What's new

India puts off re-launch of failed satellite

Epic Fail :yahoo: :yahoo: :laughcry: :laughcry: :chilli: :chilli:

' 25 December 2010 Last updated at 14:34 GMT ' <----- Old News

Source - BBC News - India satellite rocket explodes after take-off

You are dumber than I thought. Your satellite blew up, died, fell off like a drunk in 2010. That was the failed satellite. Epic fail. Yeah, up your epic failed arse.

"Two earlier attempts at lift-off three years ago had failed - in December 2010, the rocket disappeared in a plume of smoke moments after its launch.

The first attempt to launch it in April 2010 had also been unsuccessful."
 
Are you hunting for a certificate for Idiocy?

The satellites in question are different.
You are dumber than I thought. Your satellite blew up, died, fell off like a drunk on 2010. That was the failed satellite. Epic fail. Yeah, up your epic failed arse.

"Two earlier attempts at lift-off three years ago had failed - in December 2010, the rocket disappeared in a plume of smoke moments after its launch.

The first attempt to launch it in April 2010 had also been unsuccessful."
 
Super Epic Fail Again.

The first news was from 3 years back. - The name of failed satellite - 'GSAT- 5P'
The satellite in question now - The name is - 'GSAT-14'

:thinktank: <--- Take this award. Troll King :D

Stop digging. You are making a bigger fool of yourself. You look like a failure just like your failed satellite.

Are you hunting for a certificate for Idiocy?

The satellites in question are different.

One look at you and we all know what idiocy is.

Edit: funny to see stupid Indians fell flat on their face, epic fail.
 
working satellite are in orbit, failed satellite are blown up pieces of scrap metal that doesn't make it into orbit.

The previous indian satellites of the same class (look at the payload, before you ask stupid questions) were therefore "failures", hence the title.
 
Its BBC.................How can they digest the Fact that India is Launching Rocket with Cryogenic engine.................

How can they digest the fact that India even has a rocket? The HORROR of it. They send 280 million with which we built rocket and a plane and a submarine and a carrier. Their aid pays of all of this man.

working satellite are in orbit, failed satellite are blown up pieces of scrap metal that doesn't make it into orbit.

The previous indian satellites of the same class (look at the payload, before you ask stupid questions) were therefore "failures", hence the title.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not one shred of counter argument. Here take your award - :thinktank:
One look - may be but a detailed look sure does bring out someone else's idiocy :D
Stop digging. You are making a bigger fool of yourself. You look like a failure just like your failed satellite.



One look at you and we all know what idiocy is.

Edit: funny to see stupid Indians fell flat on their face, epic fail.
 
Not one shred of counter argument. Here take your award - :thinktank:
One look - may be but a detailed look sure does bring out someone else's idiocy :D

:rofl: You failed again on your epic fail, just like your failed satellite failing again. Stupid Indians like you don't know what hit you. It's your face hitting the ground. You fell flat on your face.

On topic, Indian launch failed BBC News - India cryogenic satellite space launch fails. Indian launch failed again, kaboom in the sky, BBC News - India satellite rocket explodes after take-off. Now it looks like heading for failure again.
 
:rofl: You failed again on your epic fail, just like your failed satellite failing again. Stupid Indians like you don't know what hit you. It's your face hitting the ground. You fell flat on your face.

On topic, Indian launch failed BBC News - India cryogenic satellite space launch fails. Indian launch failed again, kaboom in the sky, BBC News - India satellite rocket explodes after take-off. Now it looks like heading for failure again.

Nothing is hitting the Indians but same cannot be said about the chinese rockets .

Sometimes they come back and fall on top of chinese itself .

As for chinese failures ,

China Loses Experimental Satellite in Rocket Launch Failure | Rocket Launch Failures & Experimental Satellites | China Space Program | Space.com
 
The topic is - The latest satellite launch :D Today is 21st August, 2013

And the links you put up - lets see their dates

1. 25 December 2010 Last updated at 14:34 GMT
2. Page last updated at 13:21 GMT, Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:21 UK

Dates ^^ directly copied. Now hang yourself. :hang2:

:rofl: You failed again on your epic fail, just like your failed satellite failing again. Stupid Indians like you don't know what hit you. It's your face hitting the ground. You fell flat on your face.

On topic, Indian launch failed BBC News - India cryogenic satellite space launch fails. Indian launch failed again, kaboom in the sky, BBC News - India satellite rocket explodes after take-off. Now it looks like heading for failure again.
 
You seem to have lost your brains completely! Were you always like this or is this a recent phenomenon? This thread is about the aborted take-off of the GSLV a couple of days ago where the countdown was halted due to a suspected fuel leak in the rocket.

And you in your childish exuberance are pasting links of a failed satellite three years ago!!!!! :omghaha:

I've come across dumb-a$$es but you take the cake! You don't even know WTF you're talking about!

I think kids with half a brain cell should be banned on PDF.
 
The topic is - The latest satellite launch :D Today is 21st August, 2013

And the links you put up - lets see their dates

1. 25 December 2010 Last updated at 14:34 GMT
2. Page last updated at 13:21 GMT, Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:21 UK

Dates ^^ directly copied. Now hang yourself. :hang2:

You either failed miserably at basic reading comprehension or are very dense. I'll explain it to you like a stupid 5 year old.

BBC's article has the title - India puts off re-launch of failed satellite. "Puts off" means India is not doing it now, delaying it. What is "it"? It is the re-launch. Why is it called re-launch? Why not just call it India puts off the launch of a satellite? Because it really is a re-launch of previous satellites that failed to launch successfully. Thus it is a re-launch of failed satellite. So which failed satellite was it? It explains right in the article.

Quoting the article, "Two earlier attempts at lift-off three years ago had failed - in December 2010, the rocket disappeared in a plume of smoke moments after its launch.

The first attempt to launch it in April 2010 had also been unsuccessful."

The GSLV satellite failed twice before. Once in April 2010 and once in December 2010, which you just kept ignoring. If you even bothered to follow the link to the BBC article, you would see they provide links to the two previous failed launches as well. But I guess you are willfully stupid to ignore them.

The current re-launch of the failed satellite is being delayed again. That's what BBC is reporting.

You got that now, dumbarse? Now STFU and go back to play with your tin can.
 
You might be typing from your one room cell. Perhaps the medical orderlies forgot to administer the medicines to you. Pity. :undecided:
I hope they at least did not forget to keep the chains. I will only say one thing -
1. Regardless of what BBC reporter writes - the fact remains that the two satellites are different. So the question of 'relaunch' does not arise.
Different models of the GSLV Satellite has not only failed once before but many times. But point to note is - different models. But take your medicines, have some sleep. We can get back later. Till then cyao.
You either failed miserably at basic reading comprehension or are very dense. I'll explain it to you like a stupid 5 year old.

BBC's article has the title - India puts off re-launch of failed satellite. "Puts off" means India is not doing it now, delaying it. What is "it"? It is the re-launch. Why is it called re-launch? Why not just call it India puts off the launch of a satellite? Because it really is a re-launch of previous satellites that failed to launch successfully. Thus it is a re-launch of failed satellite. So which failed satellite was it? It explains right in the article.

Quoting the article, "Two earlier attempts at lift-off three years ago had failed - in December 2010, the rocket disappeared in a plume of smoke moments after its launch.

The first attempt to launch it in April 2010 had also been unsuccessful."

The GSLV satellite failed twice before. Once in April 2010 and once in December 2010, which you just kept ignoring. If you even bothered to follow the link to the BBC article, you would see they provide links to the two previous failed launches. But I guess you are willfully stupid to ignore them.

The current re-launch of the failed satellite is being delayed again. That's what BBC is reporting.

You got that now, dumbarse? Now STFU and go back to play with your tin can.
 
Back
Top Bottom