India No longer a big threat to Pakistan :Ex ISI Chief

[Tornado23]

Well, you see. It is now an utterly useless discussion, which is unnecessarily instigated by certain Indians. The fact is that no one, in the whole world, except for certain "Phuddu" Indians, believe that in Balakot strike, any building, whatsoever, was severly damaged, or any body, whether so called millitant or other, was killed. All what happend was that a few trees fell, a crow died, few cracks in nearby houses, and a person got slightly injured. There was no need for Pakistan to go for providing any proofs, except what they diid.

True.

Then again, this is vkdindian. Someone who thinks india won the kargil war somehow

 

[White and Green with M/S]

As per Indian claim there were no children at that site.

LOL so why you're are claiming of 300 deadbody of what??

Being a peaceful country India was, is and never will be a threat for any country in the world..... what is new in this????

LOL you're biggest threat/mess for the peace of Subcontinent LOL

JAY TERRORIST HIND

 

[White and Green with M/S]

No. No one was taken to the buildings.
Media was taken to the place where Indian bombs fell as per the Pakistani claim.

I am not saying when the situation was hot. Media could have been taken after few days. And that is definitely less than 43.

Very next day BBC correspondence visit ground zero with no army guide LOL, world buys our narratives not yours within hours of your claim of you killed 300 terrorists international satellite expert claimed you miss the target , so do tell me these international satellite experts were lying?? Ànd if there was no Target destroyed so PA what to do to guide Media to ground zero??, Ànd why PA would like like to guide to the target if Target was still intact???

Yes. Some people were taken to the signboard of the building at the main road but not the building itself. What prevented them from allowing people at the building itself? What was such a secret about it? It was a seminary after all where there were scores of children being educated and it was complete intact as per Pakistani claims.
Few other pictures posted in these news articles appear to be of bomb craters.

Could you or anyone post any article in which they were allowed to visit the building itself?

LOL why would we if Target was still intact according to global satellites experts

 

[VkdIndian]

Dude very next day BBC correspondence visit ground zero and find you missed the targets by few hundred meters,

Please give the link so that it can be verified. As per what is available peop,e we’re allowed till the signboard.

300 kids

Kids were as per your narrative. As per India building has terrorists. Our Air Chief made it very clear that they don’t count bodies and that they hit the buildings.

can we hide machinery to clear the rubbles if target was destroyed?

Yes. That could be the reason that people were not allowed at the site. Otherwise they would have seen the equipment clearing the damage.

LOL why would we if Target was still intact according to global satellites experts

Then why did you after 43 days?

 

[White and Green with M/S]

Hmmmmm
For how long? 43 days?

Can we able to hide machinery to clear the rubbles of your claimed target?

 

[VkdIndian]

Can we able to hide machinery to clear the rubbles of your claimed target?

The weapons used were to cause minimum collateral damage. They were penetrators with minimal explosives so as to only kill. That’s why there was not much damage as seen from above. That worked out for you since heavy machinery was not required. You just needed time to do the repairs. The claim of no damage hence no visit required turned into visit required after 43 days.

 

[DJ_Viper]

India no longer a big threat to Pakistan: ex-ISI chief | The Express Tribune

Lt Gen (retd) Asad Durrani says Delhi caught up in self-created mess

tribune.com.pk

He's right. The no war pact and country to country level agreement with Pakistan's powerful military's involvement has settled the issue of Kashmir once and for all. The borders will remain as-is, end of the story and hostility for 70 years on both sides. Thanks to Trump I guess.

 

[White and Green with M/S]

Please give the link so that it can be verified. As per what is available peop,e we’re allowed till the signboard.

I am not trying to spoon feed you, these links is posted several time on this forum in different thread, google is your friend dude

Kids were as per your narrative. As per India building has terrorists. Our Air Chief made it very clear that they don’t count bodies and that they hit the buildings.

So your ACM claiming 300 if IAF didn't count bodies LOL

Yes. That could be the reason that people were not allowed at the site. Otherwise they would have seen the equipment clearing the damage.

LOL, i am not saying ON THE SITE but on the way to target, can we hide the heavy Machinery to the city of Balakot and near villages from the target??

