What's new

India successfully tests Nirbhay cruise missile

So now Indian stark is playing the game of negative rating a post that was already negative rated by another Indian... Well, there are more Indians with rating permission. You know where to do it...
Instead of blabbering will you reply to post no. #693?
P.s - Still they're not biased like you,Stop looking every thing through your green glass and act balance !!!
 
.
We are not saying USA teansferred it but Nirbhay is complete copy off Tomahawk just like our BABUR


USA didn't transfer it, neither did a Tomahawk land in our territory intact! How else do you think we copied it? Telepathy?
 
.
That was the old Tomahawk, the newer versions have the same thing.
Tomahawk+missile-03.jpg

a-tactical-tomahawk-block-iv-cruise-stocktrek-images.jpg
I know that sir. Block 4 has submerged air intake. But here that guy was saying that Nirbhay is a copy of Tomhawk and Babur( Babur was copy of Tomhawk block1/2) so definitely Nirbhay is very different than first 3 blocks of Tomhawk.
Though yes newer block 4 and Nirbhay has similarities but no way they are copied. Neither we had Tomhawk block4( or any block) NPR USA gave us any ToT or such.
 
.
I know that sir. Block 4 has submerged air intake. But here that guy was saying that Nirbhay is a copy of Tomhawk and Babur( Babur was copy of Tomhawk block1/2) so definitely Nirbhay is very different than first 3 blocks of Tomhawk.
Though yes newer block 4 and Nirbhay has similarities but no way they are copied. Neither we had Tomhawk block4( or any block) NPR USA gave us any ToT or such.

Nah its not a copy, even the Russian cruise missiles look similar to the Tomahawks but its no copy.

Look at China's.
C-602YJ-62+long+range+Anti+Ship+Cruise+Missile+(ASCM)+People%27s+Liberation+Army+Navy+(PLAN+or+PLA+Navy)+Export+Pakistan+Navy+Costal+Defence+(1).jpg
 
.
USA didn't transfer it, neither did a Tomahawk land in our territory intact! How else do you think we copied it? Telepathy?
yeah probably!

Instead of blabbering will you reply to post no. #693?
P.s - Still they're not biased like you,Stop looking every thing through your green glass and act balance !!!

Sardar ji, lgnore him... he is a think tank from kindergarten!!
 
. .
Does India have plans for stealth version that can be launch from smaller aircraft? Something like this?
JASSM-ER.jpg
 
.
Tata 12x12


Tata Motors Ltd has developed an indigenous high mobility, all-terrain and all-wheel
drive, Tata LPTA 5252-12 X12 vehicle, specifically for missile launcher cum carrier
applications like integration of Prahar, BrahMos and Nirbhay Missiles, in close
coordination with R&DE – DRDO.

The vehicle is equipped with a state of the art Electronic Controlled heavy duty engine
and automatic transmission, has high mobility features like Anti-Locking Braking System
(ABS), Central Tyre Inflation System (CTIS), Auxiliary Gear box with High and low speed
mode and differential locks system. The vehicle is operable normally in 12x8 mode and
can be driven in 12x10 and 12x12 modes as per terrain requirements
 
. .
.
That was the old Tomahawk, the newer versions have the same thing.

All the cruise missiles have to have an inlet and all of them have to obey same aerodynamic principles. That doesn't leave much for creativity and hence all the cruise missiles look more or less similar.

It is a different matter that an 'elite' idiot here refuses to believe out of his own bigoted view that India couldn't have possibly developed a cruise missile!
 
. .
morning they said 14 waypoints bt 17???

6 years for airforce version????? damn too much!!!

17 might include the target. The first production batch is going to arm the 15B Destroyer of IN which is expected to be out by 2018.
The same canisters can be used to land based forces i.e. IA.

IAF version will require the same amount of development that took place for making Brahmos airworthy. 6 years is a resonable time frame.
 
.
17 might include the target. The first production batch is going to arm the 15B Destroyer of IN which is expected to be out by 2018.
The same canisters can be used to land based forces i.e. IA.

IAF version will require the same amount of development that took place for making Brahmos airworthy. 6 years is a resonable time frame.
there was no target interception in this test!! shivalik and Kolkata and all other newly inducted war ships can also carry nirbhay with little modifications (I think)
yeah reasonable time...may be!!
 
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom