What's new

India partition better or worse for Muslims?

August the 14th 1947 was good for us. It ensured that the Pakistani people gained a safe space to preserve our unique beautiful race, culture, heritage and way of life. Away from our enemies who wish us genocide and oppression. We are FREE practice our religion and way of life without persecution, genocide or oppression.........8-)
 
.
August the 14th 1947 was good for us. It ensured that the Pakistani people gained a safe space to preserve our unique race, culture, heritage and way of life. Away from our enemies who wish us genocide and oppression. We are FREE practice our religion and way of life without persecution, genocide or oppression.........8-)

That is just your openion. Show us an irrifutable proof.
 
.
There were two partitions. 47 and 71.
Since BD is much better now in economic terms, its safe to assume 47 was useless.






May have been useless for indians but supremely beneficial for Pakistanis. It ensured we preserved our unique, beautiful race and were not being ruled and genocided by the world's most ugliest and physically repulsive sub-human race.
 
.
May have been useless for indians but supremely beneficial for Pakistanis. It ensured we preserved our unique, beautiful race and were not being ruled and genocided by the world's most ugliest and physically repulsive sub-human race.

Again an openion. Show us proof.
 
. . .
The proof is I am not an indian. So I am FAR FAR more likely to be telling the truth as indians simply..........:lol::

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/world-asia-india-50749764

It seems you have problems with english language. Beta join some good language class. The link you shared says nothing about how partition was good or bad for India n Pakistan

This is the proof which says Partition helped india nit pakistan.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/629/629/6922293.stm

India, Pakistan and Bangladesh have come a long way since the British left them. Of the three nations, India has seen by far the most dramatic growth.

In terms of economic resources, India did much better than Pakistan out of partition. It inherited 90% of the subcontinent's industry and the thriving cities of Delhi, Bombay (now Mumbai) and Calcutta.

It is now one of the world's fastest developing economies with average growth rates of 8% over the past three years. It is also emerging as a serious global player in information technology, telecommunications and pharmaceuticals
 
.
Partition was the right call at the right time, but it wasn't perfect as we weren't given several Bengali Muslim majority districts - North Dinajpur, Malda, Murshidabad, Nadia, Karimganj, Hailakandi. How could Muslim leaders let these districts go so easily? :hitwall:
main-qimg-954f4cc415c97150b27d267a2a2663fc-c
 
.
It seems you have problems with english language. Beta join some good language class. The link you shared says nothing about how partition was good or bad for India n Pakistan

This is the proof which says Partition helped india nit pakistan.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/629/629/6922293.stm

India, Pakistan and Bangladesh have come a long way since the British left them. Of the three nations, India has seen by far the most dramatic growth.

In terms of economic resources, India did much better than Pakistan out of partition. It inherited 90% of the subcontinent's industry and the thriving cities of Delhi, Bombay (now Mumbai) and Calcutta.

It is now one of the world's fastest developing economies with average growth rates of 8% over the past three years. It is also emerging as a serious global player in information technology, telecommunications and pharmaceuticals





What has indian done since partition? Little weiner boy, india is still a backward, third world nation. Since 1947, ONLY China has gone on to become a SUPERPOWER on the way to becoming a HYPER POWER. Wheras india is one of the most impoverished nations in the world:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/world-asia-india-50749764

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/world-asia-india-50749764

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wo...591/India-accused-of-poverty-smokescreen.html

https://m.timesofindia.com/india/India-has-40-of-worlds-malnourished-Expert/articleshow/20840897.cms

https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/half-world-s-poor-live-just-5-countries


In terms of science and technology. india has done NOTHING. All it does is just buy the sciences and technologies from the White nations. Other than that, india is at the SAME level as Sub-saharan African nations in terms of science and technology. That is why 1.4 billion indians HAVE NEVER EVER invented ANY Advanced Sciences or Technologies throughout the ENTIRE history of mankind. The racial IQ of the indian race is too low to ever be successful in science or technology:

https://new-iq-test.com/iq-by-country/

The ONLY economic success india has had is because of having a population of over 1.4 billion. Nothing more.
 
.
What has indian done since partition? Little weiner boy, india is still a backward, third world nation. Since 1947, ONLY China has gone on to become a SUPERPOWER on the way to becoming a HYPER POWER. Wheras india is one of the most impoverished nations in the world:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/world-asia-india-50749764

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/world-asia-india-50749764

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wo...591/India-accused-of-poverty-smokescreen.html

https://m.timesofindia.com/india/India-has-40-of-worlds-malnourished-Expert/articleshow/20840897.cms

https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/half-world-s-poor-live-just-5-countries


In terms of science and technology. india has done NOTHING. All it does is just buy the sciences and technologies from the White nations. Other than that, india is at the SAME level as Sub-saharan African nations in terms of science and technology. That is why 1.4 billion indians HAVE NEVER EVER invented ANY Advanced Sciences or Technologies throughout the ENTIRE history of mankind. The racial IQ of the indian race is too low to ever be successful in science or technology:

https://new-iq-test.com/iq-by-country/

The ONLY economic success india has had is because of having a population of over 1.4 billion. Nothing more.

Offtopic. I can literally thrash every single wird of yours. Just open a new thread and I,ll show u the mirror.

If population was a benchmark why and how south korea, Israel and BD are better than Pakistan ? If Land area is responsible why is Russia lagging behind India. As I said, it needs a new topic.

Till then stick to the topic.
 
.
Muslim population of the india was near 30% at the time of partition in 1947 but the partition was right decision with the logic that strong Pakistan will protect Indian Muslims. Pakistan was doing great before the 1965 war which not only slow Pakistan economic development but at the same time USA stopped technology transfer to Pakistan.
Instead of 1965, If Pakistan could had wait for another 20-25 years or avoid that useless war, the things could have been different for entire Muslims of the Sub continent
Blame Pakistan’s military dictatorship for very problem it faces/ faced. Including loosing bengal
 
.
Offtopic. I can literally thrash every single wird of yours. Just open a new thread and I,ll show u the mirror.

If population was a benchmark why and how south korea, Israel and BD are better than Pakistan ? If Land area is responsible why is Russia lagging behind India. As I said, it needs a new topic.

Till then stick to the topic.





They're ALSO better than india despite having populations less than 50-100× less than india.............:azn:...........look at the standard of living of the average Israeli, South Korean and Russian and then compare it to the average standard of living of an indian?..........:azn:

Now, WHAT advanced sciences and technologies have 1.4 billion indians EVER invented like the White and Far Eastern races have?.........:azn:........buying advanced sciences and technologies from the White races does not mean anything because of it did then the whole of Africa, South America and the Middle East is decades more scientifically and technologically advanced than india.


PS Russia lagging behind india???????..........WTF????????.............:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:...........little weiner boy, Russia's population is more than 10× less than india's yet the average Russian has a living standard that is at least 7x greater than that of an indian..........:lol:.........Russia is so behind india which explains why india spends 100s of billions of dollars buying defence equipment and other advanced sciences and technologies from Russia.........:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:.........you obviously believe that india has been a superpower since 1965.........:rofl::rofl:
 
.
They're ALSO better than india despite having populations less than 50-100× less than india.............:azn:...........look at the standard of living of the average Israeli, South Korean and Russian and then compare it to the average standard of living of an indian?..........:azn:

Now, WHAT advanced sciences and technologies have 1.4 billion indians EVER invented like the White and Far Eastern races have?.........:azn:........buying advanced sciences and technologies from the White races does not mean anything because of it did then the whole of Africa, South America and the Middle East is decades more scientifically and technologically advanced than india.


PS Russia lagging behind india???????..........WTF????????.............:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:...........little weiner boy, Russia's population is more than 10× less than india's yet the average Russian has a living standard that is at least 7x greater than that of an indian..........:lol:.........Russia is so behind india which explains why india spends 100s of billions of dollars buying defence equipment and other advanced sciences and technologies from Russia.........:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:.........you obviously believe that india has been a superpower since 1965.........:rofl::rofl:
If u want answers, Open a new thread. And yes Russian Economy is worse.

I didnt talk abt living standards though. Economy and Living standards are two different things.

I will answer, and bust your lies and misconception ONLY in a new thread as its offtopic here.
 
.
Contrary to the popular interpretation of two nation theory my view of two nation theory is not religious but dating back to indus valley civilization which is indigenous to pakistanis.

Historically the region pakistan and most of the north western india bordering pakistan is linked to one indus valley civilization.

Formation of Pakistan was inevitable as Pakistan is the true successor state of indus valley civilization.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom