What's new

India rejects China's contention on signing NPT, says France was included in NSG without signing it

So , US teaches China hot to fit bolt in rockets after it keep failing .......So China keep asking Russians to design its plane / chopper , and then shamelessly claim their own Design & develop. lol

Stick with France and don't drag China in it. You guys claim to be more powerful then France not China. Don't try to change the topic.
 
.
We don't need a reason. Since we have veto.

The reason given is simply political fluff, like we did when we vetoed the Syria resolution in the UNSC.

You can come up with any reason you like, it's all meaningless. Geopolitics is all about national interests. If it doesn't serve our interests we will veto it.

You don't, others do. China is not a founding member of NSG and itself became a member in 2004.

But you are right about national interests. I think that there will be a price for China's vote, question is what?
 
.
Stick with France and don't drag China in it. You guys claim to be more powerful then France not China. Don't try to change the topic.
Who claim that? BTW way India is world leader in fast breeder reactors.

Powerful we are in military terms. Isnt you consider China powerful?

why have different parameters ?
 
Last edited:
.
Vrs the country who was occupied by England for more then 100 years. Before pointing on others note that four finger is towards your self.

bottom line: Respect others and they also have valid points against you

Coming from a member who was part of that occupation and infinite others..

Bottom line,Occupation by another country is not a parameter in most of these "Clubs".Hell,USA was British colony till few hundred years ago.so was Britain,a "French" "Colony"..History has its own way of mockery.

What is the rule of inclusion NSG was,all the member have to agree about its inclusion.There was no "hard n Fast" rule about NPT.If it was,even China wouldn't get included,forget France.China neither is a NPT signatory state,nor MTCR signatory.Hell,it was one of the newest member of NSG.

I know,Brain deads will yell,"China is a P5 member",but in NSG,P5 doesn't mean a thing.
 
. .
Yes imported superpower. France produce all weapons by itself and Mighty Indian asked French helps many times. Grownup and talk like a mature fellow
No problem at all. We are much bigger than France and have a huge economy as compared to France. Thx.
 
.
Coming from a member who was part of that occupation and infinite others..

Bottom line,Occupation by another country is not a parameter in most of these "Clubs".Hell,USA was British colony till few hundred years ago.so was Britain,a "French" "Colony"..History has its own way of mockery.

What is the rule of inclusion NSG was,all the member have to agree about its inclusion.There was no "hard n Fast" rule about NPT.If it was,even China wouldn't get included,forget France.China neither is a NPT signatory state,nor MTCR signatory.Hell,it was one of the newest member of NSG.

I know,Brain deads will yell,"China is a P5 member",but in NSG,P5 doesn't mean a thing.

Your statement its self is self explanatory and if you read my post again then you will understand that we don't have to think others inferiors and it is very common practice in case of Indians that they think that they are far superiors to anyone in this world for example US need India, China is bubble economy, Pakistan is nothing, France is small, UK is tiny. Please stop these bullshits and try to learn to respect others. And as far as South East Asia concerned we have a record history of being slave or occupied country in the world. So except this reality.

As far as NSG is concerned your post its self is an answer and if china oppose this then India will never part of NSG because China is a full member of NSG and India need approval of all NSG members.

No problem at all. We are much bigger than France and have a huge economy as compared to France. Thx.

You called services based economy a huge economy? what if these services stop suddenly due to some reasons?
 
.
Your statement its self is self explanatory and if you read my post again then you will understand that we don't have to think others inferiors and it is very common practice in case of Indians that they think that they are far superiors to anyone in this world for example US need India, China is bubble economy, Pakistan is nothing, France is small, UK is tiny. Please stop these bullshits and try to learn to respect others. And as far as South East Asia concerned we have a record history of being slave or occupied country in the world. So except this reality.

As far as NSG is concerned your post its self is an answer and if china oppose this then India will never part of NSG because China is a full member of NSG and India need approval of all NSG members.

First,learn a bit of valid arguments as well as a bit of english to express yourself properly.

Second,its not a kid's cricket match where a bully can say,hey,I'm not going to take in our game.NSG is a premier body where,you can't block anyone's entry indefinitely,if it is something like India.well,for Pakistan,they can argue for decades about its proliferation and all,but on what ground they can block when almost every members are supporting India's entry??Also,China is not a very powerful player in these "Clubs" as China itself has very shady records...

Whatever,India is on the verge of defeating all these "oppositions",we have our way.You should bother about Pakistan's case.Nobody is taking it seriously,why??
 
. .
Yes..but still better than being ruled and plundered by the british for 200 years.

yes yes,we share the same history till independence.
but yet,better than Pakistan,who is still being dictated by foreign powers..such a shame..
 
.
First,learn a bit of valid arguments as well as a bit of english to express yourself properly.

Second,its not a kid's cricket match where a bully can say,hey,I'm not going to take in our game.NSG is a premier body where,you can't block anyone's entry indefinitely,if it is something like India.well,for Pakistan,they can argue for decades about its proliferation and all,but on what ground they can block when almost every members are supporting India's entry??Also,China is not a very powerful player in these "Clubs" as China itself has very shady records...

Whatever,India is on the verge of defeating all these "oppositions",we have our way.You should bother about Pakistan's case.Nobody is taking it seriously,why??

First learn how to respect others and then we talk
 
.
:usflag:Well done USA :flame::flame::flame:
3 birds in one stone bravo:tup:

1. Indian won't get anything that it hasn't already but rejection will be seen as Chinese opposition
2. China has to veto both. Well I don't wana say thing in brothers relations may be they know what's going to happen
3. Nationalist govt in India has to act on this issue or they will look weak. Meaning good gain for USA

Nothing to lose everything to gain. They played the game well:usflag:

Only thing to see is how GOI react
 
.
You called services based economy a huge economy? what if these services stop suddenly due to some reasons?
Service is thing of the past, and pity your guys are stuck there. India will the new manufacturing hub, automotives to start with.
 
.
We don't need a reason. Since we have veto.

The reason given is simply political fluff, like we did when we vetoed the Syria resolution in the UNSC.

You can come up with any reason you like, it's all meaningless. Geopolitics is all about national interests. If it doesn't serve our interests we will veto it.

UN security council will be reformed and this veto rant will be booted out !
 
.
Service is thing of the past, and pity your guys are stuck there. India will the new manufacturing hub, automotives to start with.

Not now. So your statement its self prove that my statement is right. It is pity that guys you guys always in state of denial all the time
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom