India isn't building a military to take on China

[seesonic]

THis is bizarre ........ are you laughing at yourself ?

Can you read and understand english ?

 

[Gadkari]

Can you read and understand english ?

Why ? you want to laugh at yourself, some more ?

 

[seesonic]

Why ? you want to laugh at yourself, some more ?

 

[Tom M]

Sino-Indian War

Result Chinese victory
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Indian_War

Oh, yeah, I knew it was coming. LOL

Victory only in terms of Objectives achieved. If they were too victorious, why did they unilaterally withdrew their troops to pre-war position especially in the territories they had been claiming their own for years (Tawang), rather choose to keep barren Aksai Chin instead ?? Any guess ????

 

[comfortably_numb]

Oh, yeah, I knew it was coming. LOL

Victory only in terms of Objectives achieved. If they were too victorious, why did they unilaterally withdrew their troops to pre-war position especially in the territories they had been claiming their own for years (Tawang), rather choose to keep barren Aksai Chin instead ?? Any guess ????

Because the Chinese understood the pulse of the people, Arunachalis did not like them one bit and didn't want to share the same fate as the Tibetans.

 

[Tom M]

Because the Chinese understood the pulse of the people, Arunachalis did not like them one bit and didn't want to share the same fate as the Tibetans.

Might be. But the main thing as per military POV is maintaining such a big troop size in a contested territory, providing reinforcements and logistics, it's simply not practical. As far as Aksai Chin is concerned, it is the exactly the same or bit more hard for India.

 

[Lil Mathew]

India lacks funds hence it is not in a position to spend more on its military. 25% of revenue goes towards debt servicing.

Imagine a so called fastest growing economy a la India borrowing peanuts from World Bank:
India Signs Loan Agreement with the World Bank for USD 40 Million

Uber shame.

India received a loan of $3.8 billion in 2015, the largest in the sub-continent, followed by China ($1.8 billion) in East Asia and Pacific... By your logic China also getting peanuts from World bank...

 

[comfortably_numb]

Might be. But the main thing as per military POV is maintaining such a big troop size in a contested territory, providing reinforcements and logistics, it's simply not practical. As far as Aksai Chin is concerned, it is the exactly the same or bit more hard for India.

That was without doubt the most important factor. The Chinese crossed into the north bank town of Tezpur in Assam from Bhalukpong in Arunachal. Assam was virtually defenceless and could have been overrun in a short time. Then they decided to turn back unexpectedly. Perhaps they understood the futility of it all and didn't want to antagonize the local populace any more.

 

[Gadkari]

That was without doubt the most important factor. The Chinese crossed into the north bank town of Tezpur in Assam from Bhalukpong in Arunachal. Assam was virtually defenceless and could have been overrun in a short time. Then they decided to turn back unexpectedly. Perhaps they understood the futility of it all and didn't want to antagonize the local populace any more.

They attacked during the Cuban Missile crisis when other powers could not interfere.

It was the onset of winter and it was impossible to hold on since they did not have a supply chain and in the winter India would have kicked them out.

IT was a strategic retreat that let them create the illusion of a Victory.

They were smart about the whole thing , Nehru was dumb about the whole thing.

 

[Sam Vaish]

Are you really born this stupid ???? LOL

Well, some people are bro in this forum.

Why ? you want to laugh at yourself, some more ?

Leave this dumb jihadi alone bro.

 

[ashok321]

India received a loan of $3.8 billion in 2015, the largest in the sub-continent, followed by China ($1.8 billion) in East Asia and Pacific... By your logic China also getting peanuts from World bank...

The question is:
If China wanted to borrow more in 2015 than India, would the WB have rejected the same?

Now its your move to embarrass your own self.
The answer could be in "yes" or "no"...

In 2015 the Chinese economy was 5 times ahead of India as well as its (International) credit rating.
China still maintains the better credit rating than lackluster India.
Any question kid?

 

[Lil Mathew]

The question is:
If China wanted to borrow more in 2015 than India, would the WB have rejected the same?

Now its your move to embarrass your own self.
The answer could be in "yes" or "no"...

In 2015 the Chinese economy was 5 times ahead of India as well as its (International) credit rating.
China still maintains the better credit rating than lackluster India.
Any question kid?

Read your comment boy...

Imagine a so called fastest growing economy a la India borrowing peanuts from World Bank:
India Signs Loan Agreement with the World Bank for USD 40 Million

Uber shame.

By your logic...
Imagine a so called biggest economy China getting peanuts( $1.8 billion) from WB ... Understand???

 

[ashok321]

Read your comment boy...


By your logic...
Imagine a so called biggest economy China getting peanuts( $1.8 billion) from WB ... Understand???

How is a 1.8 billion equal to a 40 million dollars?
By how many times?
The number is 45 times.

Hence India is inferior to China by 45 times this way.

But its the solvency, credit rating and the sovereignty factor besides other factors which determines which country qualifies for how much loan.

Would Ethiopia qualify for 10 billion USD World Bank loan?

Don't be a moron to begin with.
I do not mind if you act like a Joker though..

 

[Lil Mathew]

How is a 1.8 billion equal to a 40 million dollars?
By how many times?
The number is 45 times.

Hence India is inferior to China by 45 times this way.

But its the solvency, credit rating and the sovereignty factor besides other factors which determines which country qualifies for how much loan.

Would Ethiopia qualify for 10 billion USD World Bank loan?

Don't be a moron to begin with.

Ha ha... You are a moron... This $1.8 billion is total credit for the the whole 2015... It spread for a number of small projects... India's total for that year was $3.8 billion... Obiviously that is also not for a single project...

 

[ashok321]

Ha ha... You are a moron... This $1.8 billion is total credit for the the whole 2015... It spread for a number of small projects... India's total for that year was $3.8 billion... Obiviously that is also not for a single project...

If you have guts produce the numbers in its entirety...
Would you?
Common charlatan!