India ready to hold talks with Pakistan but in pleasant environment, says envoy

[BetterPakistan]

try it its not that you only have the bullets we are more than eager to respond back .... bring it on

You bring it on as your RSS and BJP demanding and we are ready to tackle you everywhere.

For the third time, I'm asking you the same question now... WHAT DOES PAKISTAN BRING TO THE NEGOTIATING TABLE?

Everything what that discussion table required and above all we were there to start it and you never showed up.
Agar abhi bhi tjhe smjh nhi aye baat meri to ja jakar soo jaa

 

[dadeechi]

If Pakistani policy makers are wise enough they would immediately drop the policy of capturing Kashmir and place an offer on the table to convert LOC as International border.

Pakistan today needs peace and certainty across its borders to make CPEC a success and India is headed by Modi who can deliver that like he did with Bangladesh.

If Pakistan continues to take its traditional line, there is a risk that it losses all as Time, Money and Legality are all on India's side.

Kicking the Kashmir ball down the line works perfectly for India. Can Pakistan afford to kick it down the line?

 

[GURU DUTT]

You bring it on as your RSS and BJP demanding and we are ready to tackle you everywhere.



Everything what that discussion table required and above all we were there to start it and you never showed up.
Agar abhi bhi tjhe smjh nhi aye baat meri to ja jakar soo jaa

no we wont fire the first bullet as we know your attitude we will wait till it becomes so unbearable that you do what we want ... we can wait for the right time

If Pakistani policy makers are wise enough they would immediately drop the policy of capturing Kashmir and place an offer on the table to convert LOC as International border.

Pakistan today needs peace and certainty across its borders to make CPEC a success and India is headed by Modi who can deliver that like he did with Bangladesh.

If Pakistan continues to take its traditional line, there is a risk that it losses all as Time, Money and Legality are all on India's side.

Kicking the Kashmir ball down the line works perfectly for India. Can Pakistan afford to kick it down the line?

no there establishment will never drop the kashmir clause its the sole asset on which there existence or say need for existence is based there wont be any talks but surely 5th episode is not too far away and we are ready for it

 

[Samrat420]

You bring it on as your RSS and BJP demanding and we are ready to tackle you everywhere.



Everything what that discussion table required and above all we were there to start it and you never showed up.
Agar abhi bhi tjhe smjh nhi aye baat meri to ja jakar soo jaa

LOL.. This guy doesn't even understand the meaning of ‘negotiation'. Kis mandbuddhi ghonchu se paala para hai??

 

[GURU DUTT]

For the third time, I'm asking you the same question now... WHAT DOES PAKISTAN BRING TO THE NEGOTIATING TABLE?

your wasting your time even there elite dont have any answer to your question

 

[Genghis khan1]

convert LOC as International border.

Not gonna happen, that's what India wants. There is no reason Pakistan accept this. Best bet is that Pakistan gave up Azad Kashmir, India give up their side. Kashmir will be Independent land. But if India brought up Gilgit-Baltistan into Kashmir than everybody will be on square one. That's the reason most Kashmiris think there is no peaceful solution to Kashmir.

 

[IceCold]

Why do we even have embassies is beyond me? Why not simply recall our ambassador and send their packing. There is hardly a need for India Pakistan to maintain diplomatic relations with each other. Kashmir is disputed and no amount of diplomacy is going to change that.
It would be better if we open an Israeli embassy in Pakistan. Normalising of relations with Israel has a much higher change than it ever would be with India.

 

[Samrat420]

Not gonna happen, that's what India wants. There is no reason Pakistan accept this. Best bet is that Pakistan gave up Azad Kashmir, India give up their side. Kashmir will be Independent land. But if India brought up Gilgit-Baltistan into Kashmir than everybody will be on square one. That's the reason most Kashmiris think there is no peaceful solution to Kashmir.

This is your solution bro? Pakistan would let go of the puny strip of land you call AJK and hold on to the vast GB. And in return, India would let go of whole J&K? You seriously think this is a practical idea? Would you please explain why would India ever agree to this folly?

 

[Joe Shearer]

If environment is pleasant friendly what will be purpose of dialogue? dialogue is held in hostile environment to achieve friendlier environment.

What a shame excuse from Modi-fide India!

A peculiar interpretation. Then Russia and India would never have agreed to ally themselves in 1971. Then the US would never have come to the defence of the UK in WWII. Then Pakistan would never have agreed to join CENTO and SEATO.

Did you think before writing this?

 

[dadeechi]

Not gonna happen, that's what India wants. There is no reason Pakistan accept this. Best bet is that Pakistan gave up Azad Kashmir, India give up their side. Kashmir will be Independent land. But if India brought up Gilgit-Baltistan into Kashmir than everybody will be on square one. That's the reason most Kashmiris think there is no peaceful solution to Kashmir.

Of course GB is part of Kashmir.

Independent Kashmir is a non-starter. Neither India, Pakistan nor China would like the idea of an Independent Kashmir on their borders with destabilizing link to Afghanistan on the other.

If at all anyone agrees to the independent Kashmir proposal that would India as it would successful break the link between China and Pakistan including CPEC.

 

[Joe Shearer]

Very diplomatic response...i hope the Pakistani negotiators are this clever tooo...

Oh, they are, they are.

 

[Joe Shearer]

Yes Indian expect Pakistan to be a well baked sponge cake they will pick knife and take a slice..which is simply not possible..

I couldn't agree more. It is not at all well-baked, at the moment.

 

[Genghis khan1]

This is your solution bro? Pakistan would let go of the puny strip of land you call AJK and hold on to the vast GB. And in return, India would let go of whole J&K? You seriously think this is a practical idea? Would you please explain why would India ever agree to this folly?

Not mine, I think (per musharraf) that's what Pakistani side had on table as the final offer, while Indian were bringing GB in. GB people are different from Kashmiris, plus it's Pakistan north with all the water and link to China. so there is no way Pakistan would include that into Kashmir. India is on the losing side, cuz local population don't want Indians in their land. If things don't start moving soon, then Pakistan will do the same it did in 90s. Make India bleed in Kashmir that they either India give up or forced to go to UN for a plebiscite. Both way India will be on the losing end.

@dadeechi

 

[Joe Shearer]

Pleasant environment like arming afghan's with tanks and artillery to counter Pakistan on their borders or by sending more Kulbhushan Jadhav to Pakistan to create unrest here...



I bet they have forgotten Kabbadi and hockey matches hosted by India....

I am a huge fan of Indian comedy...

Excuse me? Have you ambitions to be a comic actor yourself, or was that post just a bit of schoolboy carelessness? What tanks and artillery has India given to Afghanistan?

So be it .
On topic :Well this is just an anticipatory bail .He knows there would be no such environment is possible even in future .
Because one side becomes too strong to consider other as an equal dialogue partner .Ego and no profit wont allow this initiative .

It was a silly piece of illogical argument. Agreeing to these so readily shows that we have not applied our mind. the difference would be clear then.

well when you know every thing about us why waste time in talk you keep doing what you always did and we will do what we require to protect owr interests ... jhagra kiss baat ka hai

Ignore the idiot. Read his previous posts to understand why. He has not a single sensible statement to his name. Just drivel.

Ignore him.

 

[AKD]

There's no point in talks because there are three sects : Govt, Non-state actors and military and the latter two doesn't want any peace with India