India terms OIC resolution on Kashmir ''completely unacceptable''

[Kompromat]

Exactly. Such "resoultions" don't matter a whit.


As I told another poster, you too should be a very happy person, if these resolutions make you feel great. They come for a dime a dozen. In fact, these resolutions from OIC are almost as frequent as wars between and within members of the OIC.

We will take Kashmir one way or another or burn India with it. Ghaznavid doctrine of perpetual war still exists in our minds. Hindutva elite of Bharat will realize that Muslims of Kashmir aren't so easily abandoned.

 

[Echo_419]

Brother Arab League is just 16 odd countries. All Muslim states from Brunei to Azerbaijan, from Kazakhstan to Morroco have similar views on Kashmir. Even Ayatollah Khomeini supported Kashmir cause openly in 2009.

We are not some tiny country which needs support of such nations
These resolutions are being passed since time immorial & the end result is still null

 

[Hyperion]

Trust me Yemeni Snub was an ideological coup d'etat that will have far-reaching and positive consequences for our health...... and let us not forget the Chinese corridor, coupled with our impregnable defense that will give your people and Arabs heart and stomach ache for the next millennia........ so yes, all little things matter!

For the time-being you should go and try to interrogate our Kabootar!

Your "Yemeni snub" had nothing to do with it.

 

[ayesha.a]

First of all he was a brigadier back than commanding a brigade in Jordan

I know. And after the bloody massacre, he was rewarded with a promotion by your army - instead of being courtmartialled, as many saner voices in your country asked for.

And ordered to fight PLO insurgents (By Jordanians)

Except that a foreigner on a training mission does not have to heed "orders" to attack anybody on behalf of that country. Yes, he was their as a trainer - the same training you were earlier boasting about providing to Palestinian security forces - when he eagerly commanded a Jordanian armoured division to massacre Palestinians. He didn't have to do it, not being under their command, but he did it enthusiastically. And was rewarded with a promotion.

... As for Yasir Arafat.. Yeah is that why he wmkeot asking PAK for support over the Palestinian affair?

Helpless people would accept support from anybody. The middle east should teach you at least that much, if nothing more.

Anyway the point is that India does not have Palestinian blood on its hands, and our position has always, consistently, been statehood for Palestine. This despite all that Israel has to offer us, and despite our friendship with them - we have put principle ahead of pragmatism, at least one of the very few countries to do so vis-a-vis the middle east.

 

[topgun047]

It is a mark of India's increasing geopolitical weight and consequent confidence that earlier we used to ignore this yearly lip service as a farce, then we started condemening/rejecting it and now we are starting to dismiss it with contempt.

 

[ayesha.a]

Trust me Yemeni Snub was an ideological coup d'etat that will have far-reaching and positive consequences for our health...... and let us not forget the Chinese corridor, coupled with our impregnable defense that will give your people heart ache for the next millennia........ so yes, all little things matter!

For the time-being you should go and try to interrogate our Kabootar!

Indo-Pak issues are not the topic of the thread. So I'm not going to respond about the almighty Chinese corridor that is the panacea for all ills in Pakistan, or the "impregnable defence" of Pakistan (which doesn't need to be penetrated from outside anyway, since the widest and deepest moat do no good if your enemies are within.)

We will take Kashmir one way or another or burn India with it. Ghaznavid doctrine of perpetual war still exists in our minds. Hindutva elite of Bharat will realize that Muslims of Kashmir aren't so easily abandoned.

Right. Whatever.

 

[nik22]

We don't have an army chief or president who personally commanded a massacre of Palestinians - you do. Yasser Arafat called it a genocide. The man who commanded an armoured assault that killed 3,000 Palestinians, was promoted to Major General and later CoAS by the Pakistan army. And then of course, he overthrew the GoP itself.

Thanks for making me aware of it!!

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

And at the bottom of the thread listed under 'similar threads' we find ...

India rejects OIC remarks on Kashmir
India condemns OIC remarks on Jammu and Kashmir

So much for India's frothing at the mouth 'rejections'

 

[nik22]

Diplomacy ??? Noooooo. We call it, " TELI KA TEL ZALE, MASHALCHI KI G@ND FATE"

haha. Good One!
Also, in OIC walo ka aalam ye hai. "G@@nd me dum nahi but hum kisi se kam nahi". Apne matter to sulajh nahi rahe dusro ke suljhao pehle. Chaudhary/Padhan ban lo world ke.

 

[AHAM BRIHMASMI]

We will take Kashmir one way or another or burn India with it. Ghaznavid doctrine of perpetual war still exists in our minds. Hindutva elite of Bharat will realize that Muslims of Kashmir aren't so easily abandoned.

First try to protect the muslims of your own Pakistan. And if you have a spare bread in your home, please donate it to the Rohingyas.

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

We will take Kashmir one way or another or burn India with it. Ghaznavid doctrine of perpetual war still exists in our minds. Hindutva elite of Bharat will realize that Muslims of Kashmir aren't so easily abandoned.

1971 war shows the complete opposite of both the bolded parts

 

[The Great One]

And at the bottom of the thread listed under 'similar threads' we find ...

India rejects OIC remarks on Kashmir
India condemns OIC remarks on Jammu and Kashmir

So much for India's frothing at the mouth 'rejections'

Well, as you already know, no third party intervention is allowed per Shimla Agreement, so OIC resolutions are irrelevant.




*runs and hides*

 

[ayesha.a]

And at the bottom of the thread listed under 'similar threads' we find ...

India rejects OIC remarks on Kashmir
India condemns OIC remarks on Jammu and Kashmir

So much for India's frothing at the mouth 'rejections'

Actually, it's "so much for their remarks, which get contemptously rejected every year." That's the point.

Every year they casually make this "remark", which India dismisses equally casually, and then it's business as usual - barrels of oil to be explored, mined, sold, refined in India, resold to them, etc. This has been going on for decades. I posted a link from 2000, with the exact same title.

It's funny that you take it to mean that India's "rejection" is futile, when the reality is that it's their resolutions that are futile and inconsequential.

 

[Ajai Ghale]

Is Somalia still the member of OIC I am aware that Maldives and Syria is its Member.

 

[ayesha.a]

First try to protect the muslims of your own Pakistan. And if you have a spare bread in your home, please donate it to the Rohingyas.

He is right, his country is following a doctrine of "perpetual war." Against itself.