What's new

India shelves plan to expand French submarine order after Scorpene data breach

India’s Submarine Arm- The Road ahead

Rollout of the First Kalvari class Submarine in Mumbai.

The 24TH of August brought a nightmare of sorts for the Indian Navy as the Australian Newspaper released a set of 22000 papers with Technical & Operational details of the Scorpene class submarines currently in construction for the Indian navy at Mazagon Docks Mumbai. In Many ways the Submarine arm of the Indian Navy seems to be jinxed. In 1957, the then Defence Minister requested Lord Mountbatten, then the First Sea Lord, to provide India a target submarine which could be the oldest and cheapest available, he refused. In 1959 the Navy asked the UK for three operational submarines, this never happened as the UK refused the soft credit terms sought by India. The Navy finally got a Break when the Soviet Union came to our rescue and provided us India with eight Foxtrot class submarines between 1967 & 1974.

The jinx was not broken though and India was hit by a double Whammy in the 80’S First the HDW scam broke in 1987 which saw the much required class of six HDW type 209 submarines being acquired being reduced to four boats, then India had to prematurely return the Charlie class SSN it had leased from the USSR for 10 years after the dissolution of the Soviet Union after it had only served the IN for a bare three years. Once again the Russians came to our rescue and the fleet was bolstered by 10 877EKM (KILO) class boats which were inducted between 1986 & 2000.This was followed by the Selection of the Kalvari (Scorpene) class boats in 2005, this project is currently running 4 years behind schedule and has just been hit by the Scorpene Leak as well.

An Indian Navy Kilo Class Submarine

This brings us to P75I after years of delays the DAC finally approved a sum of 53000 crores for the Purchase of Six advanced SSK units. The Catch this time was that much like the Kalvari class all 6 would be built in India with a strategic partner to be selected after due deliberation. This has since increased to an expected cost of over 60000 crores.

However the recent leaks beg the question why do we need to risk more leaks by foreign partners? Why can’t we build our own SSK? The Indian Navy already has a Submarine design Group within the directorate of Naval Design that has just designed the Arihant class of SSBN & is currently working on a domestic class of SSN. We also possess extensive literature & Blueprints for Both the HDW Type 209 7 the Scorpene class of Submarines that we can modify into our own SSK. Now if we actually design a domestic SSK the next question is how & Where it can be Built within India , what are the technologies required, how many of those technologies re available in country etc. Without going too much into details a SSK has a few basic components, these are:
1) Hull
2) Sonars
3) AIP
4) Combat & Control Electronics
5) Battery Packs
6) Primary Diesel Engine, Generator, Gear & Drivetrain
7) Torpedoes & Missiles (weaponry)
8) Anechoic tiles & Sound Insulation
I shall be listing out Indian Firms that can be employed for sourcing the parts listed above which can be used to build an Indian SSK.


L&T's massive yard at Katupalli

Hull-The are two parts to making a Submarine Hull, the first is the Metal & the second is the Fabrication of the Metal into a Hull capable of withstanding the extreme stress a Submarine has to undergo. The Metal will most likely be DMR292A Steel or the DMR249B Submarine Grade Steel developed in 2015 by SAIL At its Rourkela & Durgapur plants, Apart from This India has also made Titanium domestically which was used by the USSR for its ALFA class of SSNs during the Cold war. The Obvious candidates for fabricating a hull out of this metal are MDL & L&T .The Mazagon docks limited has had extensive experience in fabricating and building the Hulls of the HDW boats in the 1980’s and is building the Scorpene class Boats now. Larsen & Toubro has some of India’s most modern shipbuilding facilities at Hazira in Gujarat & Katupalli in Tamil Nadu. L&T has partnered HSL, DRDO & the Indian Navy in building the Hulls for the Arihant Class SSBN and hence has built a legitimate claim towards the fabrication of any future Indian SSK.

Sonar-The Obvious candidate for this would be the same USHUS Advanced Sonar currently in production at BEL Bangalore. As of today this Sonar is already operational in Five Sindhughosh class SSKs and the INS Arihant. Apart from this India also builds the Panchendriya Sonar System that is a unified submarine sonar and tactical control system & includes all types of sonar (passive, surveillance, ranging, intercept, obstacle avoidance and active).It is used for detecting and tracking enemy submarines, surface vessels, and torpedoes and can be used for underwater communication and avoiding obstacles. We can fully expect to see both these systems form the Sensory core of any future Indian SSK.


A Mockup of the DRDO AIP Module

AIP-DRDO is currently developing at least two different types of AIP (Air independent Propulsion) Fuel Cell technologies called PAFC (Phosphoric acid fuel cell) & PEMFC (polymer electrolyte fuel cell). Both of these were supposed to be operational in time for installation into the Kalvari Class of Submarines, however Due to delays by DRDO these systems are only expected to be installed into the fifth & Sixth Kalvari class boats. As of now the Project is delayed and DRDO has yet to exhibit a working prototype.
Even if the DRDO AIP is not ready we have the option of purchasing commercially available AIP technologies from a variety of Global manufacturers if required.


Combat & Control Technologies-TATA Strategic Electronics Division partnered with DRDO to build the entire Control System for the Arihant SSBN project. Apart from this we also have the sonar ISS (Integrated Sonar Suite), state-of-the-art sonar developed for the 2nd SSBN called Aridaman by NPOL DRDO. This is a unified submarine sonar and tactical control system & includes all types of sonar (passive, surveillance, ranging, intercept, obstacle avoidance and active). It also features an underwater communications system. The hull features twin flank-array sonars and Rafael broadband expendable anti-torpedo countermeasures.



Exide Batteries Submarine Cell


Battery Pack-There are at least two Indian manufacturers that have a known capability to manufacture Batteries for Submarines .HBL Batteries headquartered at Hyderabad manufactures 12391 Wh to 40300 Wh Batteries for Submarines at its facilities in Telangana, Andhra Pradesh, Uttarakhand & Haryana. Exide Industries India also manufactures Batteries for Submarines and currently meets 100%of the requirement of Submarine batteries for the Indian Navy. Exide also has a license to export Submarine batteries and is currently closing an order for Submarine batteries to Algeria and Russia. Exide is on the list of registered Submarine battery vendors for the Russian Submarine Design Bureau RUBIN as well.



Primary Diesel Engine, Generator, Gear & Drivetrain-India has already developed an Electrical drivetrain along with the generator for the Arihant class SSBN, while the exact details of the system remain classified it is known that the entire system along with the Gearbox was supplied by Walchandnagar industries based in Maharashtra .This system can be adapted to create a drivetrain for an Indian SSK by replacing the Steam Turbine & Nuclear reactor with a Submarine Marine Diesel as the prime Mover. While there are numerous manufacturers of Marine Diesel Engines in India like Cummins India and Kirloskar Oil Engines Indian Limited, these manufacturers have never made an Engine for a Submarine. The good news is that Submarine Diesel Engines are commercially available from global manufacturers like MTU (which supplies the engine for the Arjun Tank) & Kawasaki.

Varunastra test firing
Torpedoes & Missiles (weaponry)-DRDO has developed at least two domestic Torpedo weapons systems that could find their way onto a domestic SSK. The Shenya Advanced Light Torpedo and the Varunastra Heavyweight Torpedo have both been test fired from Ships however Submarine firings have yet to be undertaken. The Submarine variants of both these torpedoes are very much still in further development even as their ship borne variants are being inducted. Apart from these products from DRDO Anil Ambani has also tied up with Atlas GMbh of Germany to manufacture & sell the Seahake range of Torpedoes to the Indian Navy. We can fully expect all of these torpedoes to make it into the Arsenal of an Indian DE submarine. The candidates for Missiles that shall arm any future Indian SSK are the Russian Klub/Kalibr & the Indian Brahmos. The Submarines launched version of the Brahmos is still in development and has been tested once from a pontoon platform in 2013. A future Indian SSK shall in all probability be armed with a 16 cell VLS launcher developed within India by L&T for Brahmos Missiles while also carrying Klub/Kalibr units to be fired via Torpedo Tubes.


Anechoic tiles & Sound Insulation- Once again Technologies that were developed in India for the Arihant class of Submarines shall come in useful as any future Indian SSK can use the same anechoic tiles developed for the INS Arihant by a rubber vulcanizing firm based out of Mysore. The name of this firm remains classified.

India really needs to think whether it needs to spend 60000 crore rupees on purchasing SSK technology from a Foreign Partner when all of the components required can easily be found within Indian Shores. An internal Indian Navy assessment a few days ago found that it would Cost India only 35000 crores to develop & build six Indian SSNs. We should scrap the P75I and use the funds available to develop and manufacture an Indian SSN & an Indian SSK. The Indian Navy plans to deploy a fleet of at least 30-35 submarines by 2030 to counter the PLAN’s fleet of over 80 boats. These will be a mix of 4-6 SSBNs, 6 SSNs & 20 SSKs. The Navy will be left with only six compromised Scorpenes and 8 old KILOS in 2030 unless we start induction of more SSKs quickly. India can buy time to develop its own SSK by using 20000 crores for off the shelf purchase of some 10 improved Kilo class submarines(at 300$mil each) these will bolster numbers while we use the remaining 40000 crores to develop & build a fleet of Indian Submarines.

http://bengalraider.blogspot.in/2016/09/indias-submarine-arm-road-ahead.html

@PARIKRAMA your thoughts
 
So after all those years producing U209, Scorpene and Indigenous INS Arihant we are still not able to build our own indigenous SSK.
What technologies do we expect to have in Project 75I that we don't already possess? We were supposed to make Scorpenes under 100% tech transfer so I guess we must have all the critical manufacturing technologies as of now.
Are you sure we will be able to do the same after one more foreign procurement?

The question is not foreign procurement. The question was establishment of 2 separate submarine production line to arm our local MIC with cutting edge technology and utilise the skills and technology absorption for our local projects.

The two lines timeline was not suppose to be overlapping rather it was a simple plan comprising of one line finishing and second line under 50% progress and the finished line being used for indigenous SSK.. The refinement of the constructional philosophy in comparison to the European methodologies followed for the two different class of submarines, which includes the sequence of production, system integration, effective utilization of the trained manpower etc. That is where now we have issues bczs the second line in another port is not yet done nor tech absorption from second line has happened.

I can explain better with you next post.

India’s Submarine Arm- The Road ahead

Rollout of the First Kalvari class Submarine in Mumbai.

The 24TH of August brought a nightmare of sorts for the Indian Navy as the Australian Newspaper released a set of 22000 papers with Technical & Operational details of the Scorpene class submarines currently in construction for the Indian navy at Mazagon Docks Mumbai. In Many ways the Submarine arm of the Indian Navy seems to be jinxed. In 1957, the then Defence Minister requested Lord Mountbatten, then the First Sea Lord, to provide India a target submarine which could be the oldest and cheapest available, he refused. In 1959 the Navy asked the UK for three operational submarines, this never happened as the UK refused the soft credit terms sought by India. The Navy finally got a Break when the Soviet Union came to our rescue and provided us India with eight Foxtrot class submarines between 1967 & 1974.

The jinx was not broken though and India was hit by a double Whammy in the 80’S First the HDW scam broke in 1987 which saw the much required class of six HDW type 209 submarines being acquired being reduced to four boats, then India had to prematurely return the Charlie class SSN it had leased from the USSR for 10 years after the dissolution of the Soviet Union after it had only served the IN for a bare three years. Once again the Russians came to our rescue and the fleet was bolstered by 10 877EKM (KILO) class boats which were inducted between 1986 & 2000.This was followed by the Selection of the Kalvari (Scorpene) class boats in 2005, this project is currently running 4 years behind schedule and has just been hit by the Scorpene Leak as well.

An Indian Navy Kilo Class Submarine

This brings us to P75I after years of delays the DAC finally approved a sum of 53000 crores for the Purchase of Six advanced SSK units. The Catch this time was that much like the Kalvari class all 6 would be built in India with a strategic partner to be selected after due deliberation. This has since increased to an expected cost of over 60000 crores.

However the recent leaks beg the question why do we need to risk more leaks by foreign partners? Why can’t we build our own SSK? The Indian Navy already has a Submarine design Group within the directorate of Naval Design that has just designed the Arihant class of SSBN & is currently working on a domestic class of SSN. We also possess extensive literature & Blueprints for Both the HDW Type 209 7 the Scorpene class of Submarines that we can modify into our own SSK. Now if we actually design a domestic SSK the next question is how & Where it can be Built within India , what are the technologies required, how many of those technologies re available in country etc. Without going too much into details a SSK has a few basic components, these are:
1) Hull
2) Sonars
3) AIP
4) Combat & Control Electronics
5) Battery Packs
6) Primary Diesel Engine, Generator, Gear & Drivetrain
7) Torpedoes & Missiles (weaponry)
8) Anechoic tiles & Sound Insulation
I shall be listing out Indian Firms that can be employed for sourcing the parts listed above which can be used to build an Indian SSK.


L&T's massive yard at Katupalli

Hull-The are two parts to making a Submarine Hull, the first is the Metal & the second is the Fabrication of the Metal into a Hull capable of withstanding the extreme stress a Submarine has to undergo. The Metal will most likely be DMR292A Steel or the DMR249B Submarine Grade Steel developed in 2015 by SAIL At its Rourkela & Durgapur plants, Apart from This India has also made Titanium domestically which was used by the USSR for its ALFA class of SSNs during the Cold war. The Obvious candidates for fabricating a hull out of this metal are MDL & L&T .The Mazagon docks limited has had extensive experience in fabricating and building the Hulls of the HDW boats in the 1980’s and is building the Scorpene class Boats now. Larsen & Toubro has some of India’s most modern shipbuilding facilities at Hazira in Gujarat & Katupalli in Tamil Nadu. L&T has partnered HSL, DRDO & the Indian Navy in building the Hulls for the Arihant Class SSBN and hence has built a legitimate claim towards the fabrication of any future Indian SSK.

Sonar-The Obvious candidate for this would be the same USHUS Advanced Sonar currently in production at BEL Bangalore. As of today this Sonar is already operational in Five Sindhughosh class SSKs and the INS Arihant. Apart from this India also builds the Panchendriya Sonar System that is a unified submarine sonar and tactical control system & includes all types of sonar (passive, surveillance, ranging, intercept, obstacle avoidance and active).It is used for detecting and tracking enemy submarines, surface vessels, and torpedoes and can be used for underwater communication and avoiding obstacles. We can fully expect to see both these systems form the Sensory core of any future Indian SSK.


A Mockup of the DRDO AIP Module

AIP-DRDO is currently developing at least two different types of AIP (Air independent Propulsion) Fuel Cell technologies called PAFC (Phosphoric acid fuel cell) & PEMFC (polymer electrolyte fuel cell). Both of these were supposed to be operational in time for installation into the Kalvari Class of Submarines, however Due to delays by DRDO these systems are only expected to be installed into the fifth & Sixth Kalvari class boats. As of now the Project is delayed and DRDO has yet to exhibit a working prototype.
Even if the DRDO AIP is not ready we have the option of purchasing commercially available AIP technologies from a variety of Global manufacturers if required.


Combat & Control Technologies-TATA Strategic Electronics Division partnered with DRDO to build the entire Control System for the Arihant SSBN project. Apart from this we also have the sonar ISS (Integrated Sonar Suite), state-of-the-art sonar developed for the 2nd SSBN called Aridaman by NPOL DRDO. This is a unified submarine sonar and tactical control system & includes all types of sonar (passive, surveillance, ranging, intercept, obstacle avoidance and active). It also features an underwater communications system. The hull features twin flank-array sonars and Rafael broadband expendable anti-torpedo countermeasures.



Exide Batteries Submarine Cell


Battery Pack-There are at least two Indian manufacturers that have a known capability to manufacture Batteries for Submarines .HBL Batteries headquartered at Hyderabad manufactures 12391 Wh to 40300 Wh Batteries for Submarines at its facilities in Telangana, Andhra Pradesh, Uttarakhand & Haryana. Exide Industries India also manufactures Batteries for Submarines and currently meets 100%of the requirement of Submarine batteries for the Indian Navy. Exide also has a license to export Submarine batteries and is currently closing an order for Submarine batteries to Algeria and Russia. Exide is on the list of registered Submarine battery vendors for the Russian Submarine Design Bureau RUBIN as well.



Primary Diesel Engine, Generator, Gear & Drivetrain-India has already developed an Electrical drivetrain along with the generator for the Arihant class SSBN, while the exact details of the system remain classified it is known that the entire system along with the Gearbox was supplied by Walchandnagar industries based in Maharashtra .This system can be adapted to create a drivetrain for an Indian SSK by replacing the Steam Turbine & Nuclear reactor with a Submarine Marine Diesel as the prime Mover. While there are numerous manufacturers of Marine Diesel Engines in India like Cummins India and Kirloskar Oil Engines Indian Limited, these manufacturers have never made an Engine for a Submarine. The good news is that Submarine Diesel Engines are commercially available from global manufacturers like MTU (which supplies the engine for the Arjun Tank) & Kawasaki.

Varunastra test firing
Torpedoes & Missiles (weaponry)-DRDO has developed at least two domestic Torpedo weapons systems that could find their way onto a domestic SSK. The Shenya Advanced Light Torpedo and the Varunastra Heavyweight Torpedo have both been test fired from Ships however Submarine firings have yet to be undertaken. The Submarine variants of both these torpedoes are very much still in further development even as their ship borne variants are being inducted. Apart from these products from DRDO Anil Ambani has also tied up with Atlas GMbh of Germany to manufacture & sell the Seahake range of Torpedoes to the Indian Navy. We can fully expect all of these torpedoes to make it into the Arsenal of an Indian DE submarine. The candidates for Missiles that shall arm any future Indian SSK are the Russian Klub/Kalibr & the Indian Brahmos. The Submarines launched version of the Brahmos is still in development and has been tested once from a pontoon platform in 2013. A future Indian SSK shall in all probability be armed with a 16 cell VLS launcher developed within India by L&T for Brahmos Missiles while also carrying Klub/Kalibr units to be fired via Torpedo Tubes.


Anechoic tiles & Sound Insulation- Once again Technologies that were developed in India for the Arihant class of Submarines shall come in useful as any future Indian SSK can use the same anechoic tiles developed for the INS Arihant by a rubber vulcanizing firm based out of Mysore. The name of this firm remains classified.

India really needs to think whether it needs to spend 60000 crore rupees on purchasing SSK technology from a Foreign Partner when all of the components required can easily be found within Indian Shores. An internal Indian Navy assessment a few days ago found that it would Cost India only 35000 crores to develop & build six Indian SSNs. We should scrap the P75I and use the funds available to develop and manufacture an Indian SSN & an Indian SSK. The Indian Navy plans to deploy a fleet of at least 30-35 submarines by 2030 to counter the PLAN’s fleet of over 80 boats. These will be a mix of 4-6 SSBNs, 6 SSNs & 20 SSKs. The Navy will be left with only six compromised Scorpenes and 8 old KILOS in 2030 unless we start induction of more SSKs quickly. India can buy time to develop its own SSK by using 20000 crores for off the shelf purchase of some 10 improved Kilo class submarines(at 300$mil each) these will bolster numbers while we use the remaining 40000 crores to develop & build a fleet of Indian Submarines.

http://bengalraider.blogspot.in/2016/09/indias-submarine-arm-road-ahead.html

@PARIKRAMA your thoughts

  • It came in my mail box today first half..
  • Its nicely written. And i appreciate the hard work he has put on this.
  • We might be able to build our own SSK as per the plan as i said before but it wont be indigenous (high percentage terms).
  • Also we have to be patient in terms of technology evolution based research and funding part of the same.
Hull-The are two parts to making a Submarine Hull, the first is the Metal & the second is the Fabrication of the Metal into a Hull capable of withstanding the extreme stress a Submarine has to undergo. The Metal will most likely be DMR292A Steel or the DMR249B Submarine Grade Steel developed in 2015 by SAIL At its Rourkela & Durgapur plants, Apart from This India has also made Titanium domestically which was used by the USSR for its ALFA class of SSNs during the Cold war. The Obvious candidates for fabricating a hull out of this metal are MDL & L&T .The Mazagon docks limited has had extensive experience in fabricating and building the Hulls of the HDW boats in the 1980’s and is building the Scorpene class Boats now. Larsen & Toubro has some of India’s most modern shipbuilding facilities at Hazira in Gujarat & Katupalli in Tamil Nadu. L&T has partnered HSL, DRDO & the Indian Navy in building the Hulls for the Arihant Class SSBN and hence has built a legitimate claim towards the fabrication of any future Indian SSK.
  • DMR292A is for exclusive UW usage.
  • DMR249B went to IAC1 but its more of tech passed on from Russia (equivalent is AB2 grade steel)
  • DMR249B also went to our indigenous ASW projects as well as Kilo sub repairs
  • Since we have the metallurgy and the experience of producing submarines in MDL, we have the skill sets.
  • Question is Line 1 MDL has scorpene upto 2021, and line 2 is ready from beginning this year where 5 subs can be parallely produces as i said here

upload_2016-9-4_17-45-8.png

https://defence.pk/threads/sensitiv...submarines-leaked.445677/page-10#post-8607640
  • Thus this line can be used for SSK production with almost negligible changes. But question is if you utilise a DCNS product you continue the production abilities as the entire chain of supply to manufacturing is completed as i said in earlier post
  • Here for our indigenous SSK project, the setting up will require some time surely. But thats very much doable.
  • Secondly unless the indigenous SSK uses a similar localised HLES 80 grade steel going into Scorpenes, the usage of DMR 292A will be a bit difficult.
  • The reason being 292A is used for black projects and you wont like it too much in public domain. A submarine construction and metallurgy is the easiest leaked information in modern espionage and intelligence operations.
  • Thats why it a good question if you want the top secret grade as a common pool for all types of sub fleet or not.

Sonar-The Obvious candidate for this would be the same USHUS Advanced Sonar currently in production at BEL Bangalore. As of today this Sonar is already operational in Five Sindhughosh class SSKs and the INS Arihant. Apart from this India also builds the Panchendriya Sonar System that is a unified submarine sonar and tactical control system & includes all types of sonar (passive, surveillance, ranging, intercept, obstacle avoidance and active).It is used for detecting and tracking enemy submarines, surface vessels, and torpedoes and can be used for underwater communication and avoiding obstacles. We can fully expect to see both these systems form the Sensory core of any future Indian SSK.

  • Sonar suite i am in full agreement. Its one of the products of BEL which has been developed pretty good
  • The unified suite is a very important part of overall submarine. By having it in house, it gives us a flexible approach
AIP-DRDO is currently developing at least two different types of AIP (Air independent Propulsion) Fuel Cell technologies called PAFC (Phosphoric acid fuel cell) & PEMFC (polymer electrolyte fuel cell). Both of these were supposed to be operational in time for installation into the Kalvari Class of Submarines, however Due to delays by DRDO these systems are only expected to be installed into the fifth & Sixth Kalvari class boats. As of now the Project is delayed and DRDO has yet to exhibit a working prototype.
Even if the DRDO AIP is not ready we have the option of purchasing commercially available AIP technologies from a variety of Global manufacturers if required.


Combat & Control Technologies-TATA Strategic Electronics Division partnered with DRDO to build the entire Control System for the Arihant SSBN project. Apart from this we also have the sonar ISS (Integrated Sonar Suite), state-of-the-art sonar developed for the 2nd SSBN called Aridaman by NPOL DRDO. This is a unified submarine sonar and tactical control system & includes all types of sonar (passive, surveillance, ranging, intercept, obstacle avoidance and active). It also features an underwater communications system. The hull features twin flank-array sonars and Rafael broadband expendable anti-torpedo countermeasures.
  • This is the beauty when you keep building submarines and localise some parts.
  • I said again and again proprietary work has been done in S-Cube of Scorpne SSKs and now its more pli S-Cube plus and just a little below S-Square.
  • couple it with modular design and flexibility of customizing the sensor arrays (number, angle and reach), it actually provides us a greater edge in hunting sub abilities.
  • Below is common to many points. Its from the same IN dox as pasted in the earlier post
upload_2016-9-4_19-6-21.png

Battery Pack-There are at least two Indian manufacturers that have a known capability to manufacture Batteries for Submarines .HBL Batteries headquartered at Hyderabad manufactures 12391 Wh to 40300 Wh Batteries for Submarines at its facilities in Telangana, Andhra Pradesh, Uttarakhand & Haryana. Exide Industries India also manufactures Batteries for Submarines and currently meets 100%of the requirement of Submarine batteries for the Indian Navy. Exide also has a license to export Submarine batteries and is currently closing an order for Submarine batteries to Algeria and Russia. Exide is on the list of registered Submarine battery vendors for the Russian Submarine Design Bureau RUBIN as well.

upload_2016-9-4_18-18-26.png


  • Kindly do look at earlier snap shot for reference
  • A Diesel Electric subs main portion is the engine and the battery pack. That both are of very critical nature
  • Above is the batteries produced by Exide for DE subs
  • The world 3 foremost countries researching NG batteries for submarine usage are Japan, France and Germany out of which Japan is the forefront among the 3.
  • The size, mass and power rating, time of life, cost of production are important area of research.
  • Unfortunately Exide is producing them as part of TOT absorption and we as a country have not done enough research to take it forward.
  • In India produced ones are Lead Acid Batteries or LABs not LiBs
  • A good LiB package will allow us to be submerged for 30 days at 4 knots speed giving us a range of over 3000+ km easily.
  • LiB are actually smaller in dimensions, compact as well as minimum 15-20% lighter in weight with much improved performance.
  • The bulkier the battery pack, the bigger is the space used and limitation of consistent power delivery, charging and life makes the submarine ability a limitation for prolong operations.


Primary Diesel Engine, Generator, Gear & Drivetrain-India has already developed an Electrical drivetrain along with the generator for the Arihant class SSBN, while the exact details of the system remain classified it is known that the entire system along with the Gearbox was supplied by Walchandnagar industries based in Maharashtra .This system can be adapted to create a drivetrain for an Indian SSK by replacing the Steam Turbine & Nuclear reactor with a Submarine Marine Diesel as the prime Mover. While there are numerous manufacturers of Marine Diesel Engines in India like Cummins India and Kirloskar Oil Engines Indian Limited, these manufacturers have never made an Engine for a Submarine. The good news is that Submarine Diesel Engines are commercially available from global manufacturers like MTU (which supplies the engine for the Arjun Tank) & Kawasaki.
  • Commercial engines available in the market is a solution no doubt but having inhouse gives the biggest advantage.
  • Kawasaki engines are licenced build version of MAN diesel and turbo engines used in initial Soryus.
  • Later kawasaki has used their own internal upgraded product line (12 V25/ 25SB)for Soryu and currently the same is not allowed for any export
  • MTU is pretty widely used and even Chile Scorpenes have MTU engines
  • The chief challenges thats associated with any Diesel Engine driven charging unite technology is
    • Higher power rating based on newer battery technologies
    • Rated power performance issues
    • Life of engine form deep overhaul is at present 10-12 years for MTU ones which needs to be increased further or during the lifetime of a submarine of say 30 years, we will require minimum 3 overhauls
    • Kawasaki is also same
    • In case LiB battery is used, the overhauls are shifted to 20-25 years period and Japan is targeting to make it 30 years for such deep overhaul.
  • So you see, there is a deeper research needed on this and present options available in the market may not suit us in the long run.
Torpedoes & Missiles (weaponry)-DRDO has developed at least two domestic Torpedo weapons systems that could find their way onto a domestic SSK. The Shenya Advanced Light Torpedo and the Varunastra Heavyweight Torpedo have both been test fired from Ships however Submarine firings have yet to be undertaken. The Submarine variants of both these torpedoes are very much still in further development even as their ship borne variants are being inducted. Apart from these products from DRDO Anil Ambani has also tied up with Atlas GMbh of Germany to manufacture & sell the Seahake range of Torpedoes to the Indian Navy. We can fully expect all of these torpedoes to make it into the Arsenal of an Indian DE submarine. The candidates for Missiles that shall arm any future Indian SSK are the Russian Klub/Kalibr & the Indian Brahmos. The Submarines launched version of the Brahmos is still in development and has been tested once from a pontoon platform in 2013. A future Indian SSK shall in all probability be armed with a 16 cell VLS launcher developed within India by L&T for Brahmos Missiles while also carrying Klub/Kalibr units to be fired via Torpedo Tubes.
  • Sub launched Missiles are not an issue as we have combinations available.
  • But indigenous solution- pls refer to earlier snapshot for the same as we are facing challenges of time constaint and rapid technology evolution
  • Torpedo Varunastra needs some more refinement and tech and hence a licence production was initiated for F21
  • VLS platform for 16 cells will mean the submarine has to be around 3000+ tonnes easily

Anechoic tiles & Sound Insulation- Once again Technologies that were developed in India for the Arihant class of Submarines shall come in useful as any future Indian SSK can use the same anechoic tiles developed for the INS Arihant by a rubber vulcanizing firm based out of Mysore. The name of this firm remains classified.
  • Yes we have indigenously developed this tech a lot.
  • We also got to learn a lot from different Russian and French sides via Sub we operate. SO our product is much improved.
India really needs to think whether it needs to spend 60000 crore rupees on purchasing SSK technology from a Foreign Partner when all of the components required can easily be found within Indian Shores. An internal Indian Navy assessment a few days ago found that it would Cost India only 35000 crores to develop & build six Indian SSNs. We should scrap the P75I and use the funds available to develop and manufacture an Indian SSN & an Indian SSK. The Indian Navy plans to deploy a fleet of at least 30-35 submarines by 2030 to counter the PLAN’s fleet of over 80 boats. These will be a mix of 4-6 SSBNs, 6 SSNs & 20 SSKs. The Navy will be left with only six compromised Scorpenes and 8 old KILOS in 2030 unless we start induction of more SSKs quickly. India can buy time to develop its own SSK by using 20000 crores for off the shelf purchase of some 10 improved Kilo class submarines(at 300$mil each) these will bolster numbers while we use the remaining 40000 crores to develop & build a fleet of Indian Submarines.

  • Kilo class 636 plan was forwarded by Reliance -pipavav last year under which 2 were to be built abroad and rest 10 in India.
  • The cost was much more than said $300 Mn and technology transfer cost is putting it almost double that range.
  • MOD/GOI did not say much on this as sources said 636 does not give any additional capability build up in our MIC and for future p

++
I still agree what IN said here in the same dox
upload_2016-9-4_19-11-0.png


The only point i wish to make on this is instead of having anew separate P75I sub, we should get something similar to Shortfin and utilize the line 2 in MDL for the subs. This gives us the access to the Barracuda tech which can easily flow into our own indigenous SSBN/SSN/SSK all throughout.

And i will point clearly. - Scorpenes are not compromised. not yesterday nor in last 5-6 years or even today. We should not be so blind that we believe everything is compromised if its imported or if there is any case of so called leak of lowest form of security dox called restricted.
 
@PARIKRAMA thanks a lot bro for such detailed reply, it clears a lot of doubts
I have bookmarked it for future reference
I am overwhelmed

offtopic
-- Do you have any idea what's going on with NAL Saras?
Has that project been shelved for good? or there is some hope left?
Someone posted a picture of it taxying in IAF colors. Is something happening behind the curtain that we don't know?

-- Any update on Rustom-2? why is it taking so long?

regards
 
Do you have any idea what's going on with NAL Saras?

Has that project been shelved for good? or there is some hope left?

Someone posted a picture of it taxying in IAF colors. Is something happening behind the curtain that we don't know?

  • There was financing issue in this project.
  • First prototype was upgraded extensively.
  • Second prototype crashed.
  • This caused first proto to be checked rechecked, systems being changed and a lot of time it remained in hanger
  • Third prototype was suppose to be under construction
  • There was a talk that finances are released from government when NAL submitted a new improved Saras product
  • This may be either the first prototype getting improved as per the improved product that was submitted to government for financial assistance.
  • I don't have any confirmation of finances released as of now.. will ask next week my source on this...


Any update on Rustom-2? why is it taking so long?
  • Project is delayed
  • Suppose to be completed in next year first quarter
  • Seems DRDO internal financial allocation is an issue
  • Also we are facing some challenges for endurance perspective
 
I don't have any confirmation of finances released as of now.. will ask next week my source on this...

plz do ask.

Suppose to be completed in next year first quarter

It haven't even left the ground yet then how would they complete it in such a short time frame

Also we are facing some challenges for endurance perspective

How did they deduce it without even a single flight?

plz ask your sources when it is going to take its maiden flight
 
How did they deduce it without even a single flight?

plz ask your sources when it is going to take its maiden flight

They were suppose to test a proto in July end this year when they got a shocker. As compared to required weight of around 1.8tonnes it's weight is closer to 2.3tonnes approx. With that weight it cannot sustain flight for time specified and range as well.

Rustom2 needs to become leaner and prove flight endurance of 36hours
 
Straight talk , if we are ready for 6. We are ready for more.

If we aren't wanting more , we don't need these 6 too.

Slight wrong in your argument.

Even if there is no tangible evidence to prove that the compromise is significant enough that put the subs under danger, even then the IN would be skeptic whether all that has been out is covered in investigation.

So they may not have the enough reasons to cancel all 6, they may not want to go further than this number. Their fear would be legitimate
 
Back
Top Bottom