Then why did you after 43 days?

Ask yourself sincerely if target was destroyed, can we hide heavy Machinery moving to the target, and if you claiming the 300 terrorists, then where is their families and why they were not complaining lol

 

[SIPRA]

True.

Then again, this is vkdindian. Someone who thinks india won the kargil war somehow

Yes. But it is the mistake of Pakistani posters to enter into some serious discussion on such a ridiculous topic. It is all settled already. Nobody in the world believes in what India claimed.

 

[White and Green with M/S]

The weapons used were to cause minimum collateral damage. They were penetrators with minimal explosives so as to only kill. That’s why there was not much damage as seen from above. That worked out for you since heavy machinery was not required. You just needed time to do the repairs. The claim of no damage hence no visit required turned into visit required after 43 days.

Lol another nonsense to your wishful dream, i can show you lots of YouTube Videos that penetrator hit the target it deformed the structure, you provided 2 pics of the target with 2 holes as a proof, target didn't seemed to be deformed, if you claiming the damage is light so where is the repair workers (labors) comes from?? and why we need 43 days to repair such a light damage, think logically dude

 

[ghazi52]

India will always be a threat, that is a ground reality..

 

[SIPRA]

India will always be a threat, that is a ground reality..

Yes, and we should always be ready to screw them.

 

[RangeMaster]

The weapons used were to cause minimum collateral damage. They were penetrators with minimal explosives so as to only kill. That’s why there was not much damage as seen from above. That worked out for you since heavy machinery was not required. You just needed time to do the repairs. The claim of no damage hence no visit required turned into visit required after 43 days.

Yes not much damage from the above but 300 kills. Bomb penetrated the roof and then it started flying left destroying all the rooms and killing students there then it took 180° turn and killed all the students sleeping in the right wing. Then no funerals, no prayers for the dead nothing, dead bodies just evaporated.
Where the f you get these numbers from... 300, 400, 1000. Can't you make a more realistic looking number like 23 or 15. Same happened with LAC standoff where 50 Chinese casualties turned into 20 Indian.

 

[VkdIndian]

I am not trying to spoon feed you, these links is posted several time on this forum in different thread, google is your friend dude

There was no visit to ground zero by anyone. All that is available is pictures fo the signboard and few craters. None whatsoever of that building.

So your ACM claiming 300 if IAF didn't count bodies LOL

He categorically said that IAF doesn’t count bodies. We only engage a assigned target. Yes, this claim was made by few other people but no the ACM.

Ask yourself sincerely if target was destroyed, can we hide heavy Machinery moving to the target, and if you claiming the 300 terrorists, then where is their families and why they were not complaining lol

I have no idea about the number of deaths.

I also agree that proof provided by India is inadequate.

My sole contention is that Pakistan was in a better position to call a bluff to Indian claim by allowing a quick visit by the media.

Where the f you get these numbers from... 300, 400, 1000.

I haven’t quoted any figure. I was only disputing the type of inhabitants while quoting the numbers. Hence, you would need to take your query to those who made the claim.

Lol another nonsense to your wishful dream, i can show you lots of YouTube Videos that penetrator hit the target it deformed the structure,

Ok. If it was a lie by India, why not expose it? Why ask for or quote satellite pictures when a ground visit could have been facilitated to puncture all Indian claims?

 

[Tornado23]

There was no visit to ground zero by anyone. All that is available is pictures fo the signboard and few craters. None whatsoever of that building.

He categorically said that IAF doesn’t count bodies. We only engage a assigned target. Yes, this claim was made by few other people but no the ACM.




I have no idea about the number of deaths.

I also agree that proof provided by India is inadequate.

My sole contention is that Pakistan was in a better position to call a bluff to Indian claim by allowing a quick visit by the media.

I haven’t quoted any figure. I was only disputing the type of inhabitants while quoting the numbers. Hence, you would need to take your query to those who made the claim.

You are contradicting yourself now. You were adamant that india hit the target and pakistan hid something. Now you say you also agree india didnt provide evidence and that you were saying pakistan had the chance to call out the indian bluff? Piss off m8