Sanchez, why would China protect Lashkar-e-Taiba
I don't think China would protect Lashkar-e-Taiba.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sanchez, why would China protect Lashkar-e-Taiba
Why are you guys so confrontational anyway? There are no historic rivalries other than some piffling border wars over some mountain passes. Is it a race thing?
A very weak argument, considering Sub continent is a Dharmic land and the practices are originated here.
Bhuddha was born is Nepal or India is not clear, But his enlightenment happened in Bihar Bodgaya. His teachings were started here. Before Buddhism Indian sages used to do the same and also taught similar principles.
But Buddha made them popular.
How can we give up budhha...budhha is considered as eighth incarnation of Lord Vishnu (Hindu god)
Dashavatara - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In this forum, yes. In real life, I don't think there's much hostility, though Indian media and politicians love to portray China as some sort of an enemy.
Nepal is also part of the Sub cont. Arguing Buddha is Indian because he gained enlightenment and taught in India is as valid as saying Gandhi is British because he was educated in Britain and worked in S. Africa. There's no dispute, Buddha was born in Lumbini, Nepal.
That's an oxymoronic claim made by Brahmin to gain popularity for Hinduism. Buddha was strongly against
Brahmins' Hinduism and the caste system, that was why he started Buddhism. After his death, Brahmins made Buddha part of their religion lol.
I will ignore the last 2 parts & answer for the 1st one only
Yes there is a precept ion here that chins is a threat which is true to some extent but that will change once trade improves
Think of it we don't have any historical baggage & sky will the limit Sino-Indian relations
Historically Nepal n India are one nation..i mean like before 1947 pakistan was also part of greater india....Gout am budhha was born, lived and died as a Hindu.In this forum, yes. In real life, I don't think there's much hostility, though Indian media and politicians love to portray China as some sort of an enemy.
Nepal is also part of the Sub cont. Arguing Buddha is Indian because he gained enlightenment and taught in India is as valid as saying Gandhi is British because he was educated in Britain and worked in S. Africa. There's no dispute, Buddha was born in Lumbini, Nepal.
That's an oxymoronic claim made by Brahmin to gain popularity for Hinduism. Buddha was strongly against
Brahmins' Hinduism and the caste system, that was why he started Buddhism in the first place.
Histo
Historically Nepal n India are one nation..i mean like before 1947 pakistan was also part of greater india....Gout am budhha was born, lived and died as a Hindu.
Of course.. We never listened threat of US during 1971 war or during N bomb testing. We never took side of USSR during cold war. You may laugh your a$$ out but it is only Pakistan who takes order from US earlier (and still is) and now China's.ohhh REALLY??
Nepal is also part of the Sub cont. Arguing Buddha is Indian because he gained enlightenment and taught in India is as valid as saying Gandhi is British because he was educated in Britain and worked in S. Africa. There's no dispute, Buddha was born in Lumbini, Nepal.
Most scholars regard Kapilavastu, present-day Nepal, to be the birthplace of the Buddha.[4][16][note 9][note 10] Other possibilities are Lumbini, present-day Nepal;[37][note 11] Kapileswara, Odisha, present-day India; [note 12] and Piprahwa, Uttar Pradesh, present-day India
From Wiki.
Secondly Gandhi is not famous as Barrister he is famous for his non violent movement , which is done in India. Wrong analogy.
Wikipedia? Try UNESCO.
I'll make it simpler, the point is, nationality is determined by country of birth, not where you go or what you did.
Lumbini was independent kingdom not a state of nepal or india then...bcoz the term nepal or india are not there in 600 bc....Wikipedia? Try UNESCO.
I'll make it simpler, the point is, nationality is determined by country of birth, not where or what you did.
you have no idea or the difference between civilizational state and nationality.
T
Lumbini was independent kingdom not a state of nepal or india then...bcoz the term nepal or india are not there in 600 bc....