I've been going through those links (in between all the trolling
). Well, I agree with the sentiments but I'm not sure about how you people plan to actually ensure governance. And transparency. And ensure no abuse of power takes place. I.E checks and balances especially if the whole world actually 'converts' to this structure and their are no external powers like UNHRC.
good points you make.
technically, the jamahiriya direct-democracy is built on transparency... referring (
The Green Book - I )...
1. every decision and recommendation done at local community/commune level ( basic people's congress ) is done vocally ( within some hall or on a ground ) by raising hand and speaking out... vocally among the rest of the local community...
so there is no secret ballot at local level.
2. every mature ( adult age or technically anyone sensible ) member is give their opinion, and one has to explain their positions on "yes", "no" or otherwise... so everyone in the community knows each other's position on some issue.
3. the secretariat of the local community/commune ( basic people's congress ) records the opinions and recommendations of the people, to deliver it to the higher level.
4. the decisions taken in this gathering ( about local issues or otherwise ) have been taken by consensus... all done openly.
5. the decisions/recommendations are fixed.
6. the secretariat had been earlier selected by the local community people, by consensus... so the local community knows that any change in their present decisions/recommendations supposedly fixed must mean that their secretariat must have changed them... in that case, the community people will question the secretariat and can complain to the next level ( municipal people's congress ).
7. any work or idea that can be implemented or effected at local community level is taken care of by local "people's committees"... works like security, water works etc... these "people's committees" are supervised by the local secretariats which themselves have been chosen by the people.
8. for decision/recommendation that cannot be fulfilled at local level, and assuming that these have been truthfully delivered to the next level ( municipal people's congress ) which looks after all local communities ( basic people's congresses ) in a city, the secretariat at this higher level ( mpc ) takes decisions at a big-picture level for the entire city... keeping in mind the decisions/recommendations of each local community.
9. the secretariat of the municipal people's congress has been selected either from local communities or elsewhere but by consensus of the all local community people through each local secretariats taking their community's consensus and recommendations.
10. the secretariat of the municipal people's congress has appointed "municipal people's committees" to take care of works at city level.
11. since the secretariat of the municipal people's congress has been directly appointed by the local community peoples, it must notify the local community secretariats about the works to be undertaken or the recommendations accepted or rejected ( with due reason ).... and the local secretariats informs their local communities... and at any point, the local people can question the municipal people's congress about the progress of the decisions/recommendations given by their local community.
12. some cities can be grouped for administrative purposes... these can form a regional people's congress... with its own secretariat... and this secretariat is chosen by the smallest unit in the region ( local community / basic people's congress ) by the local secretariats taking consensus from the local peoples about the secretariat candidates... so again the transparency.
13. the highest level in the general people's congress which looks after all the local communities in the society through the preceding level of secretariats... toward this duty, the general people's congress has a general secretariat and general people's committees..
14. this can be scaled to world level by rearranging present nations into mixed smaller regions... and assigning regional people's congresses to each such region... the the general people's congress would be at world scale, something like present "united nations organization" but actually working for humanity.
that took a long time to type... please do ask for anything i may have missed.
And fortunately most of the armed forces defected.... Hope they achieve what they set out for.
false... the libyan army fought... which is why nato had to send in tens of thousands of foreign fighters ( ikhwaan/taliban/qaeda etc )... and then nato militaries themselves invaded by air and sea.
the libyan city of sirte which defended the honor of jamahiriya system... this city withstood nato air bombardment and terrorist ground bombardment
for months... russian generals have called sirte city "the libyan stalindgrad".
i could tell you all more but that was all in 2011... as of now, the libyans resist the nato-installed qaeda/ikhwaan "government"... you can ask your tobruk contacts their views the present government and the present situation about jamahiri fighter and supporters.
I believe Jamahir is no Libyan. He is an Indian who adores Gaddafi(Correct me if I am wrong
@jamahir)...
yes, i am india-born.
He is not (he just has a man crush on Gaddafi
)i. I meant all the proponents of his Jamahiriyan movement.
I hope he is not offended....
i am a socialist who propagates the jamahiriya ideology... i do not worship any human.
gaddafi is one of my heroes, a brilliant man who contributed to humanity, a brilliant speaker and writer, and quite unique in history... he is something for all socialists, for muslims, for africans, for humans... there is no shame in saying that.
my other heroes are lenin, carlos, tipu sultan, che guevara, nasser and others down history...