What a load of Cr ap.. Between 1 Mar 2000 and 30 Apr 2000, KSE closed over 2000 in 9 sessions..
^KSE: Historical Prices for - Yahoo! Finance
Anyway, I used the High of Mar 2000 and High of Mar 2010 (on the given date) for calculations..Your logic that I was misleading and cherry picking (as you normally do) would have held water had I not done the same for ^BSE. However, for BSE, unlike KSE, the high of March 2000 came back only in Dec 2003
May be you havent heard the concept of trailing returns, but that is also normally used...
KSE HIgh in Mar 2000 - 2073
KSE High in Mar 2010 - 10224
10 year CAGR - 17.3%
Currency movement - 1/52 to 1/84.5
In USD
KSE HIgh in Mar 2000 - 39.86
KSE High in Mar 2010 - 120.99
10 year CAGR - 11.74%
Even if I take the the dates that you provided (incidently the year close in India is March 31 and not Dec 31) still the currency adjusted variation between the 2 indices is 15% and 12.5%. And my previous arguement stands that the extra reward in KSE does not justify the excessive risk that set of stocks offer due to the small size of the capital markets and the turmoil in the country. This is specially visible if you take 2 year, 3 year and 5 year currency adjusted trailing returns (CAGR) for the 2 indices..
KSE :
2 yr: -30%
3 Yr: -14%
5 Yr: -7%
BSE
2 yr: -6%
3 Yr: +8%
5 Yr: +19%
This is what I meant by risk reward ratio...
I think you are deliberately and selectively picking dates and peaks to make your point.
For example, you have picked the highest peaks of the period in March 2000 to make your point, while ignoring the overall trend for the 5 year and ten year period that was up. Simply connecting the peaks is never done in calculating performance...it's highly misleading.
The bottom line remains that KSE-100 has been very competitive and performed exceptionally well for a decade, in spite of many misleading detractors like you.
And it did so again last year, rising 55% in dollar term.