What's new

India Needs to Join Asia's Emerging 'Chinese Order'

Historically there's no 'India' as a country before 1947. India was just the name of this land, not the name of any country. The great ancient India kindom only existed thousands of years ago. Since the invasion of Aryan, this land has been ruled by various outsiders. They founded different countries but none is the real india. 'India' was just a similar geographic definition as 'mid asia' or 'far east'. Except the great ancient india, unlike China, this land is never united as a single nation before 1947. 'India' as a country is created by British and Gandhi. Why do you consider Pakistan and Nepal should be part of your country?

What you posted is a historical fact. No sane Indian would disagree with you.
 
Historically there's no 'India' as a country before 1947. India was just the name of this land, not the name of any country. The great ancient India kindom only existed thousands of years ago. Since the invasion of Aryan, this land has been ruled by various outsiders. They founded different countries but none is the real india. 'India' was just a similar geographic definition as 'mid asia' or 'far east'. Except the great ancient india, unlike China, this land is never united as a single nation before 1947. 'India' as a country is created by British and Gandhi. Why do you consider Pakistan and Nepal should be part of your country?

Indian identity existed centuries before your Qin Shi Huang was even born. Moreover, no united China existed until 1950 when Mao Zedong united all of China under single government, even ROC never controlled a united China. ;)
 
Indian identity existed centuries before your Qin Shi Huang was even born. Moreover, no united China existed until 1950 when Mao Zedong united all of China under single government, even ROC never controlled a united China. ;)

Indian identity or Dravidian identity?
 
Why are you guys so confrontational anyway? There are no historic rivalries other than some piffling border wars over some mountain passes. Is it a race thing?

The main reason is Chinese obsession with so called historical Chinese land which they never owned historically. ;)
 
Bharat/India/Hindustan since eternity. Take it. It didn't came in 1930s.

Bharat is a fake concept invented in early 1900's and materialized in 1947.
India is another concept that materialized in 1947.
Hindustan was born when Muslims ruled over the land...

See.. You guys have no identity.
 
Bharat is a fake concept invented in early 1900's and materialized in 1947.
India is another concept that materialized in 1947.
Hindustan was born when Muslims ruled over the land...

See.. You guys have no identity.

Please I am not interested in your Sarkari taleem. :laughcry:
 
Bharat is a fake concept invented in early 1900's and materialized in 1947.
India is another concept that materialized in 1947.
Hindustan was born when Muslims ruled over the land...

See.. You guys have no identity.


Rather Pakistan is a fake concept that was materialized on August 14, 1947 and died on September 11, 1948.
 
Historically there's no 'India' as a country before 1947. India was just the name of this land, not the name of any country. The great ancient India kindom only existed thousands of years ago. Since the invasion of Aryan, this land has been ruled by various outsiders. They founded different countries but none is the real india. 'India' was just a similar geographic definition as 'mid asia' or 'far east'. Except the great ancient india, unlike China, this land is never united as a single nation before 1947. 'India' as a country is created by British and Gandhi. Why do you consider Pakistan and Nepal should be part of your country?
Unlike China India was unified for the first time under the Maurya Empire in the 3rd century BC
China was unified for the first time by Mao in the 20th century by slaughtering a lot of Chinese.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom