strategies carefully to take account of this development, and any similar copycat moves across other geographies," he added.

But the initiative would overhaul a system where healthcare is often a luxury and private clinics account for four times as much spending as state hospitals, despite 40 percent of the people living below the poverty line, or $1.25 a day or less.

Within five years, up to half of India's 1.2 billion people are likely to take advantage of the scheme, the government says. Others are likely to continue visiting private hospitals and clinics, where the scheme will not operate.

"The policy of the government is to promote greater and rational use of generic medicines that are of standard quality," said L.C. Goyal, additional secretary at the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and a key proponent of the policy.

"They are much, much cheaper than the branded ones."

Global drugmakers like Pfizer GlaxoSmithKline and Merck will be hit. They spend billions of dollars a year researching new treatments and target huge growth for branded medicine in emerging economies such as India, where generics account for around 90 percent of drug sales by value, far more than in developed countries.

U.S.-based Abbott Laboratories, which bought an Indian generics maker in 2010, is the biggest seller of drugs, both branded and generic, in India, followed by GlaxoSmithKline.

BIG PHARMA BLUES

In March, India granted its first ever compulsory license, allowing a domestic drugmaker to manufacture a copy-cat version of Nexavar, a cancer drug developed by Germany's Bayer, unnerving foreign drugmakers that fear a lack of intellectual property protection in emerging markets.

That enabled India's Natco Pharma to sell its generic version of Nexavar at 8,800 rupees per monthly dose, a fraction of the 280,000 rupees Bayer's version cost.

In another blow to Big Pharma's emerging market ambitions, China recently overhauled regulations to grant authorities the power to allow domestic drugmakers to produce cheap copies of medicines protected by patents.

Emerging markets are on track to make up 28 percent of global pharmaceuticals sales by 2015, up from 12 percent in 2005, according to IMS Health, a healthcare information and services company.

Most sales in emerging markets come from branded generics, which are off-patent drugs priced at a premium to those made by local manufacturers.

The Organisation of Pharmaceutical Producers of India (OPPI), a lobby group for multinational drugmakers in the country, argues that the price of drugs is just one factor in access to healthcare and that the scheme need not be detrimental to manufacturers of branded drugs.

"I think this will hasten overall growth of the pharmaceutical industry, as poor patients who could not afford will now have access to essential medicines," said Tapan Ray, director general of OPPI.

About 600 billion rupees in drugs are sold each year in India, or 482 billion at wholesale. Drugs covered under the new policy account for about 60 percent of existing sales, or 290 billion rupees at wholesale cost.

The government's annual cost is likely to be lower due to bulk purchasing and because patients at private clinics would still pay for their own drugs. States will pay for 25 percent of the free drugs and the central government will cover the rest.

Under various existing programmes, around 250 million people, or less than a quarter of India's population, now receive free medicines, according to the health ministry.

India's new policy, to be implemented by the end of 2012 and rolled out nationwide within two years, is expected to provide 52 percent of the population with free drugs by April 2017, at a cumulative cost of 300 billion rupees.

That requires a major funding ramp-up from a deficit-strapped government. The scheme has been granted just 1 billion rupees thus far from central government coffers.

STRICT INSTRUCTIONS

Public doctors will be able to spend 5 percent of the budget, equivalent to around $50 million a year, on drugs outside of the government's list, on branded drugs or on medicines that are not on the list. Beyond that, they can be punished, said Goyal, the health ministry official.

"If doctors are found to be prescribing medicines which are not on the list, or which are branded, then disciplinary action will be initiated," he said.

Free medicine is just one solution to better healthcare in India, where just getting to a state clinic can require a long journey.

Swapnil Yadav, who runs a clinic in Ambegaon, a village 170 km (105 miles) southeast of Mumbai, said India should set up free drug retailers instead of government clinics.

"Patients can approach a private clinic and then get free medicines from government-run medicine shops," he said.

The free generics scheme, which mirrors policies in the states of Tamil Nadu and Rajasthan, is expected to be fully operational by the time voters go to the polls for the 2014 general election, when the populist Congress party will seek a third straight victory.

Indian makers of generics such as Dr Reddy's and Cipla are best placed to benefit.

"The move will please the generics manufacturers who stand to gain substantially in competing for contracts," said KPMG's Stirling.

India to give free medicine to hundreds of millions

many economists of India advocate "food security"/ "free medicines"/ "right to get a job" etc in India which is not possible until the Indian government may control its population. they simply can't feed 1.2bil population from the limited natural resources they have :disagree:. USA is 3 times bigger in area than India but population of India is 4 times to USA? and on the top of that, Indian government wants to give welfare/ heavy subsidies to its people? if India face a sudden fall like ASEAN in late 90s and South America like in 80s, all these they will have to withdraw after that so better they keep habit to live in less and get rid off the unnecessary subsidies/welfares :wave:. about 5 months before, Pakistan increased petrol and diesel prices by around 10 rupees each when oil price was high as they can't afford to give subsidies while the people of Pakistan are poorer than India but Indian government is hesitating to do so? but the day they will reach level of Pakistan, just one good economic fall is required, and then India will learn all by themselves. :agree:.

only those countries may may feed their people for nothing/ give subsidies and welfare who may control their population which isnt true in case of India. until Indian government can't reduce its population, it can't feed its people for nothing and have welfare/ subsidies :pop:
 
^^ How could government control population ??
We already have a good education in family planning , it is just the job of the people to learn something from it

There is still a stigma of buying condoms from the shops ..
Government should do something in this field

Municipality in my city introduced free Condom machines but they were never maintained or refilled after the stock was over :(
 
^^ How could government control population ??
We already have a good education in family planning , it is just the job of the people to learn something from it

There is still a stigma of buying condoms from the shops ..
Government should do something in this field

Municipality in my city introduced free Condom machines but they were never maintained or refilled after the stock was over :(

Introduce them in supermarkets/malls. Then there is no need to talk anything to the shop keeper about it.
 
Introduce them in supermarkets/malls. Then there is no need to talk anything to the shop keeper about it.

They are already available :P

I am talking about the rural population
Free Condom Vending machines was a good initiative for rural areas
 
They are already available :P

I am talking about the rural population
Free Condom Vending machines was a good initiative for rural areas

Not in my place.. except for one time when I visited a Reliance Fresh outlet.Not that it matters as Kerala has a low birth rate. So people knows how to get it.

Another initiative should be it to supply condoms at the time when the couple comes to Corporation/ Panchayat office to register the marriage and give out leaflets explaining how to practice safe sex and family planning.
 
^^ How could government control population ??
We already have a good education in family planning , it is just the job of the people to learn something from it

There is still a stigma of buying condoms from the shops ..
Government should do something in this field

Municipality in my city introduced free Condom machines but they were never maintained or refilled after the stock was over :(

we already have a thread running as below. keep posting on this thread also, I will get little support :enjoy:

http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-...essons-south-asian-nations-5.html#post3156334
 
Back
Top Bottom