What's new

India to be fastest-growing economy globally in both 2022 and 2023: IMF

Why not?

Our issue is only with North Indians imposing their Hindi on us.

We do not have any issues with Urdu speaking people.
You should let them decide if they want to eat Sambar rice. I know that you are happy to live with them already :enjoy:
 
. . .
They are hooligans, stone pelters. They deserve what they got both in Delhi and MP. If you want to end these Dangas then bring Yogi Ji's Ram Rajya to every state. I didn't read your long post.

Any rational person would consider your Yogi ji a bigot, a criminal and a Manuwadi despite his pretensions to do welfare for the females and despite some foolish, un-self-respecting females supporting him :
He believes women need male protection from birth to death and their ‘energy/power’ should be regulated or controlled, lest it become worthless and destructive.
He adds the shastras say that a woman is protected in her childhood by her father, by her husband in her youth and by her son in her old age — so that way a woman is not capable of being left free or independent.

If you want India to truly progress and not remain in the backwardness of 1000 BC then support the progressives, especially the Communists. And you have to read the long posts of the Communists to understand what is wrong and what right.
 
.
Any rational person would consider your Yogi ji as a bigot and a criminal and a Manuwadi despite his pretensions to do welfare for the females and despite some foolish, un-self-respecting females supporting him :



If you want India to truly progress and not remain in the backwardness of 1000 BC then support the progressives, especially the Communists. And you have to read the long posts of the Communists to understand what is wrong and what right.
The world knows who are backwards and living in 7th century. Communists live in a parallel lala land, self gloating aliens.
 
. .
You North Indians cannot appreciate the power of Sambaar.

I am very much a fan of South Indian film industry. I have stopped watching Bollywood movies a decade ago. I even watch those movies in original language with subtitles. It's you who have a problem with Northern India, I have no problem with Southern Indian people or their heritage or traditions or foods or movies or anything else.
 
.
The world knows who are backwards and living in 7th century.

The "world" including you should rediscover where it got some of its progressive ideas in socio-economics especially. That same 7th century ideology written in the Quran describes how to achieve a spiritually, politically and socio-economicaly progressive and harmonious society to an extent possible 1400 years ago. For example I quote from my thread from 2015 whose OP is by an Indian Christian woman who when she married an Indian Muslim she married under Islamic marriage law ( from the Quran ) because that better secured her socio-economic future in case of divorce ( yes, the Quran gives the right of divorce to the female too and before that having the very concept of divorce ) :
One wonders why a reference to the Islamic law was not made either by the minister or other experts. Married Muslim women, we find, are often on a higher and more secure footing than their counterparts from other religions. In fact, as a Christian marrying a Muslim, I chose to marry under the Muslim personal law, even over the seemingly modern Special Marriage Act, 1954, to better secure my economic rights. My mehr was a house in my name and my nikahnama includes necessary clauses to safeguard my and my children’s rights. My husband’s family members were witness to this document, which is registered and enforceable by law.

When we examine marriage laws in their historic context, it is interesting to note that the universally accepted notion that marriages are contractual rather than sacramental originates in Muslim law, which was accepted by the French law only in the 1800s and incorporated into the English law in the 1850s and became part of codified Hindu law as late as 1955. Today it appears to be the most practical way of dealing with the institution of marriage. Treating marriage as a sacrament which binds the parties for life has resulted in some of the most discriminatory practices against women such as sati and denial of right to divorce and remarriage, even in the most adverse conditions.

The cornerstone of a Muslim marriage is consent, ejab-o-qubul (proposal and acceptance) and requires the bride to accept the marriage proposal on her own free will. This freedom to consent (or refuse), which was given to Muslim women 1,400 years ago, is still not available under Hindu law since sacramental rituals such as saptapadi and kanya dan (seven steps round the nuptial fire and gifting of the bride to the groom) still form essential ceremonies of a Hindu marriage. Even after the codification of Hindu law, the notion of consent is not built into the marriage ceremonies.

The contract of marriage (nikahnama) allows for negotiated terms and conditions, it can also include the right to a delegated divorce (talaq-e-tafweez) where the woman is delegated the right to divorce her husband if any of the negotiated terms and conditions are violated.

Mehr is another unique concept of Muslim law meant to safeguard the financial future of the wife. It is an obligation, not a choice, and can be in the form of cash, valuables or securities. While there is no ceiling, a minimum amount to provide her security after marriage must be stipulated. This is a more beneficial concept than streedhan which is given by choice and usually by the natal family. In addition to Mehr, at the time of divorce, a Muslim woman has the right to fair and reasonable settlement, and this is statutorily recognised under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 as per the 2001 ruling of the Supreme Court in the Daniel Latifi case.

It is also important to address polygamy and triple talaq, two aspects of Muslim law which are generally used to discredit the community and argue in favour of a uniform civil code. While sharia law permits a man to have four wives (before 1956 Hindu law permitted unrestrained polygamy), it mandates equal treatment of all wives. If a man is not able to meet these conditions, he is not permitted to marry more than one woman. (Quran 4:3; Yusuf Ali’s translation)

On the other hand, though codification introduced monogamy for Hindus, the ground reality has not changed and Hindu men continue to be bigamous or polygamous. The most disturbing aspect is that while men in bigamous/adulterous relationships are allowed to go scot-free, it is the women who are made to pay the price. Women in invalid relationships with Hindu men are denied maintenance and protection and are referred to as “mistresses” and “concubines”, concepts specific to the uncodified Hindu law. Any attempt to codify Muslim law to bring in legal monogamy should not end up subjecting Muslim women to a plight similar to that of a Hindu second wife. This is an important concern which needs to be taken into account while reforming the Muslim law.

And lastly, the much maligned triple talaq or talaq-ul-biddat, which the Prophet himself considered as the most inappropriate form of divorce. Fortunately, in 2002, in Shamim Ara vs State of Uttar Pradesh & others, the Supreme Court laid down strict Quranic injunctions which must be followed at the time of pronouncing talaq, hence now fraudulent practices adopted by errant husbands (including email and SMS talaq) can no longer constitute valid talaq. Yet, after a decade and a half, very few know challenge the validity of such divorces in court as they are unaware about this ruling.

Though Muslim law stipulates many different ways to end a marriage, including a woman’s right to dissolve her marriage (khula), divorce by mutual consent (mubarra), delegated divorce (talaq-e-tafweez), judicial divorce (fasq) and dissolution under Muslim Marriage Act

The computer and the internet you use comes from the European Industrial Revolution which itself derives from the Islamic Golden Age which not only learned from the knowledge of the Greeks but also created ideas in various fields. Learn about the engineer and inventor Ismail al Jazari who is called the Father of Robotics and his automata being the precursors to your computer. Acknowledge and be grateful.

Communists live in a parallel lala land, self gloating aliens.

Then immediately stop using all Communist-USSR-created weaponry. And stop gloating over Rakesh Sharma's trip to space because after all he traveled on a Communist USSR spaceship and stayed aboard a Communist USSR space station.
 
Last edited:
.
The "world" including you should rediscover where it got some of its progressive ideas in socio-economics especially. That same 7th century ideology written in the Quran describes how to achieve a spiritually, politically and socio-economicaly progressive and harmonious society to an extent possible 1400 years ago. For example I quote from my thread from 2015 whose OP is by an Indian Christian woman who when she married an Indian Muslim she married under Islamic marriage law ( from the Quran ) because that better secured her socio-economic future in case of divorce ( yes, the Quran gives the right of divorce to the female too and before that having the very concept of divorce ) :


The computer and the internet you use comes from the European Industrial Revolution which itself derives from the Islamic Golden Age which not only learned from the knowledge of the Greeks but also created ideas in various fields. Learn about the engineer and inventor Ismail al Jazari who is called the Father of Robotics and his automata being the precursors to your computer. Acknowledge and be grateful.



Then immediately stop using all Communist-USSR-created weaponry.
Hinduism created the word 'Nastik', means staying within Hinduism while also not believing in any god which you commies follow. We have seen the hues and cries from Mulla brigades when Triple talak bill was passed in parliament.
 
.
Many indians should stop being bhakts of Dear Leader Modi and realize that not only has he not remedied the historic political, socio-economic and technological problems in India he has also added to them. We have a prime minister who does not go a few kilometers from his official residence in Delhi to meet protesting farmers and does not have a single word regret when 700 of those protesting farmers died of various causes by the time the unified protest was called off. But the primary cause of those 700 deaths was that the Modi administration refused to listen to the demands of the farmers. In the 2008 Bombay attack 166 Indians died and the one attacker taken alive was punished by Indian courts. Now who should be punished for the deaths of the 700 Indian farmers in the Delhi protests many more times the number of Bombay death toll ?

