What's new

India may plan airstrikes in Muridkay

I am glad we can agree on something.Again I see the picture and the motives differently, However, we are moving away from the main topic even though, i chose not to dwell into idiocy. I will simply bow out.
Regards
A

On topic, I can state that this situation is being over-hyped for internal audiences on both sides and will not be allowed to escalate on the the ground.
 
. . .
Okay, so there are 12.5 million people in J&K. So 8*12.5 = 100 million soldiers.

You see the flaw in your argument?



We didn't start anything. You guys committed genocide in BD and then went full mullah after you lost.
You guys committed genocide in kashmit and we thus supported kashmirs same way you guys supported Bengali's whats the differences ?

And where is india now..why arent you invading burma?? I meant that genocide is accepted by UN. Why are you guys doing nothing ?
What about genocide in africa and Afghanistan send your troops there..what about yemen why not there??

Can't be helped. The choice was between doing what they did or mowing down a whole bunch of people. The people to blame are the stone pelters obviously.



This is a narrative that Pakistan wants to push. But it's detrimental to Indian interests if India starts operating in Afghanistan. Pakistan will then try to garner sympathy from the international community with the excuse that India is encircling Pakistan. This is the main reason why we have only provided political and financial support to the Afghans rather than military support. India has no military presence in Afghanistan nor has any plans to sending troops there.

Another major reason is Pakistan can play the victim card among the Taliban and other warlords and have them unite against this 'Indian threat' in Afghanistan. But if we do not have a presence there at all, then there is no question of playing the victim card.

Militarily India has no need to open another front there. Afghans and Iranians can create enough headache for Pakistan without our direct help.
Iranians lol..Afghans ? Even our FC is more equipped than ANA Which on verge of collapse what are you talking about..

FC(paramilitary) has more gunships and tanks than the whole ANA
 
. .
Initially 4 targets been visualised by indian army and airforce 2 of them in azad kashmir and 2 pakistani punjab , muridkey and kartarpur
While targets in azad kashmir still sorted out by indian army ?
Targets in azad kashmir will be soften up by air raids then soilders would jumped in for a limited time special israeli instructor hve been called in for commando rehearsals on the targets on azad kashmir while pak punjab targets would taken by indian airforce both actions will take at same time thts whts been under consideration right now but indian army chief isnt sure about what kind of response pakarmy would be taking after tht ?
Cause wht indian army chief is afraid of is the use of tactical weaponry by pakarmy on very limited scale and going in the occupied jummu and kashmir and cutting it from india until , india respond with nuclear attacks on rest of pakistan?
All this can be stopped by just putting a bullet in the head of modi jee , I gss
More innocent ppls who are already in indian armys custudy would be killed in fake encounters
While kashmiri youth and students been targeted all over india
Is this a satirical post or are you for real?
The moment Indian Aircraft enter Pakistani Airspace and start SOFTENING the targets. What do you suppose Pakistan will do? wait for Indian Land Forces to come and drop para troopers? :close_tema:
And Do you even know the location of Muridke? They will just fly right beside Lahore Cantonement and Gujranwala Cantonment and Will fly back home as simple as that? Or will they dare use Standoff Weapons and Expect no Retaliation? You know very well Pakistani Capabilities of Standoff weapons to hit inside India Right?
 
.
Stone pelters, attacking the army etc, not safe.

"The only ones getting killed are the ones attacking the security forces, which is perfectly fine."


bingo..

and this why your security forces also getting killed. bcos you are killing

simple logic seems to defy indians

Former Supreme Court Justice (of India) Markandey Katju

Check Timecode: 2:38



a sensible india... very rare in a nation where 90% idiots
 
.
After Dassault, another company is trying to exploit the Indians,just renamed the F-16 Block 60/70 as F-21:disagree:

US learned this tactic from Russia who changed names of fighter jet if an upgraded version is developed for example Mig-29 became Mig-35 and same goes for Sukhoi Su-27 series.

Can't be helped. The choice was between doing what they did or mowing down a whole bunch of people. The people to blame are the stone pelters obviously.



This is a narrative that Pakistan wants to push. But it's detrimental to Indian interests if India starts operating in Afghanistan. Pakistan will then try to garner sympathy from the international community with the excuse that India is encircling Pakistan. This is the main reason why we have only provided political and financial support to the Afghans rather than military support. India has no military presence in Afghanistan nor has any plans to sending troops there.

Another major reason is Pakistan can play the victim card among the Taliban and other warlords and have them unite against this 'Indian threat' in Afghanistan. But if we do not have a presence there at all, then there is no question of playing the victim card.

Militarily India has no need to open another front there. Afghans and Iranians can create enough headache for Pakistan without our direct help.

After MBS visit Iranians are in no position to do anything stupid against Pakistan, because if they do, they will gift golden opportunity to KSA, US and Israel alliance against Iran, also backdoor connections are there between Pakistan and Israel.

Can't be helped. The choice was between doing what they did or mowing down a whole bunch of people. The people to blame are the stone pelters obviously.



This is a narrative that Pakistan wants to push. But it's detrimental to Indian interests if India starts operating in Afghanistan. Pakistan will then try to garner sympathy from the international community with the excuse that India is encircling Pakistan. This is the main reason why we have only provided political and financial support to the Afghans rather than military support. India has no military presence in Afghanistan nor has any plans to sending troops there.

Another major reason is Pakistan can play the victim card among the Taliban and other warlords and have them unite against this 'Indian threat' in Afghanistan. But if we do not have a presence there at all, then there is no question of playing the victim card.

Militarily India has no need to open another front there. Afghans and Iranians can create enough headache for Pakistan without our direct help.

After MBS visit Iranians are in no position to do anything stupid against Pakistan, because if they do, they will gift golden opportunity to KSA, US and Israel alliance against Iran, also backdoor connections are there between Pakistan and Israel.
 
.
bingo..

and this why your security forces also getting killed. bcos you are killing

simple logic seems to defy indians

:lol: The stone pelters have no relation to the terrorists coming in from across the border, bringing in AK-47s.

After MBS visit Iranians are in no position to do anything stupid against Pakistan, because if they do, they will gift golden opportunity to KSA, US and Israel alliance against Iran, also backdoor connections are there between Pakistan and Israel.

Iran can still create trouble for Pakistan.

Remember Qatar? Qatar would rather defy the GCC than Iran.
 
.
You guys committed genocide in kashmit and we thus supported kashmirs same way you guys supported Bengali's whats the differences ?
bro, they is full of crap. They don't like analogies that go against their interest? Did u think they were interested in Justice? lol.
The world know what they did and this why they don't get the real and full support that they seek. He who seeks justice must have done justice himself. Ots a legal maxim that I recall from studying Jurisprudence is law school.
 
. .
Former Supreme Court Justice (of India) Markandey Katju

Check Timecode: 2:38

Talked a lot of sense. Rather spoilt it at the end with his reunification theory. Surely he doesn't believe that rubbish.
 
.
:lol: The stone pelters have no relation to the terrorists coming in from across the border, bringing in AK-47s.



Iran can still create trouble for Pakistan.

Remember Qatar? Qatar would rather defy the GCC than Iran.

They can but they also know the consequences too, Pakistan can return favor to them.
 
. . .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom