Peaceful Civilian
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2011
- Messages
- 12,098
- Reaction score
- 8
- Country
- Location
I know, I just post this to wind them up. They have super sensitive egos.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know, I just post this to wind them up. They have super sensitive egos.
Only mallu communists are pro China.Every one is hypocrite to suit their own need..so does USA...it was USA who has pampered Pakistan with arms and ammuniation in 1990 when Zia was president..At that time, Pakistan was golden boy for them...Now the situation has changed, so they are supporting India..
Point is, India will pursue its own interest irrespective of what US would like us to do...It is not India's interest not India is also capable of countering China...And to be honest, why should India even be fighting with China??? China is one of largest trading parter of India...
Indian people in general are not so anti China in nature...They are anti Pakistan to some extent, but in people to people level, we respect the rise of China and their culture in general.
Typical Pakistani delusional cheer leader. I know Pakistanis are obsessed with bollywood and experts like Zaed Hameed. I gave you the link supporting the statistics. Do some hardwork instead of cheer leading here for the Chinese and further look into the references. Keep your Pakistani fantasies with your self.listen you dingbat, first off, I could care less about your twisted bollywood history that 10000 "brave" soldiers fought against 80000 Chinese soldiers or however many soldiers; bottom line that you cannot deny is that your so called brave soldiers turned tail and ran like hell to save their own skins. And here's a crash course for you on 1971!
98000 who surrendered were actually mostly civilians and nonbengali west Pakistanis who were working on gov't positions and having private businesses. Pakistan's entire army in 1971 was 350000, more than half of whom were bengalis in east Pakistan who had rebelled. Leaving roughly 150000 troops to defend the west and east, 25000 of whom where actually sent to e. Pakistan to put down the civil war. Thousands of them were killed in east Pakistan fighting both the mukti bahini who themselves were mostly former Pakistan Army soldiers who had rebelled agains the state and the indian army that was standing behind the mukti bahini. So this 98000 were MOSTLY civilians, not soldiers as your media would like for you to believe. For us Pakistanis, especially the urdu speaking ones ME from karachi, this is common knowledge for us as many of us had family members lived in east Pakistan and were eventually taken as prisoners of war even though they had NOTHING to with the military. And yes, that includes my OWN relatives who had businesses in east Pakistan. So don't even bother trying sell me that load of rotten horse manure that you eat for breakfast that most of them were army soldiers because they were NOT! Most were civilians from west who got caught in the cross fire and were eventually taken prisoner by the indian army ONLY because they were loyal to Pakistan. So don't try to sell me that horse crap that 80000 were soldiers while 20000 were civilians because after the most of the bengali troops deserted in march of 1971, Pakistan just did not have those kinds of numbers left in the army to send over east Pakistan; the reality is the opposite and it also adds up; the maximum number of troops we could send over to east Pakistan dismal at best and dhaka was bound to fall with nothing to top it. To think that east Pakistan only had 10000 civilians from west Pakistan is ludicrous at best. But hats off to your crooked media twisting and pr; it managed to convince the world of the exact opposite. Having said all that, I for one don't support Pakistan in the 1971 war and am one of those ones who rightly say that Pakistan brought it upon itself by discriminating against the majority of the population that consisted of bengalis.
As for siachin, you have gathered far more losses than we ever had in that theatre with no end in side while, thanks to Kargil, we now, as we speak, occupy the highest peak in the area that over looks the only road that can be used to supply your troops in siachin; they are virtually sitting at our mercy. What you call as being sneaky, I call brilliant since you had basically exempted your entire fighting force in trying to retake numerous smaller peaks and finally gave up and cried uncle clinton when it became obvious that tiger hill cannot be taken back. And in spite of our crap prime minister folding in front of clinton's pressure, we still managed to keep that main peak. If your army had even one tenth of the bravery that you claim it does, you would have started an all out war to get that peak back. That peak is with us to this day routinely blocks your supplies going to siachin which causes even more indian troops die of extreme cold and starvation.
just try and take it back if you dare.
As for your missile test; yeah nothing new, it is the same missile that was tested earlier this year. this normal, they may have fixed a few problems and retested it. it is nothing even close to the entire b.s. hype that the indian media is making it to be. But none the less, it is China centric and will indo-China confrontation all the more interesting in the very near future.
Well keep motivating..is that why you have been continuously loosing territory to China?
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...China-Official-report/articleshow/5430564.cms
india hasn't even begun to master miniaturization of warheads while Pakistan is far ahead in the game. So good luck with that, you'll need it!
well the reactions don't matter to us because we have motivated the kashmiris enough to take the matters into their own hands. it is india that has been looking for india-favorable reaction from the world which unfortunately for india has not come forth.
What about Agni 6?
You shouldnt laugh at this, especially what after Japan did to China.
against China? Seriously?
So, lemme get this straight; CHINA...a nation that was once considered as a pariah rogue state that has been staring down the most powerful country in the world, the u.s., has beaten it to a pulp in both korea and vietnam, has beaten you to a pulp in the 1962 humiliation AND now controls virtually the entire global economy, and your plan is to...blackmail this nation?
Good luck!
just take a wild guess who is india in this clip!
Every one is hypocrite to suit their own need..so does USA...it was USA who has pampered Pakistan with arms and ammuniation in 1990 when Zia was president..At that time, Pakistan was golden boy for them...Now the situation has changed, so they are supporting India..
Point is, India will pursue its own interest irrespective of what US would like us to do...It is not India's interest not India is also capable of countering China...And to be honest, why should India even be fighting with China??? China is one of largest trading parter of India...
Indian people in general are not so anti China in nature...They are anti Pakistan to some extent, but in people to people level, we respect the rise of China and their culture in general.
Once we've covered China (which we had some time ago, hence my hauwwa comment ...), what reasoning do we give for missiles of progressively greater range?
Speaking of the elephant in the room. How do we explain a 12-15000 km missile to our new friends.
why would US worry about Indias military buildup? indîa is naturally a US ally..but we know îts complicated.only a naive country wouldnt track or watch Pakistans missile program.I'm a secular, capitalistic, socially conservative democrat and Muslim. I don't think that Islamists are gonna like me. I did not say anything against India's missile program per se. I rather simply wanted to point out that American politicians see a great threat in China's/Iran's/Pakistan's missile program but at the same time they're willingly welcome India's military buildup.
This is what I call hypocritical.
Why what for?? give me one benefit of it please...I think it can also reach many parts of Europe.
Excellent news. Indian missiles should cover the world.
Way to go DRDO!
What about Agni 6?
because they can throw a reason at you...they are a super power and they need such toys to protect their interests all over the world....also while they were developing such things we were incapable of even dreaming about such toys...we have no reason whatsoever to cover anything beyond china...within that range no body is going to complain...They never explained to us, why should we explain it to anyone?
Anyways, India has no first use.
India - Vietnam economic corridor coming up?
Why what for?? give me one benefit of it please...