Dear Leader blatantly showed his shamelessness again when he visited places in Uttar Pradesh to speak in support of that criminal Yogi's election candidature but Dear Leader did not visit Lakhimpur Kheri in the same UP state. Lakhimpur Kheri is where the son of one of his government's deputy home ministers crushed to death and to injury some farmers and a journalist. Are those dead and injured people of Lakhimpur not Indians, more importantly not humans ? Is Dear Leader the prime minister of all Indians or just of all Hindutvadis ? Where went his much vaunted slogan "Sabka saath, sabka vishwaas, sabka vikaas" ( To the support of all, with the support of all, for the development of all ) ? Just another jumla lie like many others of his ?

And he is busily getting a new PM palace for himself that costs millions of dollars and constructing religion-linked statues and structures while Indians are dying or suiciding because of socio-economic reasons :

Is this the saath, vishwaas and vikaas he promised ?

You write about the popularity of "FinTech" in India. I agree that until the point that money disappears from human society money exchange should be digital but the base socio-economic system should be a progressive one. "FinTech" is a useless thing unless India gets rid of its 3000-year-old extremely Capitalist socio-economic system. There is no rational reason for such a socio-economic system to continue. And related to this is this new fashion of crypto-shipto.

You speak of real estate development in India. Well, putting up ugly highrises and 50-storey skyscrapers is not development but anti-development and anti-harmony.
Do not at like a broken tape,
In both the post (mins & Sudarshan) was there a mention of any political party ?
I mentioned 3 events and 2 of them happened when the opposition was ruling
You are spitting your random biases & negativity without understanding the context, What ever you mentioned has nothing to do with the points made in the two post you quoted

You can either waste time crying about the problem or be a part of solution, i prefer the latter one,


- India currently has a strong digital payment infra (among the best) & penetration, I am proud of the UPI (next expected such initiative from Sarkari people)

- On real estate i was not talking about the beaut but the purchasing power, today in Bangalore you will not find flats less then 6k/ square-feet from tier1 builders, even at that price it is selling like hot cakes. why because there is demand, why because purchasing power in going up, why because income levels have jumped
 
.
Well summarised, transformation in Indian cities is very well visible, what’s necessary is innovative ways to increase rural employment and improve rural economy.
Agreed,
Ball has started rolling, the rise of reselling commerce (on whatsapp) has enabled housewives of tier 2/3 cities to create new income stream, similarly a lot of action is visible on agri tech/ farming space (if personally know ppl who have left bright professional careers & setting up organic farming in villages/ working on supply chain) , this segment is still early, I think impact will be apparent with in next 5-7 year
 
.
If you want India to truly progress and not remain in the backwardness of 1000 BC then support the progressives, especially the Communists. And you have to read the long posts of the Communists to understand what is wrong and what right.
Why would someone believe you, there is no communist success story,
Current China (Beijing, Shanghai) is product of capitalism,
Different between Poorly fed, weak & small, low life expectancy, resource crunched China & Current China is capitalism
Difference between North & South Korea is capitalism

As a nation we started opening up form 2000s and we have not done a good job till date

You can argue that US supported country X, timing was right with country Y, Demography favoured country Z, but there are 1000s of success stories and not for what you are vouching for

Why not?

Our issue is only with North Indians imposing their Hindi on us.

We do not have any issues with Urdu speaking people.
What is the difference between hindi & urdu
 
.
Do not at like a broken tape,
In both the post (mins & Sudarshan) was there a mention of any political party ?
I mentioned 3 events and 2 of them happened when the opposition was ruling
You are spitting your random biases & negativity without understanding the context, What ever you mentioned has nothing to do with the points made in the two post you quoted

You can either waste time crying about the problem or be a part of solution, i prefer the latter one,


- India currently has a strong digital payment infra (among the best) & penetration, I am proud of the UPI (next expected such initiative from Sarkari people)

- On real estate i was not talking about the beaut but the purchasing power, today in Bangalore you will not find flats less then 6k/ square-feet from tier1 builders, even at that price it is selling like hot cakes. why because there is demand, why because purchasing power in going up, why because income levels have jumped
Totally agree. You can't, not anymore, stop innovations and aspirations of Indian people with Khota Biryani and Daru protest. States have started implementing Farm Laws from backdoors already.
 
. .
Not only for 2 years but India will remain fastest growing economy for 2 to 3 decades. India will grow between 8 to 12 for 2 decades and market value growth to remain betwedn 13 to 17 pc.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom