Blue Marlin
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2015
- Messages
- 6,688
- Reaction score
- 6
- Country
- Location
so what you are trying to say is that you are holding kashmir so that pakistan can try to get it. and justify your claim to kashmir?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
so what you are trying to say is that you are holding kashmir so that pakistan can try to get it. and justify your claim to kashmir?
so what you are trying to say is that you are holding kashmir so that pakistan can try to get it. and justify your claim to kashmir?
thats true but remember so are the pakistanis the chinese and so on you are not the only one . where you focus on one topic another country exploits another vulnerability and uses it to their advantage.Indian planners and strategists plan way ahead.
thats true but remember so are the pakistanis the chinese and so on you are not the only one . where you focus on one topic another country exploits another vulnerability and uses it to their advantage.
thats true.We have too many vulnerabilities - so does the rest...so it all boils down to who does what.
why did Pakistan and india partition. because muslims and hindus wanted their own land. now kashmir being majority muslim was to be part of Pakistan.
it makes sense, muslim country and muslim state. but the leader was hindu so it was obvious who he was going to choose. also he had no choice as Pakistan invaded kashmir and took was was right fully theirs and what the Kashmiris wanted. this is seen across the whole of kashmir. people in the indian occupied kashmir waiving Pakistani flags and burning indian flags it like you wan to be apart of a group you wan tot be in but you r current group dozens t allow you to lean and turtles you in to submission. sorry if it seems very one sided but thats how i see it it, logic. i would not not imagine indian Kashmiris wanting to be indian un-less you're either hindu or sikh . its religion that started this in the first place.
Oh Chaha jaan, If its going to be an offensive action that already means start of kind of full scale war, unless pakistans hands are tied down with global pressures.
Surgical strikes can be of various forms, air drop paratroopers, or heli attack or full fledged air strikes. Depends upon what objectives have to be achieved.
I guess it was pretty late night for you, so you lost the context of our discussion. :p
Now if you insist on that, perhaps a mental asylum (or at least some sort of treatment) will be warranted.
Sorry to Say :p
firstly Hindus didn't want separate country from Muslims so this is your first misconception
Did not know this. RIP Dixit. He was a true nationalist, unlike the saffronists, a wise one at that.Rajiv Dixit died i think 2-3 yrs back, OP is a moron for posting old videos for rabble rousing.
Beta ye paragraph abu ne likh ke dia ya ami ne??well i see 1 pak soldier= 10 Indian soldiers ... hahaha so you counted how many soldiers infiltrated our soil??? meh PA occupied emptied posts in kargil... and IA retaliated ..... oops suddenly blunders becoming victory..... haha
You may say that it is never going to happen. But the threat has a huge, I mean huuuge troll value, which will easily suck off a couple of percentage points from Pakistan's GDP. So it is a good idea to let the idea hang in air. I don't think these three people, especially Swami and Dixit, both being intellectuals, seriously want India to attack and gain back Kashmir. Both know the troll value of the threat. And it riles up Pakistanis so much, they will trip upside down, Karachi and Lahore get clogged by Hafiz Saeed processions. Despite India hearing such similar threats from Pakistan everyday to take back J&K. India's cool is its strength and any soft weapons like this should be used effectively.Never gonna happen and not in the list of "To Do things".
We are okay with LoC and IB.
Our policy is live and let live
or if hurt then give the pain back.
thats true but remember so are the pakistanis the chinese and so on you are not the only one . where you focus on one topic another country exploits another vulnerability and uses it to their advantage.
Read Congress leaders statements of 1920, especially those Hindu leaders who were living in Muslim majority provinces.
Please do not spread 5th grade history book based knowledge on an international forum.
Thank you.
firstly Hindus didn't want separate country from Muslims so this is your first misconception only Muslim wanted separate country.secondly Kashmir was never of Pakistan as Kashmir was given the right to choose and king as a representative of people he choose to remain independent.No one consider religion as a base for separate country so It is non sense to say that just because Kashmir was Muslim majority region It should have been with Pakistan.
You go and read the events around 1920. Also read an example about Jallianwallah bagh, which happened during a procession taken out in support of two leaders Saifudding Kitchlew and Satya Pal.Deepak bhai
Read Congress leaders statements of 1920, especially those Hindu leaders who were living in Muslim majority provinces.
Please do not spread 5th grade history book based knowledge on an international forum.
Thank you.
Beta ye paragraph abu ne likh ke dia ya ami ne??
You go and read the events around 1920. Also read an example about Jallianwallah bagh, which happened during a procession taken out in support of two leaders Saifudding Kitchlew and Satya Pal.
You ignore the statements of Congress President and higher ups and cherry-pick the words of right most fringe elements of the party. And then you ignore the words straight from the horses(aka Jinnah, the A-Z of Muslim League) mouth.
Pakistan has a history of short sightedness. But we don't underestimate.
Hi, Can you share them ?