which one?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ours does.
which one?
The third layer is planned to tackle low-flying cruise missiles, artillery projectiles and rockets in the line with the overall aim to achieve "near 100% kill or interception probability".
I dont know myself man, Im asking you guys
good for you!! but do tell advantages of IR over RF onboard seeker.
Will this technology allow India to eventually make interceptors for it's ships?(destroyers, etc)
Would be nice to have miniaturized versions of the series on Indian ships.
Waiting for AD-1 and 2.
Both have their pros/cons. IIR is passive so cannot be jammed, but counter measures like flares can be employed. active Radar homing can be jammed.
check the DRDO website in their products list.
never had heard that DRDO had developed MFCR.
Cool.. entirely new info
Phase I -2014
Phase II - 2016
Phase III - before 2020
we can make air-defense destroyers with phase I & II + barak 8 ER (for regular cruise missile defense.) It will be a killer combo
Good for India. I do have a question here. If the internal ballistic interceptor program is going so well, why are you guys looking to buy the IronDome from Israel? Will that make two tiers or something else??
Good for India. I do have a question here. If the internal ballistic interceptor program is going so well, why are you guys looking to buy the IronDome from Israel? Will that make two tiers or something else??