India’s arms mostly target Pakistan

[IND151]

1948: Kashmir chose to remain independent, Pakistan attacked, and Kashmir asked India for help, how is that India's fault?

1965: Operations Gibraltar and Grand Slam. 'nuff said.

1984 (Siachen): Pakistan launched mountaneering expedition over disputed, LoC territory.

1999: NLI took over peaks when no one was there.

Accept it, 1971 was the only war we started.

----------------------------------------------
LOl. Are these facts or fantasy of yours?

1948-Kashmir hindu ruler being bias obviously went to India. Duhhhh!!!!!! No-brainer.
he wanted to give the whole of Kashmir to India, but we got back one-third. Win for Pakistan.

1965-War was a stalemate, but your Indian generals were boasting of drinking beer in Lahore Gymkhana by nightfall, but your forces had to withdraw with tails under thier legs when they faced fierce Pakistani resistance.

1971- Pakistan was defeated but only because the whole population of East Pakistan were against it and the bengalis had received training and weapons from terrorist India.

1984- It was India who sneakily captured the empty heights of Siachen as they did not have the balls to fight for it.

1999- Kargil was a military victory for us, but a diplomatic defeat as our PM ran to USA to save himself.

Well we can argue on these points till the 'Fat Lady Sings', but it will be pointless as in an argument no one wins.

But dont worry very soon we will stop arguing and will take action again. But its upto you wi.mps to respond in kind.
Bohot Maza aiga......

Pakistan tried to take Kashmir by force. Maharaja then decided to take help of India and signed instrument of accession

 

[MooshMoosh]

Why can't Pakistan and India accept this treaty. Let one keep the Northern Kashmir and the other keep the Southern Kashmir, simple as that look at the map, it's big enough. Why want full Kashmir?

 

[danish_vij]

India have the right to arm itself and it is rightly doing so as it is scared of Pakistan. Now if both countries were even or if Pakistan had more army than India than India would have been in trouble. But right now even though India has more men, more resources, it lacks the will power to fight Pakistan. Many times we have heard and read of Cold Start Doctrine or some other major exercise initiated by India after every attack on India. But India does not want war and backs off.
One reason is that it cannot guarantee that if they do go to war, they will win outright as nuclear missiles in Pakistan can spoil their dreams. Also, there economy is not doing too well right now as is the world and to go to war, will certainly reduce their economy by a big margin.
So let them buy all those fancy equipment and waste US$38 billion on their military. Because we all know that they lack the b.alls to attack us.

why will india attack u? we r already fed up with naxalites....we don't want to hav taliban and LeT...
btw according to ur logic america doesn't attack mexico bcoz they lack balls to attack them
please for god sake get out of ur dreams...and stop making self satisfactory statements....

 

[danish_vij]

So when is the next attack happening from Pakistan. Its been a while since you guys did Kargil. Its getting quite boring



Offcourse how can we.
1 Pakistani Muslim = 10 Hindus

lol are u talking yeah longewala

China's current territorial disputes are all limited by nature.

The disputes to the East are all maritime sea-based disputes, which are limited to naval skirmishes and not to land war.

The dispute with India is based on land rather than sea, however the dispute is limited by the formidable barrier of the Himalayas, which limits the potential danger to small-scale border clashes.

There is no real possibility in either case for an extended full-scale war.

yeah u r right gone r thy days of war now every1 has understood the importance of economy....no one wants a war on there own land not evn US!!!

China's current territorial disputes are all limited by nature.

The disputes to the East are all maritime sea-based disputes, which are limited to naval skirmishes and not to land war.

The dispute with India is based on land rather than sea, however the dispute is limited by the formidable barrier of the Himalayas, which limits the potential danger to small-scale border clashes.

There is no real possibility in either case for an extended full-scale war.

yeah u r right gone r thy days of war now every1 has understood the importance of economy....no one wants a war on there own land not evn US!!!

China's current territorial disputes are all limited by nature.

The disputes to the East are all maritime sea-based disputes, which are limited to naval skirmishes and not to land war.

The dispute with India is based on land rather than sea, however the dispute is limited by the formidable barrier of the Himalayas, which limits the potential danger to small-scale border clashes.

There is no real possibility in either case for an extended full-scale war.

yeah u r right gone r thy days of war now every1 has understood the importance of economy....no one wants a war on there own land not evn US!!!

 

[danish_vij]

India prefers bullying, it talks about merging Nepal,Maldives etc with India, created and supported insurgency in Sri lanka, invaded E.Pakistan. There is a reason why those countries are joining "Bhaarat containment policy". Most of those countries are fed up with Indian bullying.



We did take you head on and it resulted in a stalemate, the fact is that India with all of its conventional might cannot dominate Pakistan. My point was taking India head on, diplomatic and economic front. India has lost its chance/ability to attack Pakistan.



That is a fallacy that is fed to you in schools, it was India which initiated/created reasons for war every single time.



lol, your school indotrination is showing its fruit..keep going!



We will wait and see.

sir please for ur kind information..........WE R NOT TAUGHT ABOUT WARS IN SCHOOLS!!!!(only ancient wars r taught...not ind-pak)...we r jst taught about partition....
does school curriculum consist of war??? jst a ques no need to b offended

 

[Windjammer]

lol are u talking yeah longewala

It's ironic how you Indians never stop cheering your self on Longewala, (which is under some dispute between your army and air force)....yet you conveniently ignore or rather forget about.....Kalaikunda.....Pathankot and more to the relation the devastation of Mukerian Rail Yards......did IA ever disclose how many tanks were destroyed in the strike. !!!

 

[danish_vij]

What proof do you have of India supplying terrorists to Pakistan? Do you guys even have one prisoner, who admits to have carried out bomb blasts after being trained by RAW. Don't bring in the two Singh spies, they are RAW agents, not terrorists.

no no yaar isi called him and said inform all pdf member that raw agents r terrorist

It's ironic how you Indians never stop cheering your self on Longewala, (which is under some dispute between your army and air force)....yet you conveniently ignore or rather forget about.....Kalaikunda.....Pathankot and more to the relation the devastation of Mukerian Rail Yards......did IA ever disclose how many tanks were destroyed in the strike. !!!

omg from whre di du get that one....haha my grandfather was there n punjab my grand naany live in pathankot lol....they never told me that pakistanis came here.....and who told u about mukerian?? army pak news.......!!!! any international source exept wikipedia!! lol
post added:- its not evn on wikipedia lol...

 

[asad71]

1.Build up may be as it is, but India's next target is BD. Reasons:

a. India is too scared of PRC.

b. India is mortified of Pakistan.

c. During this AL regime specially, India has been active in creating internal problems in BD.

d. Through their local plants, India has been working relentlessly to cut BD's umbilical cord with the Muslim world.

e. India deploys all means to ensure that BD and Pakistan do not get close. Remember the scrapped BD cricket tour for no other reason than this? Pakistan did not understand what was happening and allowed a BD-Pak bitterness - another victory for India.

2. Not only BD patriotic elements but also China, Pakistan and the Ummah should take note of this.

 

[EzioAltaïr]

1.Build up may be as it is, but India's next target is BD. Reasons:

a. India is too scared of PRC.

b. India is mortified of Pakistan.

c. During this AL regime specially, India has been active in creating internal problems in BD.

d. Through their local plants, India has been working relentlessly to cut BD's umbilical cord with the Muslim world.

e. India deploys all means to ensure that BD and Pakistan do not get close. Remember the scrapped BD cricket tour for no other reason than this? Pakistan did not understand what was happening and allowed a BD-Pak bitterness - another victory for India.

2. Not only BD patriotic elements but also China, Pakistan and the Ummah should take note of this.

The day when asad71 hung a banner outside his house saying, "I'm a trolling conspiracy theorist".

 

[Shinigami]

The day when asad71 hung a banner outside his house saying, "I'm a trolling conspiracy theorist".

Its cute how the BDs try to gain some level of self importance by thinking that india gives a damn about them

 

[Koovie]

It's ironic how you Indians never stop cheering your self on Longewala, (which is under some dispute between your army and air force)....yet you conveniently ignore or rather forget about.....Kalaikunda.....Pathankot and more to the relation the devastation of Mukerian Rail Yards......did IA ever disclose how many tanks were destroyed in the strike. !!!

Thats the rivalry between the IAF and the IA ..

Besides, all your given examples had no effect on the outcome of the war.

 

[danish_vij]

Its cute how the BDs try to gain some level of self importance by thinking that india gives a damn about them

hahaha!!! u took the right shot

 

[OrionHunter]

Indian is Pakistan's mortal enemy, those who downplay the mortal/existential danger posed to Pakistan by India are naive and retarded. India cannot befriended, it can only be coexisted with but not without a credible conventional and strategic equilibrium. Indian establishment only understands the language of power, which i like to call the "Brasstacks Syndrome". In order to exist as a nation, Pakistan must take India head on, and never give in to any bullying. India's best chance to have a world without, Pakistan is by creating and fueling insurgency and terror in Pakistan which they actively are for last decade. Pakistan should make it clear to India that there is always a reply and they will see it, hear it, feel it and would have to live with it post 2014.

You're a funny man! The crap you've just spewed is beyond bizarre! You have started talking like an uneducated Jamaati who doesn't know his beans!

You say, "In order to exist as a nation, Pakistan must take India head on". Really? How so? Your economy is a fraction of India's and trying to 'keep up with the Joneses' just isn't an option for you. You guys will be bled economically to death if you even try! And your nukes are just expensive toys, and will never ever be used in spite of all the bluster emanating from Pakistan. So your so called 'force equalizer' is just so much hot air. And conventional force asymmetry between India and Pakistan will always exist - till the end of days.

You guys have been fueling insurgency in India since the last several decades in order to grab Kashmir and have been trying your darnedest to wrest Kashmir by conventional means (Op Grand Slam, Op Gibraltar, Kargil etc) since 1947 but have come a cropper each time. Unfortunately, the Pakistani psyche is reflected by what one of your FCNA generals, Gen Hasan said before your Kargil disaster. He said famously to Mush, "Capturing Siachen will not be a problem at all because Hindu Banyas can't fight!"

If 'Hindu Banyas' can't fight, as your invincible generals contend, then the million dollar question is: Why has Pakistan failed to capture Kashmir since 1947?

No prizes for guessing why!

Cheers! Have a nice day!

 

[shree835]

It's ironic how you Indians never stop cheering your self on Longewala, (which is under some dispute between your army and air force)....yet you conveniently ignore or rather forget about.....Kalaikunda.....Pathankot and more to the relation the devastation of Mukerian Rail Yards......did IA ever disclose how many tanks were destroyed in the strike. !!!

THETHAR Windjammer CHICHA...WHAT WAS THE RESULT...???...

 

[Windjammer]

Thats the rivalry between the IAF and the IA ..

Actually, the claims made by the Indian Army are pure trash.

Battle of Longewala: Truth must be told

Besides, all your given examples had no effect on the outcome of the war.

And what overall effect did Longewala had on the outcome of war in the Western Sector. !!