What's new

India spent Rs 420,000 to deport one Bangladeshi from Assam

Now you started giving us lesson how bengalis are... You needed to invent something else. And Muslim Bengali does not mean they are Bangladeshi.

How can you accuse me of fabricating this stuff when I told you that it was just my POV. As far as the maid being from Bangladesh is concerned then there aint no doubt about it. However I wonder why are you not able to digest this fact. See Indian labourers also go to Dubai and middle east and what not to earn quick buck and I think its fine. Its economics at work. Simillarly in case of my maid the mere economics of the equation justify what she is doing.

Now before I reply to any further questions or accusations I would like you to refute my claim with proper logic or else I wont waste my time replying.
 
.
How canaccuse me that I am fabricating this stuff when I told you that it was just my POV. As far as the maid being from Bangladesh is concerned then there aint no doubt about it. However I wonder why are you not able to digest this fact. See Indian labourers also go to Dubai and middle east and what not to earn quick buck and I think its fine. Its economics at work. Simillarly in case of my maid the mere economics of the equation justify what she is doing.

Now before I reply to any further questions or accusations I would like you to refute my claim with proper logic or else I wont waste my time replying.

The only thing left for you to arrange a video conferencing with your maid. So that we could ask her, what made her to cross the border to go to a hostile land for the miser living she could earn. Otherwise I could come up with 1000s of Indian maids delivering since morning till evening in my home too...:devil:
 
.
The only thing left for you to arrange a video conferencing with your maid. So that we could ask her, what made her to cross the border to go to a hostile land for the miser living she could earn. Otherwise I could come up with 1000s of Indian maids delivering since morning till evening in my home too...:devil:

Or the better option will be for you to visit here and see for yourself ( video confrencing can be staged right, on second thoughts so can be your visit , but well will be much more difficult than the former.)

Move on man.. you dont want to appraise yourself of the truth. I am wasting my time here.
 
Last edited:
.
Hey listen, watch your ****** mouth. Look at your current position and then bark. You guys are good century behind us. I hate talking like this, but after you spew your BS, what do you expect.

Good century back huh

Abbay, 60 % your population live under dollar a day and countless die due to lack of food including farmar commiting suicide. No one in bd neither die because of lack food nor any of our farmer commit suicide. So shut your skinny mouth and stop labeling your homeless citizen as ours. No bangladeshi muslims would work in hindus house as a maid.

It's your country that urges its citizen to eat R#T to reduce hungers so think before opening your big mouth.
 
.
Ok buddy, good for you. Looks like living in denial is working fine for you guys. Have a happy life in your make believe Richie rich world.
I give up!!
You don't need money to buy dreams. Thats why you guys are happy in your dream land, cause thats all you can afford.The world knows what your economy is like, and what conditions you are living in
Dream on boys!! Its free!!
 
. .
Yes keeping in view the situation in Afghanistan for the last 30 or so years, They call Pakistan as Dubai, europe for them.


Now come back to the topic.

Jana ,
Search for todays rates for 1 indian rupee
XE - Universal Currency Converter

1.00 INR(India Rupees) =1.85513 PKR (Pakistan Rupees)

and
1.00 INR(India Rupees)= 1.52356 BDT (Bangladesh Taka)

Now you Judge your self about India , Dubai and Europe
 
.
^^^^
There is nothing to be change or accept unless it proven rahter than make believe claim by some ignorant bharati. You people have to look at the fact on ground and compare social living condition between bharat and bd. We are all most same in all sectors however I do reconized that bharat is ahead of us in technology and it does have few strong capitalist like tata but it's absurd and moranic claim that flux of bangladeshi are in bharat looking for maid jobs.

Todays Bangladesh is not the same 70's bd as some of you uninformed ignorant food try to paint here. There is a limit to bull shiting and some bharati clearly surpus in ignorance and arrogant.
 
.
Jana ,
Search for todays rates for 1 indian rupee
XE - Universal Currency Converter

1.00 INR(India Rupees) =1.85513 PKR (Pakistan Rupees)

and
1.00 INR(India Rupees)= 1.52356 BDT (Bangladesh Taka)

Now you Judge your self about India , Dubai and Europe

And whts the conversion rate btn Japnese Yen and Indian Rupee as well as Srilankan currency?
 
.
We have been through this before. But once again.



From 1951 to 2001 the Hindu population has actually decreased (from 66.65% to 64.89%), even after the upward spike in 1971 due to massive Hindu immigration during that time, for reasons we all know. During the same period, 1951 – 2001, Muslims have steadily grown (from 22.60% to 30.92%) and even the Hindu immigration in 1971 hasn’t been able to offset this growth. During 1971 – 1991, the Muslims have grown at a breakneck speed of 77.42% while during the same period the Hindus have grown at a modest rate of 41.89%. Curiously enough, during that period there is a spike in total population and although statistically the Hindus have grown, their size has actually shrunk, while the size of Muslim population has grown. Which means that the spike in total population is driven almost entirely by this Muslim growth.

During 1971, the immigration from Bangladesh to India had a distinct pattern. Initially both the Muslims and Hindus immigrated almost in equal numbers. But later on and for the most part of the year, about 80% of the immigration consisted of Hindus. Towards the end it was almost 100% Hindus. Logic dictates that at the end of the census period (1971 – 1991), the Hindu growth rate should be higher than the Muslim growth rate. But it is just the opposite. During 1951 – 1971 Muslim average growth rate was 34.67%. But during 1971 – 1991, this growth rate more than doubles to 77.42%. During the same period, which includes that massive immigration of 1971, Hindu average growth rate has only marginally increased, negligible compared to Muslim growth rate.

What conclusion can be drawn from this? That the Hindu immigration has been a one time event and stopped once conflict of 1971 was resolved. While on the other hand, the Muslim immigration has been a continuous affair through out the period from 1971 – 1991, which is why the one time immigration of Hindus is completely nullified. Either that, or Muslims in Assam procreated at a phenomenal rate during that specific period of 1971 – 1991.

District wise analysis makes this illegal immigration of Bangladeshis even more apparent.
 
.
We have been through this before. But once again.



From 1951 to 2001 the Hindu population has actually decreased (from 66.65% to 64.89%), even after the upward spike in 1971 due to massive Hindu immigration during that time, for reasons we all know. During the same period, 1951 – 2001, Muslims have steadily grown (from 22.60% to 30.92%) and even the Hindu immigration in 1971 hasn’t been able to offset this growth. During 1971 – 1991, the Muslims have grown at a breakneck speed of 77.42% while during the same period the Hindus have grown at a modest rate of 41.89%. Curiously enough, during that period there is a spike in total population and although statistically the Hindus have grown, their size has actually shrunk, while the size of Muslim population has grown. Which means that the spike in total population is driven almost entirely by this Muslim growth.

During 1971, the immigration from Bangladesh to India had a distinct pattern. Initially both the Muslims and Hindus immigrated almost in equal numbers. But later on and for the most part of the year, about 80% of the immigration consisted of Hindus. Towards the end it was almost 100% Hindus. Logic dictates that at the end of the census period (1971 – 1991), the Hindu growth rate should be higher than the Muslim growth rate. But it is just the opposite. During 1951 – 1971 Muslim average growth rate was 34.67%. But during 1971 – 1991, this growth rate more than doubles to 77.42%. During the same period, which includes that massive immigration of 1971, Hindu average growth rate has only marginally increased, negligible compared to Muslim growth rate.

What conclusion can be drawn from this? That the Hindu immigration has been a one time event and stopped once conflict of 1971 was resolved. While on the other hand, the Muslim immigration has been a continuous affair through out the period from 1971 – 1991, which is why the one time immigration of Hindus is completely nullified. Either that, or Muslims in Assam procreated at a phenomenal rate during that specific period of 1971 – 1991.

District wise analysis makes this illegal immigration of Bangladeshis even more apparent.

Thank you for breathing life in the derailed thread.(in which i am partially resposible too) Good job!
 
.
Jana ,
Search for todays rates for 1 indian rupee
XE - Universal Currency Converter

1.00 INR(India Rupees) =1.85513 PKR (Pakistan Rupees)

and
1.00 INR(India Rupees)= 1.52356 BDT (Bangladesh Taka)

Now you Judge your self about India , Dubai and Europe


BTW on the same site you convert PKR to YEN and you'll find us better than Japanese. what does that mean we are better in every way from Japanese.
 
.
^^^^
There is nothing to be change or accept unless it proven rahter than make believe claim by some ignorant bharati. You people have to look at the fact on ground and compare social living condition between bharat and bd. We are all most same in all sectors however I do reconized that bharat is ahead of us in technology and it does have few strong capitalist like tata but it's absurd and moranic claim that flux of bangladeshi are in bharat looking for maid jobs.

Todays Bangladesh is not the same 70's bd as some of you uninformed ignorant food try to paint here. There is a limit to bull shiting and some bharati clearly surpus in ignorance and arrogant.

No one was being arrogant to start with. Please turn back read the posts and then decide who started the ranting. Anyways, the thread is back ti its topic, and you are free to make your argument
 
.
Tell me can Afghani go to india without visa. Can they live their for almost 30 years and do business without any documentation. We treat them like brothers.

BTW on the same site you convert PKR to YEN and you'll find us better than Japanese. what does that mean we are better in every way from Japanese.

Its all off topic stuff bro. just ignore.
Please stick to the topic
 
.
Dude I will do the maths for you:

My maid comes in the evening for 1 hour. She washes my clothes twice/thrice a week , prepares food for a single time and cleans my 1bhk apartment. I pay her 800 bucks. Now if she does the same for lets say 5-8 houses and each pays her in tune of 800 then its easily above 5k and all this by just spending 7-8 hrs of work. In whatever time remains she can be indulged in other activities. Also these get hired for a evening in marriages and parties where they get paid in tune of 1k or above for a evening. Now you can see why being a maid in gurgaon isnt a bad option.

The rates you mentioned and working tactics you mentioned,similar in Bangladesh.Besides,some maids have side businesses thanks to micro-credit.

In posh areas,the rates can become as much as double of what you mentioned there.


As for the topic:

I will not say that there isn't a single illegal Bangladeshi in India,but they are certainly not in the number that Indians claim.

Poor people looks for jobs in a country whose condition is slightly better than their own.I agree with that.
And at the same time I should mention about the press release from Bangladesh Govt. last year,that over 5 lakh Indians entered Bangladesh legally but did not return to their country.The news was discussed many time in the past right here,so not bothering to post the link.And most importantly,there is solid proof,i.e. the passports.I did not even mention about illegal entering of Indians through the border.Because you will not believe it anyway.

Indians in Bangladesh works mainly as rickshaw pullers,barbers (a large number),runs small shops and in the garments industry.

Why does Indians come to BD?which is a less developed country?
Because BD certainly is more develoved than India's NE states.I don't see any other reason.

Poor people will move around to meet their needs,that has been the norm for years and that is natural.Though I do not support it,because it has safety issues.

Many Indians related the BDs with terrorism,well then listen to our concern now.Every year at a certain time a major unrest occurs in the garments industry of BD.
Every time investigators concludes that "Foreign hand" was behind it.With so many illegal Indian immigrants and India being our competitor in RMG,even a child can figure out where the threat lies.



Coming to BDR getting bribe issue:

Some Indian members mentioned it,and I won't disagree again.

But have you wondered,how come we are still able to get beef from India,despite all the killings?

That is because your BSF is also equally as corrupt.

All those shooting occurs when they don't get their desired "Bakhshish" from the cattle traders.
Same goes for all those "illegal immigrant" you keep barking about.Give money and keep the guns silent.Its an old game.But looks like some are totally ignorant about it.


Illegal immigrants are everywhere,but in India,some rag-tag extremist party unleashed their propaganda,and suddenly it became a concern for everyone.

And one more point:

How do you differentiate between a Bangladeshi person living near Indian border from an Indian person living near Bangladeshi border?
Given that their religion is same.either muslim or hindu.

1. Language?

2. food?

3. clothing?


From my experience of being in those bordering areas,all the answers are a big NO.
One cannot differentiate between the two,and this is a fact.

If anyone deny this,then I suggest that person to visit the bordering areas.And find out yourself.

So when BSF pushes over "so called" illegal immigrants,how is BDR supposed to know they are not Indian citizens?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom