India is a Hindu nation, says RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat

[The Snow Queen]

Offcoarse it is... India is not a secular nation. It is Hindustan, land of the Hindus.

 

[Juggernautjatt]

I am an RSS admirer but who would I know how many RSS people went to jail ?

RSS was NOT a political organization and a LOT of RSS members were also members of the Congress party ....... a LOT of RSS members were also part of the Civil Disobedience movements. Some were part of Subhas Chandra bose's "Azad hind sena". Some of them like Veer Savarkar is more well know.

Since RSS is not a political organisation then It means they have no right speak about nation since nation is a political institution. There are no proofs or mention in any history book about your claims or RSS members contribution in freedom movement.
Talking about Damodar Savarkar , he was not a freedom fighter or revolutionary because he begged the British for mercy & his release from jail. He wrote many letters to British admiring them & begging them for his release from andaman jail.
Savarkar had begged the British for mercy - The Times of India

Since AAP is established in 2012 we can now safely say that they had NO role to play in India's freedom struggle, right ?? ......so that must make them a desh drohi party ?

OK then according to your logic BJP is also a desh drohi party since it was established in 1980 & they had NO role to play in India's freedom struggle, right ??
Please provide some logic facts to prove that RSS is not a useless organisation like other religious organisations.

 

[Jayanta]

 

[NairLand]

Since RSS is not a political organisation then It means they have no right speak about nation since nation is a political institution.

........I was not aware that in India only political organizations can talk about nation.

There are no proofs or mention in any history book about your claims or RSS members contribution in freedom movement.
Talking about Damodar Savarkar , he was not a freedom fighter or revolutionary because he begged the British for mercy & his release from jail. He wrote many letters to British admiring them & begging them for his release from andaman jail.

...then its strange that his portrait hangs in the central hall of the parliament right next to Gandhi's portrait

OK then according to your logic BJP is also a desh drohi party since it was established in 1980 & they had NO role to play in India's freedom struggle, right ??
Please provide some logic facts to prove that RSS is not a useless organisation like other religious organisations.

Why should I prove anything of that sort ? That is your logic, not mine.

 

[Juggernautjatt]

Offcoarse it is... India is not a secular nation. It is Hindustan, land of the Hindus.

You are totally wrong on this fact. The name Hind (Persian) is derived from the Iranian equivalent of SINDH. In Persian stan means "country" or "land. Modern day North India (not whole country) was included as Hindustān in Persian.
Another most important thing is today, word Hindustan is no longer in use as the official name for India.

 

[Juggernautjatt]

........I was not aware that in India only political organizations can talk about nation.

Yup if an organisation has zero contribution in building a nation then they have no right to talk about people of nation.
Infact RSS has only right to talk about hindu religion not about people of other religions.

...then its strange that his portrait hangs in the central hall of the parliament right next to Gandhi's portrait

Yes sadly this is one of the most unfortunate things happened in free india courtesy corrupt & opportunist leaders. Infact RSS-BJP, which has no history of participation in the freedom movement, is desperate to hunt for someone from the Hindutva ranks, whom they can claim as a freedom fighter. And Savarkar is the only one whom they can prune and touch-up to fit the slot. BJP is just trying to cash savarkar name just like congress trying to cash Gandhi's name.

Why should I prove anything of that sort ? That is your logic, not mine.

Because you are replying my question & you said you are admirer of RSS.

 

[NairLand]

Yup if an organisation has zero contribution in building a nation then they have no right to talk about people of nation.
Infact RSS has only right to talk about hindu religion not about people of other religions.

Yes sadly this is one of the most unfortunate things happened in free india courtesy corrupt & opportunist leaders. Infact RSS-BJP, which has no history of participation in the freedom movement, is desperate to hunt for someone from the Hindutva ranks, whom they can claim as a freedom fighter. And Savarkar is the only one whom they can prune and touch-up to fit the slot. BJP is just trying to cash savarkar name just like congress trying to cash Gandhi's name.

Because you are replying my question & you said you are admirer of RSS.

.....boo hoo ..... go cry on some one else's shoulder.

 

[SrNair]

As usual, in a fake secular country. Glad Jinnah realized this, and got us a separate homeland.

We are also glad.By dividing he cleared a possible headache of us.

 

[SrNair]

Since RSS is not a political organisation then It means they have no right speak about nation since nation is a political institution. There are no proofs or mention in any history book about your claims or RSS members contribution in freedom movement.
Talking about Damodar Savarkar , he was not a freedom fighter or revolutionary because he begged the British for mercy & his release from jail. He wrote many letters to British admiring them & begging them for his release from andaman jail.
Savarkar had begged the British for mercy - The Times of India


OK then according to your logic BJP is also a desh drohi party since it was established in 1980 & they had NO role to play in India's freedom struggle, right ??
Please provide some logic facts to prove that RSS is not a useless organisation like other religious organisations.

It is right .Some parts of RSS gone wrong.But you cant generalize entire organization for that.You are talking a lot about RSS contribution for freedom fighting.
May be it is right because full fledgrd growth of RSS happened only after several years .
Do you know anything about RSS contribution after 1947?
In first kashmir war of 1947-48 ,1965,1971 even 1999.
If you dont ,you should know that.They helped Indian Army anf fought for our nation during 1947-48.You dont know that the thousands of people are helped by RSS during 1947-48, thousands of womens escaped from molestation by invaders due RSS sacrifices.These same organization helped IA in logistics in following wars.

About others contribution even our nations father did some mistake particularly in a case where Gandhi forget that guy in your avatar.A True Hero of Indians.

On topic.Hinduism can accomodate any other religion.Because it is a Dharmic religion.A true secular religion.

 

[Juggernautjatt]

.....boo hoo ..... go cry on some one else's shoulder.

your post clearly shows that you are running out of reasons

It is right .Some parts of RSS gone wrong.But you cant generalize entire organization for that.You are talking a lot about RSS contribution for freedom fighting.
May be it is right because full fledgrd growth of RSS happened only after several years .
Do you know anything about RSS contribution after 1947?
In first kashmir war of 1947-48 ,1965,1971 even 1999.
If you dont ,you should know that.They helped Indian Army anf fought for our nation during 1947-48.You dont know that the thousands of people are helped by RSS during 1947-48, thousands of womens escaped from molestation by invaders due RSS sacrifices.These same organization helped IA in logistics in following wars.

About others contribution even our nations father did some mistake particularly in a case where Gandhi forget that guy in your avatar.A True Hero of Indians.

On topic.Hinduism can accomodate any other religion.Because it is a Dharmic religion.A true secular religion.

Well bro the question is why would any other religion take shelter in hinduism? Every religion has its own separate identity.
Another thing I forgot to mention that Hinduism is not a religion.There is no reference of the word "hindu" in the Ancient Vedic Scriptures. It is said that the Persians used to refer to the Indus river as Sindhu. Indus is a major river which flows partly in India and partly in Pakistan. However, the Persians could not pronounce the letter "S" correctly in their native tongue and mispronounced it as "H." Thus, for the ancient Persians, the word "Sindhu" became "Hindu.
Infact Sanatan dharm is the real religion not hinduism.

 

[NairLand]

your post clearly shows that you are running out of reasons

Well bro the question is why would any other religion take shelter in hinduism? Every religion has its own separate identity.
Another thing I forgot to mention that Hinduism is not a religion.There is no reference of the word "hindu" in the Ancient Vedic Scriptures. It is said that the Persians used to refer to the Indus river as Sindhu. Indus is a major river which flows partly in India and partly in Pakistan. However, the Persians could not pronounce the letter "S" correctly in their native tongue and mispronounced it as "H." Thus, for the ancient Persians, the word "Sindhu" became "Hindu.
Infact Sanatan dharm is the real religion not hinduism.

You finally got something right. I have totally run of out reasons to engage with you

 

[Juggernautjatt]

You finally got something right. I have totally run of out reasons to engage with you

I got everything right I think you are again misunderstanding my post.

 

[SrNair]

your post clearly shows that you are running out of reasons


Well bro the question is why would any other religion take shelter in hinduism? Every religion has its own separate identity.
Another thing I forgot to mention that Hinduism is not a religion.There is no reference of the word "hindu" in the Ancient Vedic Scriptures. It is said that the Persians used to refer to the Indus river as Sindhu. Indus is a major river which flows partly in India and partly in Pakistan. However, the Persians could not pronounce the letter "S" correctly in their native tongue and mispronounced it as "H." Thus, for the ancient Persians, the word "Sindhu" became "Hindu.
Infact Sanatan dharm is the real religion not hinduism.

Ok then you should call it as Sanatan Dharma.But its principles still remain same.

 

[abjktu]

your post clearly shows that you are running out of reasons


Well bro the question is why would any other religion take shelter in hinduism? Every religion has its own separate identity.

yes Every religion has its own separate identity..but cultural wise all Indians are more or less equal,which is based upon hinduthwa identity...There is no much difference between a say Malayali ,Muslim and a Malayali Hindi,except in their religion..Language,Culture,Dress,Food habits are same to same...
Yes,Hinduism can accommodate every other religion..Thats what in a hindu majority India,every minorities has the same rights as that of majority and are living happily without feeling alienated,unlike in our non Hindu neighboring countries...No one gets discriminated on their caste or religious background...
thnx..

 

[Juggernautjatt]

Ok then you should call it as Sanatan Dharma.But its principles still remain same.

But the persian word hindu refers to people living near indus river and this river mainly flows in pakistan. Saying all indians are hindu is like saying all indians are pakistani.

yes Every religion has its own separate identity..but cultural wise all Indians are more or less equal,which is based upon hinduthwa identity...There is no much difference between a say Malayali ,Muslim and a Malayali Hindi,except in their religion..Language,Culture,Dress,Food habits are same to same...
Yes,Hinduism can accommodate every other religion..Thats what in a hindu majority India,every minorities has the same rights as that of majority and are living happily without feeling alienated,unlike in our non Hindu neighboring countries...No one gets discriminated on their caste or religious background...
thnx..

Are you sure culture of north indians & south indians is same & there is no difference in culture of gujratis & assamese?
If there is no discriminaton on the basis of caste system in indian religions then what is the need for reservation policy?