IND151
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2010
- Messages
- 10,170
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
Can we assume increase in number means may delay in induction of FGFA...
Maybe
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can we assume increase in number means may delay in induction of FGFA...
Lol, come on!PLAAF still have MIG 15 & MIG 19
In modern age, building 28 aircrafts a years is simply NOT possible.
We are weaker than both. So, how India going to achieve 20 LCA/year?You should check the difference in defence budget between US and France. Also the difference in industrial muscle.
When you unable to retire your older than MIG 21 aircrafts from PLAAF inventory how can you expect IAF to do that.Lol, come on!
i think you mean F7.When you unable to retire your older than MIG 21 aircrafts from PLAAF inventory how can you expect IAF to do that.
Modi is bringing ancient Indian diplomacy to a new level. Indians have always tried to connect with people than 'contact'.
I'm liking it
But Dassault with 100 years of experience & advance production technique cannot produce 28 a year
LM would produce more than 300 F-35 per year
HAL with many manual method produce 15 MKI per year
An additional 18 are being procured in a flyway condition from France 144-126=18.144 from previous 126...... sir, why is this increase???? and what about future procurements of FGFA??
Perhaps but the DM also said he was pushing for the FGFA to be fast tracked, the Rafale will just about cover the immediate needs of the IAF until around 2025 and is not really a substitute for the FGFA but will buy some breathing room for them and stem the declining Sqn strength.Can we assume increase in number means may delay in induction of FGFA...
Good until you not banned.The only cure for deluded people like you is patience. Wait and see how long it takes.
Stupidity have no limits