What's new

'India-Pak cricket unlikely until closure of 26/11 case'

Oh bhai,

KKK would lash on ALL blacks even if one black did something wrong.

Indian Hindutvadi crowd lashes on ALL Pakistanis even if one Pakistani commits a crime.

Hope you get it now.

p.s.

In the similar vein White supremacists have done some horrible attacks on American-Sikhs even if those poor guys have nothing to do with Turbaned Islamists.

but you didn't tell us , how we are looting you or punishing you ?
 
. . . .
Thats absurd, what the cricket hell to do with 26/11. Definitely we should play matches on neutral venue, maybe at Dubai, and India need to respect the ICC contracts.
 
.
OK.

if you don't get it. then read @scorpionx post.

oh bhai, i'm not mixing religion with game or with politics. but one needs to understand that cricket is not just a game as far as India is concerned and how does it make sense when there is intense firing at LOC and your army is in hand & gloves with terrorists against India.
 
.
oh bhai, i'm not mixing religion with game or with politics. but one needs to understand that cricket is not just a game as far as India is concerned and how does it make sense when there is intense firing at LOC and your army is in hand & gloves with terrorists against India.

Here we go again.

$hit shoveling India-Pak style.

Carry on Sir. Carry on your business.
 
.
obviously, you got your analogy completely wrong.

The point is (@FaujHistorian sir will correct me if I am wrong), the assumption that being a Pakistani automatically implies his/her support for any terrorist attack in India is utterly baseless; Especially when we Indians conveniently forgot that Malalas are being shot or Aitaz Hassans are sacrificing their lives too in their quest to protect the spirit of liberalism and humanity. We should not generalize an entire nation for the few handful of bigots.
 
.
Here we go again.

$hit shoveling India-Pak style.

Carry on Sir. Carry on your business.

that are serious issues, for which we concern a lot.

The point is, the assumption that being a Pakistani automatically implies his/her support for any terrorist attack in India is utterly baseless. Especially when we Indians conveniently forgot that Malalas are being shot or Aitaz Hassans are sacrificing their lives too in their quest to protect the spirit of liberalism and humanity. We should not generalize an entire nation for the few handful of bigots.

you are saying that pakistan's establishment is not involve in terrorism inside India ? don't fall in the trap of non state actor. ISI stills control LET and JUD and other terrorist organisations which are involved in terrorism inside India. let them take action against them. there is not a single positive signal from pakistan even on trade front. i'm not having any grudge against any common pakistani. there is a state sponsored terrorism against India.
 
.
that are serious issues, for which we concern a lot.



you are saying that pakistan's establishment is not involve in terrorism inside India ? don't fall in the trap of non state actor. ISI stills control LET and JUD and other terrorist organisations which are involved in terrorism inside India. let them take action against them. there is not a single positive signal from pakistan even on trade front. i'm not having any grudge against any common pakistani. there is a state sponsored terrorism against India.
Nitin, if we do not have any grudge against common Pakistanis (ie ordinary civilians) then there is no reason to ban a complete harmless sport. Banning cricket is just a symbolic gesture with no practical effect on the relation between the two countries; Business has not stopped, neither diplomatic talks or cultural exchange. Then why just cricket?
 
.
Old timers' and $tupid thread.

Lahore Lions are playing in India right now.

Hope to see some professional teams from India visit us soon.

enough with this BS

Indians must realize that they should not treat Pakistanis as KKK whites treat blacks in America

One black criminal does some horrible thing
KKK goes around looting and burning middle class educated black homes.

Don't be a KKK.

OK?



please no mixing of hindtuva extremism with damned cricket.


Thank you.

i dont want my tem to play with pakistan

Thankyou
 
.
that are serious issues, for which we concern a lot.



you are saying that pakistan's establishment is not involve in terrorism inside India ? don't fall in the trap of non state actor. ISI stills control LET and JUD and other terrorist organisations which are involved in terrorism inside India. let them take action against them. there is not a single positive signal from pakistan even on trade front. i'm not having any grudge against any common pakistani. there is a state sponsored terrorism against India.
Dont fall in trap of hallucination even, the ISI is now become a mother god in Pak, there was a state policy of jihad in Pak, but the Mussy closed that tap in 2003.

But because of 2 decades of radicalization, cant be closed in one day, even now Pak is facing a backlash of that policy. There is no state sponsored terrorism now, but yes there are still some radicalized component in ISI that supporting this movement to bleed India.

@FaujHistorian will tell you the history more correctly.
 
. .
Nitin, if we do not have any grudge against common Pakistanis (ie ordinary civilians) then there is no reason to ban a complete harmless sport. Banning cricket is just a symbolic gesture with no practical effect on the relation between the two countries; Business has not stopped, neither diplomatic talks or cultural exchange. Then why just cricket?

there have been breakdown in diplomatic and business relations with pakistan. indian blood is not cheap. the thing is cricket is not just a game in India, it has lot of emotional value for us. why we are so eager to have cricketing ties with pakistan when their govt sponsor terrorism inside India? let take them action against 26/11 conspirators and dawood.

Dont fall in trap of hallucination even, the ISI is now become a mother god in Pak, there was a state policy of jihad in Pak, but the Mussy closed that tap in 2003.

But because of 2 decades of radicalization, cant be closed in one day, even now Pak is facing a backlash of that policy. There is no state sponsored terrorism now, but yes there are still some radicalized component in ISI that supporting this movement to bleed India.

@FaujHistorian will tell you the history more correctly.

woow.. what a innocent kid !!

have you forgotten what kind of cease fire violations we had recently ?
 
.
there have been breakdown in diplomatic and business relations with pakistan. indian blood is not cheap. the thing is cricket is not just a game in India, it has lot of emotional value for us. why we are so eager to have cricketing ties with pakistan when their govt sponsor terrorism inside India? let take them action against 26/11 conspirators and dawood.
If there had been a break down in diplomatic relations we won't have seen Mr.Sharif visiting Mr.Modi's inaugural ceremony.And no, trade links have not been stranded; Not even in both the parts of Kashmir.

No body is saying is any blood is cheap but the point is banning cricket (that too run by a top to bottom corrupt body controlling the "emotions" of billions of people) for no plausible reason is useless. We can choose to be emotional but that is not making us rational here.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom