Nilgiri
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2015
- Messages
- 24,797
- Reaction score
- 81
- Country
- Location
That all assumes India can gain and maintain a high GDP growth rate, which I don't believe it can. It will not get double digits, in fact I believe that it probably won't achieve 9% growth that many keep saying it will, and there is little reason to believe otherwise.
Just words without any sort of backing.
India's economy is 2-ish trillion dollars, not 5-6 trillion.
You're also presenting the best case scenario, and economies don't work like that. I calling it right now, India won't be able to maintain a stable high growth rate, it simply can't, even with reforms.
What I'm saying is it doesnt need double digit real growth rate (thats what is reported these days as the "growth rate") to get an annualized total growth rate of 16% (in nominal US dollars) if its inflation control is improved even more and less depreciation happens w.r.t USD and preferably reverses. This can happen even with less than 9% real growth annually.
Like say 8% real growth + 4% inflation + 4% appreciation.
It's really PPP that matters more to me in the end anyway since that actually represents an estimate of actual end "physical" consumption per person. Both price level w.r.t the USD and inflation are taken into account in PPP automatically (in theory) so its a superior estimate compared to nominal for per capita purposes.