What's new

India, Singapore Can Consider Warship-Building Venture, Says Expert

Designing does not mean they would simply design whole ship but merely polish the design.
Ban removed if we get serious offer & GOI make in India campaign.

Serious offer? Ok? In which? 76 mm gun? Which L&T already signed contracts with OTO, to manufacture home.

If we want Radars, then we go JV with israel. If we want weapon system, then we go JV with israel or Russia.

In which field you want JV? And which serious offer you talking about?

[quote="kaku1, post: 6337081, member:

GSL-Designed%2B75-metre%2BNOPV-2.jpg

75m GSL Design for anti-ship warship.

Bro, the Singapore didnt designed a single warship, and India designing that from 1990. If you still want to remain in delusion, then sorry I cant help you out.


Looks like dutch ship to me, Sigma.[/quote]

@Sigma thats GSL design, for export, like Vietnam.
 
.
As far as warship design goes, there is nothing major that Singapore can give India. However some inputs from their work practices and modular methods may be useful.

@kaku1 The Formidable class is a modified La Fayette frigate. It's designed by DCNS of France. Singapore didn't design that.
 
.
As far as warship design goes, there is nothing major that Singapore can give India. However some inputs from their work practices and modular methods may be useful.

@kaku1 The Formidable class is a modified La Fayette frigate. It's designed by DCNS of France. Singapore didn't design that.

Yup that is my whole point, The ST Engineering never design a single warships in his history, how they can help us in designing.

As far as warship design goes, there is nothing major that Singapore can give India. However some inputs from their work practices and modular methods may be useful.

@kaku1 The Formidable class is a modified La Fayette frigate. It's designed by DCNS of France. Singapore didn't design that.

And upto upgrading our shipyards in Modular design, then we should need to contact French or Brits, not Singapore.
 
.
Serious offer? Ok? In which? 76 mm gun? Which L&T already signed contracts with OTO, to manufacture home.

If we want Radars, then we go JV with israel. If we want weapon system, then we go JV with israel or Russia.

In which field you want JV? And which serious offer you talking about?

If someone propose good offer to you bar Israel, Russia then you would say I would go only with Israel or Russia ?
For Gun we need 100 mm & 130 mm also & JV would be more beneficial than licence manufacturing.
 
.
If someone propose good offer to you bar Israel, Russia then you would say I would go only with Israel or Russia ?
For Gun we need 100 mm & 130 mm also & JV would be more beneficial than licence manufacturing.

Your all warship currently using OTO 76mm gun, you want to change whole gun with new one. Why? That would be disaster.

If something need to be done, then its reverse engineering, not creating a base for whole new gun.
 
.
Your all warship currently using OTO 76mm gun, you want to change whole gun with new one. Why? That would be disaster.

If something need to be done, then its reverse engineering, not creating a base for whole new gun.

There are era of Rail Gun & you are talking about reverse engineer a Naval gun without sanction for blocking any further technology to come India?
 
.
There are era of Rail Gun & you are talking about reverse engineer a Naval gun without sanction for blocking any further technology to come India?

And you talking about the JV with Singapore on same naval gun in a era of Rail Gun? You have any love with Singapore.

BTW, you already lost your argument bro, the 76 mm gun is the least thing as cost in a warship, The GoI not going for JV just for 76 mm gun, we already dependent on OTO for that. We have spare parts, we have workforce for repairing, and our shipyard well know this system.
So, no need for new one.
 
.
And you talking about the JV with Singapore on same naval gun in a era of Rail Gun? You have any love with Singapore.

BTW, you already lost your argument bro, the 76 mm gun is the least thing as cost in a warship, The GoI not going for JV just for 76 mm gun, we already dependent on OTO for that. We have spare parts, we have workforce for repairing, and our shipyard well know this system.
So, no need for new one.
If some one offer me JV of gun then definitely I would ditch licence manufacturing in favour of that. Money & tech don't care about love affair.
 
.
If some one offer me JV of gun then definitely I would ditch licence manufacturing in favour of that. Money & tech don't care about love affair.

You know why the Scorpene class submarine delayed so much, and why the Indian shipyard and Navy showing reservation in building in India? Even after the ToT.

Read something, before commenting.
 
.
You know why the Scorpene class submarine delayed so much, and why the Indian shipyard and Navy showing reservation in building in India? Even after the ToT.

Read something, before commenting.

Management skills does not part of ToT
 
.
Management skills does not part of ToT

Lol, that was not about management skill. Read about it. And read about that also, what are the consequences in changing a weapon system with a whole new one with other manufacturing base.
 
.
Lol, that was not about management skill. Read about it. And read about that also, what are the consequences in changing a weapon system with a whole new one with other manufacturing base.

We would induct more than 100 ship but can't change weapon system due to old one ?
How can we afford Rafale or Pak FA due to availability of Su-30 MKI or Jaguar.
 
.
We would induct more than 100 ship but can't change weapon system due to old one ?
How can we afford Rafale or Pak FA due to availability of Su-30 MKI or Jaguar.

So, you saying OTO 76mm gun is old one? Amazed.

BTW, I said changing the weapon system, from other manufacturing base.
Ok, lets agree to disagree. And cut this argument.
 
.
So, you saying OTO 76mm gun is old one? Amazed.

BTW, I said changing the weapon system, from other manufacturing base.
Ok, lets agree to disagree. And cut this argument.
Not old one but if we get JV then better.
OK
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom