India is evaluating options beyond dialogue and diplomacy against China

[faithfulguy]

Oh goodie. Another Nazi remark.

This is known as Godwin's law

Godwin's law - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1."

They have no more reasonable argument left so they resort to Nazi comparison.

 

[HongWu]

Still waiting for India to make a move on our forward outpost

Cowering kitty, roaring dragon: The new India-China story : Postnoon

 

[faithfulguy]

if permanent post in disputed sector is making a country "aggressor",then its China,not India.who erected tent first,kid??do I have to say that it is clear violation of the 1993 peace pact and protocol on modalities for implementation of CBMs in the military field along the LAC in the India-China border areas??They can't pass the LAC which is only can be settled by joint border talks(that area is still indian teritorry until they got that area via joint border talks).while the area is disputed,they are crossing LAC of those areas and now erected a camp(which is against CBM as they can't cross LAC in the first place).do I have to say more,kid??and about "tantrum",how come someone so weak in logic become think tank again??start reading and then post.don't quote gibberish to me.

Indians here need to believe that both India and China have different perception of what is LAC. And in between the LAC is the actual disputed area. India already has a concrete structure in the disputed area. China pitch the tents in the disputed area in the disputed area to get India to remove the concrete structure. And India is now claiming China cross over its own perception of LAC. This is the issue.

Maybe this is why little western media is reporting this as the news. They are actually giving India a break here as its obvious that India first erected the structure first.

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

Rightly said.

In 1962, Nehru had exactly the same thinking as you do today: forward policy.

Whatever happened to Chinese in 1971 and 1975, to Indira's thinking?

 

[nair]

India is doing things in matured way... I know this can be considered as a weakness.... but i believe this is the right way to do... try everything possible to resolve things (even though the adversaries is stupid).... once every options are over and there is no way ahead... ask the army to surround them....and cut the supply lines.. ( i do expect response from cheerleaders of chinese)

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

India should complain to the supreme court.

Witty troll!

 

[faithfulguy]

India is doing things in matured way... I know this can be considered as a weakness.... but i believe this is the right way to do... try everything possible to resolve things (even though the adversaries is stupid).... once every options are over and there is no way ahead... ask the army to surround them....and cut the supply lines.. ( i do expect response from cheerleaders of chinese)

If India is trying to cut off the supply line and shoot at Chinese supply line, this will lead the a war.
might as well start a war.

 

[deep hacker here]

THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE..

SUPERPOWER
IN ASIA

If India is trying to cut off the supply line and shoot at Chinese supply line, this will lead the a war.
might as well start a war.

WE INDIANS ARE READY FOR A WAR. ARE U?

 

[nair]

If India is trying to cut off the supply line and shoot at Chinese supply line, this will lead the a war.
might as well start a war.

I am sure indian authorities are well aware of it... and thats the reason they are trying to resolve it amicably... and they are trying what ever they can, GOI is playing down the incident but there are pressure on them... luckily there is another issue (coal gate) which is on headlines so this issue has not reported with too much of hype (it has been reported but if no coal gate this would have been much bigger)..... But if chinese are not responding to what ever india says then what to do?

 

[GR!FF!N]

Indians here need to believe that both India and China have different perception of what is LAC. And in between the LAC is the actual disputed area. India already has a concrete structure in the disputed area. China pitch the tents in the disputed area in the disputed area to get India to remove the concrete structure. And India is now claiming China cross over its own perception of LAC. This is the issue.

Maybe this is why little western media is reporting this as the news. They are actually giving India a break here as its obvious that India first erected the structure first.

and you need to believe that one can't move form its current position as thats against joint mechanism signed by both Indian and China.thats where joint border talk comes..did you see something like that happening??that means its china who violated that treaty,right??and India erected first or second,that doesn't matter.there is no restriction on that as that place is Indian side of LAC,India could do whatever thay want,but China can't as Status Quo is in place..

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

Is this map not accurate?

Note that India is the aggressor here by erecting a permanent post at Raki Nala in the disputed zone.

The picture doesn't mention if Indian post has been there at Raki Nala or been erected recently

 

[HongWu]

India is doing things in matured way... I know this can be considered as a weakness.... but i believe this is the right way to do... try everything possible to resolve things (even though the adversaries is stupid).... once every options are over and there is no way ahead... ask the army to surround them....and cut the supply lines.. ( i do expect response from cheerleaders of chinese)

How you are going to cut our supply lines when our trucks are escorted by infantry fighting vehicles and Type 99A2 main battle tanks are deployed in rear areas?

 

[faithfulguy]

and you need to believe that one can't move form its current position as thats against joint mechanism signed by both Indian and China.thats where joint border talk comes..did you see something like that happening??that means its china who violated that treaty,right??and India erected first or second,that doesn't matter.there is no restriction on that as that place is Indian side of LAC,India could do whatever thay want,but China can't as Status Quo is in place..

The question is that the tents are in China side of LAC according to Chinese, but not so according to Indians. So this first need to be iron out. Otherwise, its pointless to say who is right or wrong. Why not draw a line in the middle of the two perceived LAC and resolve the issue.

 

[deep hacker here]

How you are going to cut our supply lines when our trucks are escorted by infantry fighting vehicles and Type 99A2 main battle tanks are deployed in rear areas?

WE HAVE BRAVE HAERTED SOLDIERS TO DO THE JOB, WHEREAS U GUYS NEED FULL PROTECTION, BECAUSE U ALL ARE SCARED.
BY THE WAY WHO TOLD U THAT WE DONT HAVE TANKS. DO U HAVE

BRAHMOS WORLDS BEST CRUISE MISSILE

 

[deepak.chauhan2312]

lets see what our Supreme court have to say about that...I think in India, most of the tough decisions are made by supreme court as current GOI doesn't know how to respond.i don't understand why we have Govt if every time only SC takes tough decisions for India's future ex. Italy marine case.